|
Grex > Mnet > #12: Policy Conference In Exile | |
|
| Author |
Message |
dpc
|
|
Policy Conference In Exile
|
Jul 18 17:25 UTC 1996 |
OK, people, take your best hold!
|
| 90 responses total. |
steve
|
|
response 1 of 90:
|
Jul 18 20:30 UTC 1996 |
I should have asked here, rather than in another item, but have
the books been transfered yet?
|
dpc
|
|
response 2 of 90:
|
Jul 19 00:45 UTC 1996 |
Now set for High Noon at the Art Fair Booth Building Party.
|
scg
|
|
response 3 of 90:
|
Jul 19 06:08 UTC 1996 |
What's it going to be postponed to at that point?
|
void
|
|
response 4 of 90:
|
Jul 19 08:44 UTC 1996 |
see item 11, response #10. there is no excuse for the transfer to be taking
this long.
|
jor
|
|
response 5 of 90:
|
Jul 19 16:00 UTC 1996 |
B minus 24 and counting.
|
rickyb
|
|
response 6 of 90:
|
Jul 21 16:29 UTC 1996 |
WHAT ACTION WILL THE BOARD TAKE IF THE BOOKS ARE NOT HANDED OVER
TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE BY TOMORROW, MONDAY, JULY 22, 1996?
|
pfv
|
|
response 7 of 90:
|
Jul 21 17:03 UTC 1996 |
Same as usual, I imagine - not a thing...
Membership drives are so _obviously_ more important to Arbornet than
having proper accounting, accountability and responsibility <shrug>.
Why on Earth would anyone expect anything else?
|
jerryr
|
|
response 8 of 90:
|
Jul 21 21:38 UTC 1996 |
it's a wonderment to me how anyone can man an arbornet booth at the art fairs
and keep a straight face as they extol arbornet/m-net's supposed virtues -
especially if they use e-mail as a selling point.
|
goroke
|
|
response 9 of 90:
|
Jul 21 23:44 UTC 1996 |
Anyone up to doing a picket in front of the Arbornet Art Fair booth protesting
the failure of craig and/or linda to turn over the books? Perhaps posing a
real threat to Arbornet's cash-flow is the only way to get the point through
craig's dense cranium. I am serious about this. This passed being ridiculous
quite a while ago.
|
pfv
|
|
response 10 of 90:
|
Jul 21 23:48 UTC 1996 |
Sorry, if the Borg won't act, and the Patrons allow the behavior, I
cannot see wasting my time...
Too bad, but it's pretty much typical of (and consistent with) the Borg
behavior of the past year plus..
|
steve
|
|
response 11 of 90:
|
Jul 22 02:54 UTC 1996 |
Wow. I'd never thought of that. I wonder what the Ann Arbor News would
do with that as a potential story?
|
rickyb
|
|
response 12 of 90:
|
Jul 22 20:09 UTC 1996 |
I think that would be an interesting situation (ie; #9). Maybe _real_ public
humiliation is the only way to get any action. At least, the athorities would
become aware of the gravity of the situation and, perhaps, they could get the
books pryed loose.
|
goroke
|
|
response 13 of 90:
|
Jul 22 20:27 UTC 1996 |
Does anyone care to seriously pursue this course of action? If so, post it
here so that we can attempt to co-ordinate shifts of picketers.
I suppose it would only be fair to notify craig et. al. if we really decide
to go through with this, but to hell with fair. Fair went out the window when
craig declined to provide Dave with the books right after the election.
|
mdw
|
|
response 14 of 90:
|
Jul 22 21:09 UTC 1996 |
Not to be picky or anything, but are you protesting craig, the borg,
arbornet, or m-net? Does craig and/or the borg (whatever that is)
control arbornet or m-net still? If they are sort of disassociated,
then hurting m-net may not be a very effective means to achieve results,
and the resulting harm to m-net may be far worse than the lack of the
books. If you *really* don't like "the borg" (and you really have a
valid complaint against them), it would seem simplier (to me) to report
the books as "stolen property", and pursue it either via the courts or
police. The sort of attention you might get from "the authorities" via
protesting would seem much more likely to be of the tear
gas/embarassment variety than anything actually beneficial to your
cause.
I would hope that you would have exhausted every avenue of peaceful
resolution before resorting to any such extreme measures, and I would
suggest preparing yourself for the possibility that it turns out the
book has been peed upon by the family dog, partially burnt, or
accidently sent to saudia arabia, and is therefore permamently unusable
and/or unavailable.
|
goroke
|
|
response 15 of 90:
|
Jul 22 23:32 UTC 1996 |
Marcus, read response #9 for the answer to your question, since you obviously
missed it the first go 'round. All you have to do is type "only 9" at the
"Respond or pass?" prompt.
Or take a look at the Policy conference on M-net. Craig has been with-holding
the books from Dave Cahill since the last election. Before that, he failed
to turn them over to the previous Arbornet Treasurer.
|
draven
|
|
response 16 of 90:
|
Jul 23 05:34 UTC 1996 |
Marcus is right. A protest is not the best approach if you still care
about M-Net.
Since I assume you are not a member, recalls and court orders are
pretty much out. Have you contacted the IRS about tax fraud yet? The
IRS would have a field day nit-picking at Arbornet.
|
goroke
|
|
response 17 of 90:
|
Jul 23 07:41 UTC 1996 |
"A protest is not the best approach if you still care about M-net."
"The IRS would have a field day nit-picking at Arbornet."
So, siccing the IRS on Arbornet is better for the welfare of M-net than an
informational picket? Hell, I wouldn't wish the IRS on my worst enemy.
|
void
|
|
response 18 of 90:
|
Jul 23 09:21 UTC 1996 |
i'm not so sure a picket is a wise idea. and as far as i can tell, dpc is
the third treasurer to whom craig has failed to relinquish the books. i think
the best way to get the books and other arbornet-related documents out of
craig's hands is via court order, and then follow that up by removing him as
president of arbornet so that he doesn't abscond with them again. picketing
the arbornet art fair booth is, imnsho, an ill-thought-out, knee-jerk
reaction to a problem which needs to be resolved through proper
channels.
|
goroke
|
|
response 19 of 90:
|
Jul 23 10:47 UTC 1996 |
Well, I'll be sure to think next time before I venture an opinion. My
apologies for offending your sensibilities.
|
mdw
|
|
response 20 of 90:
|
Jul 23 18:37 UTC 1996 |
(Evidently goroke doesn't remember what questions I asked, what he said
in #9, or who wrote PicoSpan. Fascinating.)
Wow, so Craig is still president, eh? I can't imagine anyone wanting to
take on the job of being treasurer in such circumstances.
|
draven
|
|
response 21 of 90:
|
Jul 23 18:54 UTC 1996 |
#17:
The IRS discovering Arbornet would probably result in the swift
dissolution of Arbornet. All of its assets would then be given to
another 501(c)(3), such as HVCN. If you picket, you'll help slowly drain
their bank account, at which point they'll start selling off equipment.
By the time they actually dissolve, the money will be gone, along with
most of M-Net.
|
pfv
|
|
response 22 of 90:
|
Jul 23 22:46 UTC 1996 |
I don't believe that Arbonet would be either allowed or in a postion to
sell diddly, if the IRS got involved - I seem to recall such events
generally result in a 'lock-down' on assets, paperwork and whatever -
including the finances.
If anyone wants to get serious, "aaron" gave me the data required to
contact the IRS several weeks ago.. I can post it here or email it, but I
myself am totally uninterested in bothering: when their are patrons,
staffers and lawyers already pissed off, I feel it is their obligation to
do something.
Of course, I rather feel that the entire thing is a lost cause - no one
wants to make the first move and this includes Borg, Staff, Patron and
Members - not to mention the various 'professionals' that regularly
comment on mnut.
It still boils down to the idea that a Coup d'tat (sic?) seems to be
required just to get the Mnet system (not the imaginary Mnet Corp(se)) to
operate properly and in/with good faith..
Too, it is fascinating that major issues are discussed here and not really
on Mnut anymore... Like maybe the Borg is gonna' listen here anymore than
there!?!
|
goroke
|
|
response 23 of 90:
|
Jul 24 00:22 UTC 1996 |
I remember precisely who wrote PicoSpan, Marcus. My response was snide --
far more so than I had intended. This matter has been such a source of
aggravation for so long that I have taken to snarling at everyone. And I went
back and re-read my previous response before I referenced it. And I am
dropping the subject, as I frankly no longer care. My apologies for my
rudeness. M-net's politics bring out the worst in me. And others.
|
krc
|
|
response 24 of 90:
|
Jul 24 04:33 UTC 1996 |
Does anyone know if I, as a member of the Audit Committee, can begin court
action to get the books from Craig? I am a member, but since the Board
changed the by-laws so only Arbornet members may vote I didn't think I had
the standing to do this. Now that I've been appointed to the Audit Committee
my standing has changed. If, in fact, I now have the authority to do so, I
would not hesitate to commence such action.
|