You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   88-112   113   114-138   139-163   164-188 
 189-213   214-238   239-263   264-288   289-313   314-338   339-363   364-388   389-413 
 414-424          
 
Author Message
1 new of 424 responses total.
cyklone
response 113 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 00:32 UTC 2004

You may make that assumption. I would not. For one thing, there is a huge
hearsay issue that may or may not make the entire discussion moot. Your
"yeah, go ahead" comment also misses the point. The purpose of the
lawyer's review would not be to inquire as to whether or not jep should
leave *his* posts readable. The questions for review would be "Can these
*other people's* comments cause problems for me? If so, what kind of
problems could I expect?" 

In any case, even if you are right, I consider $200 a small price to pay
to justify the extreme notion that a well-meaning parent can request other
people's posts be deleted. I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is. 
How about you? 

It also appears that your views are contradicted by one of the very people
janc previously cited (joe saul) in support of deletion. 

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   88-112   113   114-138   139-163   164-188 
 189-213   214-238   239-263   264-288   289-313   314-338   339-363   364-388   389-413 
 414-424          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss