jep
|
|
response 153 of 357:
|
Jan 14 14:15 UTC 2004 |
re resp:152: Jack, my point in mentioning you is that you're someone
who doesn't know me very well, yet in resp:115 you referred to me and
said "unethical" about 4 times. I didn't mean to pick on you. I'm
sorry, because it's clear to me why you'd take it that way.
I haven't discussed in great detail the reasons I think there is risk
from those items. I don't want to. More detail about that isn't going
to change the discussion.
Once again, I'm not trying to change any policies, and I don't think I
*am* changing any policies. I'm asking for a very specific exception.
My request is not a referendum on Valerie or on her actions.
|