| You are not logged in. Login Now | register | search | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||
| Author | Message | ||
| 1 new of 480 responses total. | |||
|
rcurl |
Spam might be thought of as an infection, and spam blocking is equivalent to antibiotics. However is there any potential for *immunization*? I imagine an "anti-spam bot" that infects people's computers with a spam-bot killer application. I can see an ethical question in this - immunizing users' computers without their knowledge - but that is till better than the infection, especially as the "anti-spam bot" could be made to have no side effects. | ||
|
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In |
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss