response 289 of 357:

Jan 24 20:04 UTC 2004

Point me to a post where I *haven't* been thinking. I'm "screaming" 
because the censorship is so obvious I cannot believe grex's collective IQ
(which I previously had thought to be fairly high) fails to see it. That
leaves at least two possibilities: The collective IQ is no where near as
high as I originally thought (ie. a bunch of feebs are pulling the numbers
way down) or the feel-gooders have no rational way to prevail except to
obfuscate and/or rely on emotion rather than logic. Pointing out that I am
sprinkling my rational arguments with a few insults hardly makes your
argument rational and mine emotional. 

I am more than willing to argue rationally.  No one in suppoprt of jep's
proposal seem willing to do so, however. The reason is that no rational
arguments can be made that do not ultimately support censorship. Some of
you are trying to do a personal favor for a favored person without
admitting to yourselves and to grex that in so doing you are inevitably
and unavoidably striking a blow against free and uncensored speech.