You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   500-524   525-549   550-574   575-599   600-624   625-649   650-674 
 675-699   700-724   725-749   750-774   775-799   800-824   825-849   850-874   875-899 
 900-924   925-949   950-974   975-999   1000-1007      
 
Author Message
jdg
Six letter word game Mark Unseen   Dec 8 03:16 UTC 1993

Mentioned in the "Letter Match" item:

51:184 Johann Hermann Remmers (remmers) Tue, Dec  7, 1993 (16:01)
 We could escalate the game and think of 6-letter words.

 . . . . 

I'm thinking of a six letter word.

1007 responses total.
rcurl
response 1 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 04:37 UTC 1993

New worlds to conquer!

worlds
srw
response 2 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 06:42 UTC 1993

revive
srw
response 3 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 06:48 UTC 1993

Take note that I have modified davel's awk script.
To produce accurate letter counting, run awk -f /u/srw/match.awk
remmers
response 4 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 10:46 UTC 1993

adjust
jdg
response 5 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 12:02 UTC 1993

I would use your match.awk, Steve, if permissions were set for me to use
it.  I'll start out doing this by hand.
jdg
response 6 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 12:03 UTC 1993

worlds 0 (rcurl)
revive 1 (srw)
adjust 0 (remers)
rcurl
response 7 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 14:04 UTC 1993

I am intrigued by why a 6-letter versionn of Letter Match has reignited
interest in the game, which in its 5-letter version was getting.....
shall we say, "old"? This is not an inquiry into the merits of the two
versions, but into the psychology of leaving the old for the new. I am
also intrigued by the as-yet unknown consequences of going to 6 letters,
while my pattern of approaching 5 letters was more-or-less settled. Is
this the same phenomenon that led people to leave the comfort of their
ordinary lives, to venture into new frontiers, be they the "West", or
"Space"? [Be that as it may, someone should give the coup de grace to
item 51, 5-Letter Match. If someone would enter the correct word, I
will freeze the Item, even short of a full Millennium.] Oh yes.....
  
should
remmers
response 8 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 18:31 UTC 1993

(Hey, if I *really* had wanted to leave the comfort of my ordinary
life, I'd have suggested going to FOUR-letter words...)

string
jdg
response 9 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 22:05 UTC 1993

should 0 (rcurl)
string 0 (remmers)
carl
response 10 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 8 22:47 UTC 1993

puzzle?
rcurl
response 11 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 05:49 UTC 1993

obtain
srw
response 12 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 06:45 UTC 1993

Re #5: Oops! The perms are fixed, sorry everyone.
/u/srw/match.awk can now be seen by all

Quoting liberally from davel's response 43:77

>For the sake of anyone who wants to use it, I've created an awk script
>to check for matches.  (I did this after I made a mistake.)  To run it,
>from a unix shell prompt enter
>awk -f /u/davel/match.awk
except now its's in /u/srw for the 6-letter version

>(and, of course, the output may be redirected to a file).  It will
>prompt you for the match word (that's the one everyone's trying to
>guess) and then for a succession of words & usernames.  It will generate
>lines of the general form we've been posting. Respond with a control-D
>or a single period to end entry.
srw
response 13 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 9 07:20 UTC 1993

hawker
jdg
response 14 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 02:37 UTC 1993

puzzle  1  (carl)
obtain  1  (rcurl)
hawker  1  (srw)
rcurl
response 15 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 05:16 UTC 1993

damagedamage
srw
response 16 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 06:46 UTC 1993

crunch
jdg
response 17 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 13:19 UTC 1993

damage  2  (rcurl)
crunch  0  (srw)
rcurl
response 18 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 10 14:17 UTC 1993

efface
rcurl
response 19 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 06:12 UTC 1993

Now, why did damage repeat itself? I didn't write it twice, and didn't
have ECHO ON (;->). 
jdg
response 20 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 11 16:29 UTC 1993

efface  1  (rcurl)
rcurl
response 21 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 13 14:10 UTC 1993

Steve, just because no one else wants to play, doesn't me we can't. Go
ahead - guess a word.
srw
response 22 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 06:39 UTC 1993

nature
rcurl
response 23 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 14:11 UTC 1993

faerie
aa8ij
response 24 of 1007: Mark Unseen   Dec 14 21:04 UTC 1993

sexton
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   475-499   500-524   525-549   550-574   575-599   600-624   625-649   650-674 
 675-699   700-724   725-749   750-774   775-799   800-824   825-849   850-874   875-899 
 900-924   925-949   950-974   975-999   1000-1007      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss