You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-22          
 
Author Message
pfv
Mnut flops again. Mark Unseen   Nov 22 18:19 UTC 1996

        Down again. and still down an hour later *sigh*

22 responses total.
scott
response 1 of 22: Mark Unseen   Nov 22 22:56 UTC 1996

That's OK, we've turned on the Ping Pong flag on Grex also.  ;)
robh
response 2 of 22: Mark Unseen   Nov 24 23:24 UTC 1996

I just got a finger response from them, I assume all is well now?
russ
response 3 of 22: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 03:44 UTC 1996

Not if my experienceof half an hour ago has been repeated often of late.
(No answer on 996-4644.)
pfv
response 4 of 22: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 05:04 UTC 1996

        I'm getting 1 second pings from here, but interrupting my direct 
        dial to mnet reports no carrier, rather than busy..

        I submit there is another "oopsie".

pfv
response 5 of 22: Mark Unseen   Dec 3 21:15 UTC 1996

        Crash Go The Chariots.... Again. *sigh*

russ
response 6 of 22: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 13:53 UTC 1997

As I write this, M-Net has been down since sometime Thursday.
Does anyone know what's wrong this time?
void
response 7 of 22: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 22:30 UTC 1997

   it was up a short while ago, but crashed around 5 pm. i'm not sure what
the reason for yesterday's crash was. today, the load averages seemed very
high prior to the crash.
tpryan
response 8 of 22: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 22:40 UTC 1997

        Is is dead to everyone or just non pciking up the phones again?
russ
response 9 of 22: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 01:13 UTC 1997

It seems to be dead completely.  Out of 3 phone numbers, none are
picked up and it's also dead via Internet.
jor
response 10 of 22: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 01:43 UTC 1997

        It was up sporadically yesterday and today

        now, no dice

        no clue


tonster
response 11 of 22: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 20:22 UTC 1997

just talked to linda and she says that it's down and can't be rebooted until
a root is contacted.  Apparently it freezes at the quote script and we know
how to fix it, but can't fix it without the root password...so right now, we
wait...
jor
response 12 of 22: Mark Unseen   Feb 1 23:13 UTC 1997

        Out little electronic miscreant just responded with
        messages about rebuilding the file system.
pfv
response 13 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 9 19:28 UTC 1997

        Sunday; 1427 hours..

        Tried "arbornet.org", 206.84.193.2 and 206.62.39.57 from coast..

        None of them worked, so I tried the dialins... First I got the
        infamous "no carrier", then it started reporting "busy".

        Yeah, I'd say m-net has a few problems...
salang
response 14 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 21:18 UTC 1997

Still down.  But, the goodnews is...they were up sometime since this morning.
My mail got forwarded to my other account sometime today.  Maybe that is a
good sign...then again maybe not.

salang
response 15 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 20:42 UTC 1997

Still down...any guesses??
pfv
response 16 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 21:35 UTC 1997

        yeah, I guess it's time to find a new mail-point, eh?
salang
response 17 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 00:46 UTC 1997

yea, I've got an account at phish.nether.net.  They support pop mail.  That
is how I usually check mine.  But, you have to be familiar with Unix to use
it.
pfv
response 18 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 03:01 UTC 1997

        maaannn.. what's worse..? the dead sarcasm or nether as the
        antichrist..?

        geezus
salang
response 19 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 20:52 UTC 1997

I'm not sure.  Although a friend told me that m-net was up for a while last
night.  If they're down for so long it better be for a nice hardware upgrade
or something worthwhile.  We can only hope for the best.  Hopefully our old
friend (m-net) will pull through this one...
silvers
response 20 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 00:15 UTC 1997

I hear the imperial march
salang
response 21 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 15:51 UTC 1997

back up...but no mail!  It sends fine but isn't holding or forwarding any
mail...what gives?
tsty
response 22 of 22: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 10:32 UTC 1997

email is being parsed *in* at a liveable & fixed rate. email going
*out* is not (and never has been( a problem.
  
of course, forwarding doubles the load... why not have it go directly
instead of bouncing in and out of a couple of staggering systems?
 0-22          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss