You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   65-89   90   91-115   116-140   141-165   166-190 
 191-215   216-240   241-265   266-290   291-315   316-340   341-365   366-390   391-415 
 416-424          
 
Author Message
1 new of 424 responses total.
cyklone
response 90 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 03:35 UTC 2004

You missed my point. I agree with the last paragraph and have specically said
if you are making a new exceptions you damn sure better make sure you have
a good reason. Speculation is not a good reason. If you want to argue law then
here's what I propose: Delete all of jep's posts, print them out and have his
lawyer review them. If in the lawyer's opinion those posts could cause jep
harm, then I would agree to the deletion. Anything less than this is an utter
abdication of any concepts of free speech and principled applications or
exceptions to the rules. I will even kick in $50 to defray the cost to jep.
Feel free to match it.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   65-89   90   91-115   116-140   141-165   166-190 
 191-215   216-240   241-265   266-290   291-315   316-340   341-365   366-390   391-415 
 416-424          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss