|
|
| Author |
Message |
slynne
|
|
Nutrition Tool
|
Mar 14 19:23 UTC 2007 |
I came across a pretty useful tool for anyone interested in diet and
nutrition. I had to do a diet analysis for school but I was also curious
about how bad my diet really is, especially since I have been trying to
eat intuitively.
The link is:
http://mypyramidtracker.gov/default.htm
This is a site where you can enter everything you eat in a day and get
nutritional information not just for one item but for one's entire day
of eating. If one does enough days, one can track trends. I kept a food
diary for a month. I wrote down every thing I ate, even if it was just
2-3 M&M's from the gumball machine at work.
What I found is that I eat about 80% of the calories that should
maintain my weight. Not surprising to me really. I have always known
that weight is more than just how many calories one eats. I still eat a
lot of calories though (an average of 2320 per day). My worst day had
almost 4000 calories and I had skipped breakfast! That's what eating
almost a whole large pepperoni pizza will do. go figure.
My total caloric percentages from carbohydrates, proteins, and fats are
as follows: Carbohydrates 56%; Proteins 13%; Fat 31%. These values do
not differ more than 2% from any of the USDA recommended percentages of
55% of calories from Carbohydrates, 15% of calories from proteins, and
30% of calories from fat.
Honestly, that kind of surprised me because I would have thought that I
eat way more fat than that. I am going to continue with the food diary
and see if I keep getting the same results.
Anyhow, I just wanted to share that tool for folks who are curious about
exactly what they eat.
|
| 41 responses total. |
furs
|
|
response 1 of 41:
|
Mar 15 00:02 UTC 2007 |
I use www.fitday.com to track mine. I average around 1800-2000 a day,
which I know is not enough, especially since I'm training to be in a
triathlon. But it's hard for me to eat more.
|
slynne
|
|
response 2 of 41:
|
Mar 15 00:52 UTC 2007 |
Jeanne? Do you find yourself feeling hungry a lot? If not, you are
probably eating enough.
A triathalon? That is sooooo awesome! When is it?
|
furs
|
|
response 3 of 41:
|
Mar 15 10:35 UTC 2007 |
well, the main one I've been training for is July 22. It's a 1/2 mile
swim, 12 mile bike and 3 mile run. But I'm doing a small indoor one
this weekend for training (it's 20 minutes swim, bike & run each
indoors) And my crazy cousin who talked me into this in the first place
has another one in mind in June that we might do. This one is a 1/4
mile swim, 10 mile bike and 3 mile run, so we might do it as practice.
Well, my rule is if I'm hungry I eat. So really the only time I get
super hungry is in the mornings when i wake up. So do feel like I'm
eating all the time, I eat about 6 meals a day. I'm sure I have days
that I eat more than 2000, but I think I had a couple this week where I
only had 1600. So it just depends on how I feel from day to day. But
I'm eating a lot of fruits and veggies so I feel like I"m eating a ton
of quantity.
|
mary
|
|
response 4 of 41:
|
Mar 15 12:32 UTC 2007 |
I too like fitday. All of these programs are a nice way to keep
portion-creep in check. I tend to fall into the pattern of
thinking I'm eating mostly healthy stuff, so I can eat all I want.
Wrong. It doesn't matter if it's ice cream or apples if
I'm eating more than what I'm burning, I'll be carrying
it around for a while.
I'll check out the link. Thanks, Lynne.
|
denise
|
|
response 5 of 41:
|
Mar 15 18:06 UTC 2007 |
Jeanne, that's so cool about doing the triathlons! Let us know when
and where and perhaps we can get a cheering section for you. :-)
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 6 of 41:
|
Jun 27 15:17 UTC 2007 |
View hidden response.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 7 of 41:
|
Jun 27 15:24 UTC 2007 |
Here's the abstract of the article in the hidden Response 6:
Portion-control dishes helped people with diabetes lose weight
Last Updated: Monday, June 25, 2007 | 4:29 PM ET
CBC News
"Eating from plates and cereal bowls marked to show portion sizes helped
people with diabetes to shed pounds comparable to the results of weight
loss drugs, researchers in Alberta found.
As well, more people who used the portion control plates 26 per cent
were also able to decrease their use of diabetes medications after six
months, compared with almost 11 per cent of those who did not receive
the special tableware."
I went online to take a look at the plates. Essentially they are
different diameter plates, with hand painted pictures and dividing lines
to show what to put on your plate, and how much space it should take up.
I've heard of a similar rule: 1/2 of plate geography for vegetables,
1/4 for breads/grains, and 1/4 for protein. Looking at this, I realized
that the difference in an 8-inch luncheon plate, a 10-inch dinner plate
and a 12-inch dinner plate can make a huge difference in how much you
consume at a meal.
Might be time to measure out portions (I'm with Mary on that, I have to
*constantly* retrain my eye to exactly what a 1/2 C serving looks like)
on my favorite plates and see which one is the best size to use in the
1/2, 1/4, 1/4 system.
|
edina
|
|
response 8 of 41:
|
Jun 27 15:25 UTC 2007 |
That's brilliant. I know that I have been working hard at reducing
portion size with my husband and I. What's funny is that he rarely
goes back for seconds...so I think a lot of it is visual.
|
slynne
|
|
response 9 of 41:
|
Jun 27 15:44 UTC 2007 |
I think that something like a plate that helps with portion control is
a good idea and certainly is better for one's health than other methods
such as weight loss drugs.
But I will point out a few things about this study that I think are
worth noting.
1. It was a six month study. I would like to see a more long term
study. There are many methods of losing weight that have some limited
success at six months. There are many fewer where the weight loss is
still present at one year and even fewer still where the weight loss is
still present at five years.
2. The average weight loss of 1.8 percent of body weight is about 5-6
pounds lost for a 300lb person. That really isnt much weight loss. I
wonder if portion control can help with diabetes even if one doesnt
lose weight?
3. While 1/4 of the patients in this study who used the plates were
able to decrease the use of diabetes meds, that is about 15% more than
would have been able to anyways even without special plates. I wouldnt
call that a wildly successful program although I am sure that the 15%
of people who found the plates helpful might disagree.
I think that since plates dont have side effects like other weight
loss methods do, at the very least one can say that the plates do no
harm and may do some very small amount of good.
|
mary
|
|
response 10 of 41:
|
Jun 27 16:35 UTC 2007 |
If I didn't make it an ongoing project to keep my weight down (as best I
can) (and it is work) I'd easily weigh 300 pounds. I'd be a very unhappy
person at that weight and I know my health, both physical and
emotional, would take a hit.
So how do I figure into your facts about dieting not working?
It works for me although imperfectly. But that's sure better than
not working at weight loss at all.
|
mary
|
|
response 11 of 41:
|
Jun 27 16:51 UTC 2007 |
When visiting Asheville, NC, last winter, I had lunch at a nice bistro.
On the dessert menu they offered a sundae with a clever name, which
escapes me now, but it came with its own dish that you could take home.
I was intrigued. My sundae came in a little dish (hold 1/2 cup). It has
a colorful fun glaze outside and inside around the rim it reads, "Yum time
is..." and on the very inside bottom, "over". The little card that came
with advised to take the dish home and use it for indulgent delights.
But "...don't overfill it and use it only once a day". I really enjoyed
that sundae. And you know what, when I'd eaten that 1/2 cup it was
enough. The taste had worked and more would have been out of habit. I
left satisfied and feeling I'd made good choices.
I wish more restaurants played with food so nicely.
|
slynne
|
|
response 12 of 41:
|
Jun 27 17:20 UTC 2007 |
resp:10 I am not convinced that you would weigh 300 lbs if you didnt
strictly control your food intake. But clearly you are convinced of
that and you know your body better than I do. Maybe you are one of
those 5% of people who have so much self control that they can beat the
odds. Maybe you are hungry all the time and it is only through serious
will power that you can keep yourself from eating more than you do. I
dont know.
I will say that most people tend to have a natural range and find it
just as difficult to gain enough weight to move out of that range as
they do to lose weight to move out of that range. There are things that
people can do to change their "set point" of course. But generally,
most people will not weigh 300 lbs even if they allow themselves to eat
as much as they want to eat. So where does your diet figure into the
idea of diets not working? Well, I suspect that if you were to just not
consciously pay attention to portions, you might gain some weight but
unless you started seriously overeating even when you're not hungry,
you probably wouldnt gain more than 5 pounds or so. Or maybe you would.
I dont really know. I can tell you that in the last three months, my
diet has been *really* bad due to outside factors. And by bad, I mean I
am eating fast food about 3 times a week which a pretty big increase. I
analized my calories on the cdc website and have been eating around
3000 calories a day which is 800 a day more than what I was eating
before. I have gained no weight. I expect to have more time soon and
will return to my old habits. I dont expect to lose weight but I do
expect to feel better.
Let me ask you this. Are you at a normal BMI or are you considered
overweight? And if you are overweight, why havent you changed your diet
such that you end up at a lower BMI?
FWIW, I have found that portion control has helped me with my eating. I
say this because I have a tendency to finish what is on my plate and I
am working on only eating when I am hungry. So I dole out small
portions but my rule is that if I am still hungry after I eat what is
on my plate, I can get seconds (or thirds or even fourths or fifths or
whatever). That does help me because I only get more if I am still
hungry. That is something different than being on a diet though, imho.
I dont restrict the amount of food I eat except that I am working on
reducing "emotional eating"
As for being unhealthy mentally and physically at 300 lbs. I can say
that I am not unhealthy at 300 lbs. I probably will eventually become
unhealthy but that pretty much happens to everybody as they get older
regardless of their weight. I dont think that weight increases the risk
of bad physical health significantly.
I do think that being heavy can be a blow to mental health. But it isnt
so much the weight that is the problem as people's reactions to it. But
ok, yes...being fat is hard and stressful and if a person internalizes
society's messages about fat=lazy, fat=sloth, fat=no willpower,
etc...then yes, being fat is a good way to feel shitty about oneself.
|
mary
|
|
response 13 of 41:
|
Jun 27 22:10 UTC 2007 |
Require an emergency appendectomy at 300 pounds and then tell me how
morbid obesity is healthy. It's a challenge to simply intubate someone
with such issues. Diagnosis gets trickier. Getting the wound to stay
closed and heal is dicey. And emergency surgery is just one example. 300
pounds comes with issues you don't have at 150. But we've had this
conversation before.
I have been heavier and I know I'll always need to be paying attention
to diet if I don't want to go there again. And I don't. And there is
something else too, something I don't quite know how to explain, but
I feel better about myself for trying to be as healthy as I can, even
knowing I'll never make it to ideal.
But there is that word healthy again. I tend to link weight to
health. You don't. We'll simply have to agree to disagree I guess.
|
furs
|
|
response 14 of 41:
|
Jun 27 22:23 UTC 2007 |
I agree with mary, because for me personally I do have to work at not
being 300 lbs. Been there, but not for 15 years. I did let a few more
pounds add up over the past 10 years, but over the last 2 years have
taken that back off. I won't call it a battle, because I'm a lover not
a fighter. It's just something I'll keep an eye on for all my life,
because I am not happy at a higher weight. I am happiest now.
|
slynne
|
|
response 15 of 41:
|
Jun 28 01:52 UTC 2007 |
I will agree with Mary that fat people simply do not get as good of
medical care as thin people for various reasons from prejudice in the
health care community against fat to the technology and techniques being
generally focused on people of more normal weights. As the average
weight is increasing though, I suspect that the technology will catch up
and there will be better machines for diagnosis and better treatments. I
also hope that once people start talking about fat issues some of the
negative feelings about fat people and just fat in general will go away
which would certainly address the issues with medical professionals and
any care differentials that they might give.
But as usual, I will invite anyone to answer a question:
1. What is the risk of being 100 lbs overweight?
Is it as bad as tobacco where 50% of smokers will have smoking related
illnesses that will shorten their lives by an average of 12 years?
The best answer I have gotten is that being 100 lbs overweight for a
woman doubles the chances of death at any given time compared to a
normal weight woman. Being 10 lbs underweight is even worse. But that
statistic has lots of flaws because it doesnt control for anything. It
counts all deaths for any reason and doesnt even mention what the risks
of death are in the first place. So it is double of WHAT? I could go on
but I wont. I have also heard that a morbidly obese woman's chances of
dying are about the same as a normal weight man's chances of dying.
Anyways, my feelings generally are that I try not to judge other
people's choices about what they do to their body or what they eat even
when I dont agree with them. I think that Americans get really moral
about food and bodies and such and I just dont like that. I have nothing
against anyone's decision to go on a diet or to lose weight. Well, Ok,
I'll admit that whenever someone tells me they are going on a diet, I
think that it is a shame because they are almost certain to fail and
then will feel bad and I will admit that I have to bite my tongue so I
dont point that out to them. I am always happy when folks do lose weight
and keep it off if that is what they wanted to do.
I also dont like that "health" is often an excuse used to discriminate
against fat people. That statistic I have heard that a morbidly obese
woman has the same chance of dying as a normal weight man really brought
a lot of the fat prejudice home to me. Because no one is saying that men
need to be become women for their health in the same way that people
insist that fat people become thin people. If health were really the
issue, then men should be treated the same as fat people. I dont expect
to see a special male-to-female sex change hospital to open in our area
any time soon in the way that an entire hospital in Ypsi is devoted to
bariatric surgery.
And fwiw, I am not happy being at my weight either. But it isnt for
health reasons. It is pretty for the same reason that I am glad I am not
a Mexican illegal alien or a black person or Asian or gay. It is because
being in a class of people who are discriminated against and judged all
the time really sucks. It is stressful.
|
furs
|
|
response 16 of 41:
|
Jun 28 10:47 UTC 2007 |
I am not happy when I'm heavier not because of health reasons, but it's
because I just don't feel good when I'm bigger and I am more depressed
(though I'm not really a depressed person, I can tell a difference in
hind-sight of how I was really kind of depressed). I just feel
better. I strive to stay thinner because of health, though. I maybe
wrong, but it is my feeling that I am much healthier now than I was
120lbs ago. If I am wrong, then I don't really care, because I am
happier this way anyway.
I do agree that fat people totally get discriminated against, because I
have experienced it first hand.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 17 of 41:
|
Jun 28 13:16 UTC 2007 |
resp:15 One thing I think you've totally overlooked in Mary's post was
not that the technology was the problem in medical care- but the obese
person's body! A seriously obese person simply doesn't heal wounds as
well as someone of a smaller size. That has nothing to do with medical
technology and everything to do with being obese.
Sure there are medical technologies that could be improved- I guess-
like stronger ultrasounds so that doctors could get a clearer image
underneath all the fat layers. But the question I have is- at what cost?
Would the stronger ultrasound waves have more negative, damaging effects?
It's good that you hold your tongue when someone tells you they're going
on a diet- because adding negativity only makes the situation worse.
There's nothing as bad as telling someone you want to try something only
to have them tell you not to bother because you'll fail. You know what-
maybe they will join that 5% that actually manages to lose weight and
maintain it. It sounds like there are at least a couple people on this
board that have managed to lose weight and maintain it for years.
I've stated many times that I want to lose weight- the reason is that
that I will be healthier. Can you currently run up a couple flights of
stairs without being out of breath? I'm currently at the heaviest I've
ever been (thanks in part to metabolism changes after I quit smoking),
although I'm no where near 300 lbs, and what I don't like is that
certain things ARE harder. Sitting on the floor and getting up is still
doable, but it used to be easier. My knees are also starting to
complain, and would cause problems if I weighed more than I do. These
things just aren't good health-wise, even if my cholesterol is at good
levels and my blood preassure is fabulous.
You mentioned the health risks with smoking- and there is one main
comonality between obesity and smoking- both are a choice.
|
slynne
|
|
response 18 of 41:
|
Jun 28 13:43 UTC 2007 |
resp:16 WEll, I always say that if what you are doing makes you happy,
then it doesnt matter. This is why I bite my tongue when people talk to
me about homeopathic remedies that have no basis in science. IF it
makes them feel better and healthier than more power to them. I mean
what you are doing is making you feel good, Jeanne. So there is NOTHING
wrong with that. And for all I know, for you, being thinner is
healthier. Everyone is different and everyone needs to make their own
choices.
Part of the issue is that certain behaviors which are healthy cause
people to lose weight which puts them at the lower end of their natural
range. But is the weight loss itself that is healthy or is it the
getting off the couch which is healthy? No one really knows for sure.
The only study I have seen that corrects for things like activity
levels showed that fat active people were more healthy than thin
inactive people.
But of course we could go around and around on this issue. Unlike the
tobacco issue or global warming, there is no scientific concensious
about the effects of obesity. There are studies that show it is bad,
there are studies that show only really extreme obesity is bad, there
are studies that show being between 1-100 lbs overweight is GOOD, etc.
None of the media reporting on the subject seems to give meaningful
statistics. Usually they say things like "Obesity increases risk of
breast cancer" without mentioning what the increased risk is.
Anyways, one of the things I find interesting is a debate going on in
the "fat blogosphere" about how to handle the health issue. There are
people who want to get the message out that being fat is usually not
unhealthy (i.e. fat is a state of being, behaviors are healthy or
unhealthy) and that you cant tell a person's health by their weight.
And there are those people who say that the whole health issue is a way
for anti-fat people to frame the arguement in terms of a different form
of discrimination and moral judgement (healthy vs. unhealthy) and this
is wrong because even if a fat person has bad behaviors and unheathly
habits, they still deserve the same dignity and treatment as other
people in our society.
Anyways, one of my favorite bloggers has a post about just this issue
which I ran across last night. She says things a lot better than I can
http://kateharding.net/but-dont-you-realize-fat-is-unhealthy/
resp:17
Ok, I will accept that fat people dont heal quite as well as thin
people. But in the grand scheme of things, that isnt a big risk. I will
also accept that fat people are more likely to have certain joint
problems later in life (although less likely to have them than
athletes). But I imagine that surgical techniques could be developed to
make healing go better for fat people and I also imagine that medical
technology can help with a lot of the joint problems people are likely
to encounter.
I do, btw, understand the economics of it all. Such a small percentage
of people are over a 100lbs overweight that it probably wouldnt be in
the best interests of medicine to focus on fat people. As our
population gets fatter though, I expect more resources will be devoted
to such things.
I know it is good that I bite my tongue when people tell me they are
going on a diet. For all I know they might be one of the 5% who
actually lose weight and keep it off. They might even be like Jeanne
who has lost a LOT of weight and kept it off for years and years. Of
course it is possible for people to lose weight. I wish that people
would give me the same courtesy when I talk about my decision NOT to
try to lose weight. It is a rational decision. I sometimes really start
to feel some of the fat community cliches in situations like that. Like
the one about how being fat and happy with one's body is a radical act.
It drives people NUTS. seriously. If I say: "I like my body. It is
healthy. I dont think I am ugly" and so on, there are always tons of
people who go out of their way to tell me I am wrong WRONG wrong.
Obesity is not a choice though. Obesity is a state of being. Smoking is
a behavior. They are quite different. I kind of like thinking of
obesity like gender. A person can change their gender if they wish. But
there simply isnt the social pressure to do it. Why not? Because we see
gender as a state of being and not a choice. Technically, though it IS
a choice. Just like obesity is a choice. Actually, I might even
theorize that it is easier to change gender than it is to change body
mass.
As for my personal health issues. Well, no. I can run up two flights of
stairs. Mostly that is due to a couple of injuries though. I dont get
winded when I climb stairs. My knees hurt too but again, that seems
more related to injury than weight or at least I think so because my
knees have been getting better. I might have healed more quickly if I
were thinner I suppose.
None of that matters. What it would take for *me* to become a thin
person is not healthy for *me*. What you do to become thinner may or
may not be healthy for *you*
|
slynne
|
|
response 19 of 41:
|
Jun 28 13:45 UTC 2007 |
Oh yeah, and btw, Anne...congratulations on quitting smoking. Most
people who quit smoking gain weight and even though they do, they are
still generally healthier than people who continue to smoke.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 20 of 41:
|
Jun 28 18:15 UTC 2007 |
Just to make sure something gets recognized first off- I really don't
think you're at ALL ugly. Okay? :) I don't think weight makes a person
ugly. I do think being overweight is unhealthy- but it doesn't make a
person ugly.
As for the risks with healing- I must disagree. When you heal more
slowly- and that includes the way your skin heals from cuts/incisions-
you seriously leave the body open to infection. And a lot more visits to
the doctor's office to check on the wound, and lots on bandaging, etc.
To be honest one of the problems I have with "diets" is their
suggestions to eat 'lite' foods and what not- and quite frankly, I don't
trust all those chemicals. Butter may not have the right level of
calories- but at least I have a much better idea of what's in it. So
yes, hubby and I use butter in our cooking. Plus I just think it tastes
better.
My theory is all about moderation. I would rather eat smaller portions
of good foods rather than perhaps larger portions with chemicals I can't
pronounce. ;) Overeating is a problem for many people- which is why I'm
trying to be more aware of portion size AND get this 'must clean off my
plate' idea out of my head.
As for activities- I do want to be more active, be able to take the dog
for long walks, maybe even run a little. These things should not be
impossible, or terribly difficult.
|
slynne
|
|
response 21 of 41:
|
Jun 28 19:13 UTC 2007 |
If you dont think fat is ugly, you are probably different than most
people. And good for you! Personally, I have found that changing my own
personal views about what is beautiful has not only helped with my own
self esteem but has helped me really appreciate other people.
If the only health risk actually caused by obesity is slowness in
healing after surgery, that really isnt much of a risk. It certainly is
something I can live with. I am conceding that point for the sake of
arguement mostly because it really doesnt matter. Saying that there are
health risks associated with obesity is very much like saying that
there are health risks associated with any other human state of being.
There are health risks associated with being black, with being poor,
with being less educated, with being male, etc. It is only in the case
of obesity where society has decided (without much evidence, btw) that
losing weight and changing the state of being will improve health.
As it happens. I think moderation is a good thing. I have been working
on not overeating for a while now as I have discussed here before. I
have had some limited success in that department in that I seem to have
a more normalized outlook on food than I did before. I even leave food
on my plate sometimes! I agree with you wholeheartedly that overeating
is a problem for many people. But overeating is a behavior. Being more
active is a behavior. Obesity is a state of being. There are many
normal weight people who overeat and dont exercise and there are many
overweight people who dont. You can NOT tell a person's behaviors by
looking at their body except in extreme cases.
|
denise
|
|
response 22 of 41:
|
Jun 29 21:10 UTC 2007 |
I don't have a whole lot of time to post right now but here are just a
few random thoughts for right now...
For me, though I've been at a 'normal/recommended' weight in the past,
its been so many years that I don't exactly remember what its like.
Over the years--since HS, I've gained weight at various rates, have
lost some weight multiple times during all these years but have gained
it all back plus some.
There's a number of factors that come into play, I'm sure. Stressors
for one thing [starting college, getting married, subsequent bad
marriage and divorce, multiple deaths in the family for various
reasons, etc etc etc]. Activity level has also fluctuated over the
years as well. However, I've gained the most weight [with a little bit
of ups and downs] since 2000 when I had to go on disability for awhile.
I was hospitalized a number of times and have been on a variety of
medications, adding some, deleting some, based on what works, what
didn't, what had bad side effects, etc. I do need to be on some
medication for the long haul [as do a number of people for a variety of
disorders]. And many of these can lead to weight gain and great
difficulty in losing it again [but the meds are needed].
And yep, there is a lot of negative connotations from the general
public for people 'of size' [too 'thin' and too 'fat']... It's one of
the visable predjudisms [I know that's not spelled right] still out
there in a big way [no pun inteaded]. However, that's also true with
non-visable issues, too. I have a disability that people can't visably
see but my disorder has been joked about, commented negatively about,
lack of knowledge about, stigma, etc etc. So for both issues, I
have 'issues' with the general public. Sometimes I try to educate the
people/public, other times its not worth the time/hastle at the time
the juegments are made. And sometimes I want my privacy protected...
[more soon]
|
denise
|
|
response 23 of 41:
|
Jun 29 21:24 UTC 2007 |
Negative connotations about being overweight have been an issue even in
my family. Lots of harmful and hurtful comments and suggestions [some
were meant to help, I'm sure, but many were not]. So even when I had
some weight issues as a kid, I haven't been comfortable with the size
issue since I *was* treated so differently, even within my family. My
older sister had the opposite issue, she was always underweight yet
that was viewed as a good thing. Yet she had a number of health issues,
including many associated with being fat [and she did die of cancer at
the age of 49].
So my self-image has most always been not very high. There have been
times where I've been ok with my size [not 'embarrassed' by it or
didn't see it in a negative way]. But lately, I've been going through
one of my phases where I'm not happy with my appearance size-wise, even
though I've lost a fair amount of weight over the past 6 months, even
though I do feel good about the pounds lost. But I also wonder when
its going to pile back on again as it has so many times in the past. I
*am* doing some stuff to maintain or lose but overall, am not doing
enough. I get so tired of the critisism from so many people about what
I should or shouldn't be doing, health wise. There's only so much one
can do at any time in life without getting to overwhelmed with the act
of balancing one's life and other basic functions and necessities for
survival.
Ok, I'm drifting here, aren't I? I have more thoughts to post put its
about time to head out to this evening's HH! :-)
|
slynne
|
|
response 24 of 41:
|
Jun 30 13:16 UTC 2007 |
I think that it is very common for fat people to internalize messages
that our culture gives about fat people. They learn that fat people dont
look good or that fat people cant possibly be healthy, and so on. Once a
person honestly starts to believe those things, OF COURSE they feel bad
when they are fat and feel good when they are thin. That so few fat
people ever become thin people even with that kind of belief system says
a lot to me.
|