|
|
| Author |
Message |
pony
|
|
Announcements item
| 
Jul 5 17:55 UTC 2000 |
Well, granted, most of the items in this cf are announcement items, for once
I have my own announcement to enter.
So here is an announcements item.
--tcith
|
| 62 responses total. |
vous
|
|
response 1 of 62:
|
Jul 5 17:55 UTC 2000 |
fuck the limeys.
|
pony
|
|
response 2 of 62:
|
Jul 5 17:56 UTC 2000 |
I would like to anounce that this morning I passed 70-081 Implementing and
Supporting Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5.
--tcith
|
jerryr
|
|
response 3 of 62:
|
Jul 5 17:59 UTC 2000 |
you gop!
|
jor
|
|
response 4 of 62:
|
Jul 5 18:05 UTC 2000 |
Microsoft Sexchange
|
tod
|
|
response 5 of 62:
|
Jul 5 18:17 UTC 2000 |
Ali, wnat a job?
|
twinkie
|
|
response 6 of 62:
|
Jul 5 20:48 UTC 2000 |
I would like to announce that I've been an Exchange admin for the past couple
months, and I've never even seen 70-081 :-P
|
mdw
|
|
response 7 of 62:
|
Jul 5 20:51 UTC 2000 |
Isn't the correct answer to Microsoft Exchange "no"? Surely a complete
course isn't necessary for this?
|
twinkie
|
|
response 8 of 62:
|
Jul 5 21:02 UTC 2000 |
You're confusing Exchange with Lotus Notes.
And with Lotus, you do need a complete course so that you can back up your
statement every time you have to say "No. It can't do that."
|
jerome
|
|
response 9 of 62:
|
Jul 5 21:34 UTC 2000 |
VMS Mail. You read; you send. You receive; you transmit. No virii.
|
jp2
|
|
response 10 of 62:
|
Jul 5 21:59 UTC 2000 |
This response has been erased.
|
mdw
|
|
response 11 of 62:
|
Jul 6 00:01 UTC 2000 |
Oh, I don't think I'm confusing exchange with lotus notes. This *is*
the mail software that eats machines for breakfast and wants more? The
one that needs a full-time person to baby-sit it just to keep it from
self-destructing? The one where security was so much of an after-thought
that the anti-virus "fixes" cripple it?
|
jp2
|
|
response 12 of 62:
|
Jul 6 02:09 UTC 2000 |
This response has been erased.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 13 of 62:
|
Jul 6 03:02 UTC 2000 |
re: 11 -- No, that's Lotus Notes. A properly-built Exchange server will run
for months, with little intervention. And as long as you update your virus
defs (which do not cripple the server), it's all good.
The security issues are problems with Outlook, not Exchange Server.
|
jp2
|
|
response 14 of 62:
|
Jul 6 03:12 UTC 2000 |
This response has been erased.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 15 of 62:
|
Jul 6 03:54 UTC 2000 |
Because it was not built properly.
Why is it the Exchange server I built at work hasn't been rebooted in a month,
and is faster than greased shit?
|
buzzard
|
|
response 16 of 62:
|
Jul 6 13:31 UTC 2000 |
Greased shit?!?!?!
I'm using Exchange here at work right now and it's kinda like greased shit
too... er, wait... I meant greasy shit.
|
jor
|
|
response 17 of 62:
|
Jul 6 14:11 UTC 2000 |
I miss VMS mail.
|
jerome
|
|
response 18 of 62:
|
Jul 6 14:31 UTC 2000 |
Me, too. Elegance by simplicity. Do one thing and do it well.
|
violator
|
|
response 19 of 62:
|
Jul 6 16:44 UTC 2000 |
i have to use lotus notes at work. and at times i am VERY frustrated
with it. uuf!
|
jep
|
|
response 20 of 62:
|
Jul 6 16:56 UTC 2000 |
We use Lotus Notes, and I am always frustrated with it.
We're going to be switching to MS Outlook in the near future. I expect
not to like that a lot more, but at least the user interface is not
designed specifically to prevent the sending, receiving and storing of
e-mail. It's designed, instead, to encourage the spread of
system-destroying viruses.
This, at a company that sometimes sends one-line text messages as MS
Word attachments. A company which daily sends links to an internal WWW
site, from which you read MS Word attachments that are 1-5 screen text
messages. (Psst! Guys! Just send the text, right in the body of the
e-mail!)
|
ric
|
|
response 21 of 62:
|
Jul 6 17:05 UTC 2000 |
One of my coworkers, who is a certified lotus notes administrator (that's not
what she's doing now) says that John is correct.
Lotis Notes is specifically designed to prevent the sending, receiving and
storing of email.
|
jep
|
|
response 22 of 62:
|
Jul 6 17:09 UTC 2000 |
Why did you have to ask, Rick? You know I never exaggerate.
Exaggeration is the worst possible thing anyone can ever do. Everyone
who ever exaggerates, about anything, should be shot, carved into little
bits, ground up, and then flushed down the garbage disposal.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 23 of 62:
|
Jul 6 17:31 UTC 2000 |
and then the garbage disposal should be incinerated
by an ATOMIC BOMB!
|
jerryr
|
|
response 24 of 62:
|
Jul 6 17:33 UTC 2000 |
only after you strap a couple of young orphans to it
|