spooked
|
|
response 123 of 236:
|
Dec 27 06:21 UTC 2006 |
You don't "have to" change, but if Grex wants to move forward (and I'm
seriously doubting that) then big changes have to take place, because the
current processes have totally screwed the production line and it cannot
keep good people enthusiastically particpating in staffing it (note, this
does NOT include symbolicly staffing it, either).
If you think geez Grex must be great because of its balance sheet -- you're
a moron. Most of Grex's shallow bank account stays propped up because of
large one-off occasional generous donors. The question you should be
asking is if Grex was financially sound (and it is not) is what services
or give backs has/is it providing to the user/community base. You only
need to log onto freeshell.org and know half a degree or two about
Unix/bbs/conferencing to see Grex is well over a decade behind and
falling further and further behind every second.
It's sad enough that Grex is in the position it is in. What's even more
tragic is that supposedly responsible/intelligent/caring Grex-folk think
it is all lovely and snuggly.
|