|
|
| Author |
Message |
moo
|
|
A Celtic Campaign!
| 
Apr 19 21:06 UTC 1995 |
all right y'all, this campaign will probably move off grex in a few
months, but until then it'll stay here.
Don't start rolling up those Typical AD&D characters until you listen to this:
Typical Celtic campaigns have no non-human characters, however, we already have
a Gnome, so I may allow elves and half-elves. When you roll a character, roll
d20, then mail me before you enter your character in. I will then tell you
your random birth-thingi. If you plan to play a magic-user, let me know right
away.
This is because there are no natural magic-users in a Celtic campaign.
If it sounds boring, believe me it won't be. Here are the available classes:
Fighter
Ranger
Druid
Magic User (restricted)
Bard
Thief (New Rules)
New Class:
Manteis
New Rules:
Manteis:
Requires the Manteis Birthgift, 16 Wisdom
In my campaign, a Manteis may take spells from Priest and Mage Divination
Schools/Spheres, Enchantment/Charm Mage School, Guardian, and All Spheres.
He may take a dagger, staff, or sling. Ask me about other weapons.
thief:
A thief may wield any weapon he wants and where any armor.
There are restrictions on Climb Walls/Move Silently for certain
armor types. There is no Thieves Cant, and thieves can't read scrolls.
Names:
There are to many to "name" (ha ha) but talk to me if you want a celtic
one.
If there is anything else you need to know, let me know... otherwise, roll up
them characters!
|
| 21 responses total. |
kain
|
|
response 1 of 21:
|
Apr 19 21:29 UTC 1995 |
I have just put'em in here!
|
kain
|
|
response 2 of 21:
|
Apr 23 14:21 UTC 1995 |
adam I have my character so put 'em in anyone esle interseted? and actually
adam I think no never mind just put him in pleeze.
|
wurm
|
|
response 3 of 21:
|
Apr 30 05:29 UTC 1995 |
thi is getting yawny link to to games the zone agora and ds that should liven
it up!
|
kain
|
|
response 4 of 21:
|
Apr 30 13:11 UTC 1995 |
yup! yup!
|
kain
|
|
response 5 of 21:
|
Dec 31 18:11 UTC 1995 |
this item seems mildly dead if moo doesn't respond within a week out the
window it goes
|
setzer
|
|
response 6 of 21:
|
Jan 3 21:14 UTC 1996 |
Sh**, that's an old one!!!
|
kain
|
|
response 7 of 21:
|
Jan 9 21:22 UTC 1996 |
you noticed, hey! I got an idea this is now the drift item!
|
bjorn
|
|
response 8 of 21:
|
Jan 10 01:18 UTC 1996 |
Why don't we just kill it and build it a nice burial barrow?
|
kain
|
|
response 9 of 21:
|
Jan 11 03:26 UTC 1996 |
because killing is bad
|
bjorn
|
|
response 10 of 21:
|
Jan 11 18:18 UTC 1996 |
Are you denying me the right to be Evil?!
|
kain
|
|
response 11 of 21:
|
Jan 11 21:03 UTC 1996 |
no denying me the right, you not an fw
|
bjorn
|
|
response 12 of 21:
|
Jan 12 01:26 UTC 1996 |
For this conference, that be.
|
gandalf
|
|
response 13 of 21:
|
Jan 14 05:16 UTC 1996 |
I suppose we can just let the poor thing live, can we???
|
kain
|
|
response 14 of 21:
|
Jan 17 00:22 UTC 1996 |
sure why not, shall we bring up a new subject
|
jamie
|
|
response 15 of 21:
|
Mar 4 02:11 UTC 1996 |
Any way to prevent a rakshasa from being killed by a Blessed crossbow bolt?
I've got a party with two crossbow usersa with amazingly good luck on attack
rolls, two clerics, and two players who are DMs, one of whom has toruble
keeping his mouth shut....
A magic-dead area wouldn't help my rakshasa much, either...
/.
|
mneme
|
|
response 16 of 21:
|
Mar 4 03:14 UTC 1996 |
Sure. Rakshasa's can do illusion, right? Get tricky, have the Rakshasa
seduce one of the PCs, etc...
Just don't let them know what they are fighting.
|
jamie
|
|
response 17 of 21:
|
Mar 4 21:03 UTC 1996 |
Ah, yes, but rakshasa cannot keep the illusion going after they have attacked.
As soon as they attack, they must drop the illusino and show their true form,
so if the characters recongize it for what it is after it has dropped the
illusino, then it's too late for the rakshasa.....
|
kain
|
|
response 18 of 21:
|
Mar 10 03:48 UTC 1996 |
hmm, that's a tuffie, send in some help from another monster
|
starwolf
|
|
response 19 of 21:
|
Apr 3 21:23 UTC 1996 |
If the Rakshasa can cast 4th-level vel spells, protection form normal missiles
might help...
|
draco
|
|
response 20 of 21:
|
Apr 18 03:02 UTC 2001 |
why is it that the dates for all the responds are 95-96 when this is 01' huh?
|
kingjon
|
|
response 21 of 21:
|
Apr 29 19:50 UTC 2001 |
This is the *old* RPG conference. I think RPG II conference is still active
(slightly), but the main one is amalgam, which has most items from this one
and RPG II are linked to it.
Also, even amalgam is a little out of date. The only reason I get it is that
it's the top one on my .cflist.
|