|
|
| Author |
Message |
polygon
|
|
More news from Bosnia
|
Apr 2 20:39 UTC 1993 |
Speech given by Mr. Andras Riedlmayer in Boston on 3/20/93:
My name is Andras Riedlmayer. I am a librarian at Harvard's Fine Arts
Library and I would like to explain why I came to be here today.
When the bloodshed started in Bosnia a little less than a year ago, I
stood by and watched--like the rest of the world--as an urbane,
civilized community in the heart of Europe began to be torn to shreds
in front of millions of television viewers. I may have been following
events more closely than some, because I have a personal connection--
having travelled and done research in that part of the world. Since
my work involves the documentation of historic art and architecture, I
also felt a special sense of loss when I saw the first pictures of
medieval buildings in Sarajevo and other Bosnian towns reduced to
rubble by Serbian artillery fire. Still, it somehow did not seem
right to grieve for bricks and stones when human beings were suffering
and dying.
Then, in early summer came the news that the Serbs had blown up the
picturesque old town of Mostar, destroying its cathedral, its many
beautiful mosques and all but one of its famous old bridges. In late
August we saw the National and University Library in Sarajevo being
shelled for three days with incendiary grenades. Despite the heroic
efforts of firefighters and volunteers, the building burned to the
ground and one of the great libraries of Europe went up in flames--
over 1.5 million books and manuscripts were lost, wiping out much of
the written record of Bosnia's history.
It soon became clear that what we are witnessing is not merely
"collateral damage" incidental to the general mayhem of warfare.
Early last September, BBC reporter Kate Adie interviewed Serbian
gunners on the hillsides overlooking Sarajevo and asked them why they
had shelled the one hotel in town that housed all of the foreign
correspondents. The Serbian officer commanding the guns apologized,
saying they had not intended to hit the hotel, but had been aiming at
the roof of the National Museum behind it. The gunners soon improved
their aim, and the museum, and its unique Bosnian folklore collection,
is no more.
The Serbian nationalists' aim was and remains to wipe out any physical
evidence that could remind us that people other than Serbs ever lived
in Bosnia and Hercegovina. It is to this end that Muslim mosques,
Roman Catholic churches, Jewish cemeteries, and all of the country's
libraries, archives, and museums are being torched, dynamited and
bulldozed even as we speak. The practitioners of ethnic cleansing are
not content to terrorize and kill the living; they want to eliminate
all memory of the past as well.
|
| 82 responses total. |
polygon
|
|
response 1 of 82:
|
Apr 2 22:00 UTC 1993 |
This item linked from Agora 14 to History 22.
|
ecl
|
|
response 2 of 82:
|
Apr 3 05:43 UTC 1993 |
The Big Brother history revision method in action.
|
tsty
|
|
response 3 of 82:
|
Apr 3 08:15 UTC 1993 |
And I thought I felt ill before I read this.
|
tnt
|
|
response 4 of 82:
|
Apr 3 14:13 UTC 1993 |
Nuke them all, & let their deities sort them out.
|
jrg
|
|
response 5 of 82:
|
Apr 3 18:22 UTC 1993 |
The victors always get to write the history books. But it doesn't mean
I have to like it. So what should the stance of the rest of the
"civilized" (and I do use the term loosely) world be?
|
arthur
|
|
response 6 of 82:
|
Apr 3 18:33 UTC 1993 |
Today's NYT reported that the 'legislative' body for the
Bosnian Serbs completely rejected the Vance-Owen proposal
in any form, even though their leader had accepted it
providing that some parts could be changed. One of the
legislators was quoted as saying that we (the Serbs) should
just seize the territory we want by military force. (I don't
remember the exact quote.)
The Serbs are completely intransigent. We have only
two real alternatives -- let them completely slaughter the
Bosnian Moslems and Croats, or intervene. Half measures
like the ones we have been taking will only prolong the
agony.
|
danr
|
|
response 7 of 82:
|
Apr 3 19:05 UTC 1993 |
I tend to agree, but where does it stop? After Yugoslavia, we'll have
to go somewhere in Africa, then somewhere in Asia, then somewhere else
undoubtedly. It's not that I'm against it, but it's going to be a real
quagmire.
|
tsty
|
|
response 8 of 82:
|
Apr 3 19:12 UTC 1993 |
CroMagnon mentality has always been a quagmire.
|
steve
|
|
response 9 of 82:
|
Apr 3 20:55 UTC 1993 |
It is seeing things like this that gives me just the slightest
amount of sympathy for the old Soviet government. I sure don't know
what the solution is, other than to airlift anyone out of the country
who'd like to, and let the warring factions turn each other into ashes.
|
gregor
|
|
response 10 of 82:
|
Apr 3 22:12 UTC 1993 |
What is wrong with these people? While I realize that this is too simplistic,
I cannot understand why these people go on destroying everything. I mean,
when they are done, there will be nothing left for the "victors." Sorry
for any offense to the Wolverine fans...
What is in thhe heads of peoople that engage in this kind of behavior. It's
like they have no brains: no self control...
|
kentn
|
|
response 11 of 82:
|
Apr 4 04:21 UTC 1993 |
What is in their heads? Scorched earth...
|
rcurl
|
|
response 12 of 82:
|
Apr 4 06:17 UTC 1993 |
Its religion. The Serbs are eastern orthodox, the Bosnians islam, and
the Croatians Roman Catholic. They have been slaughtering each other
for centuries because of differences of opinion about mythology - and,
of course, hatred created by the fact they have been slaughtering each
other for centuries. Since the whole mess is based on religions all of
which *teach* things like "do unto others....", charity, life is sacred,
it is astonishing that the hatred is considered compatible with that,
and that the religious leaders condone this very nonreligious behavior.
|
polygon
|
|
response 13 of 82:
|
Apr 4 07:05 UTC 1993 |
Re 12. Um, wrong. They have *not* been "slaughtering each other for
centuries." That is a myth. The Great Powers sometimes fought over
pieces of the Balkans, but full scale ethnic war between the Serbs,
Croats, etc., dates really only to World War I.
|
polygon
|
|
response 14 of 82:
|
Apr 4 07:10 UTC 1993 |
For those who'd like to know about the war in former Yugoslavia beyond
the myths and slogans and conventional wisdom, I recommend the recent
article in "Foreign Affairs" by ... um ... I forget the name, but I'll
find the cite and post it. Also, an interesting article appeared recently
in the Washington Post titled "The Balkan Quagmire Myth" which debunks a
lot of the things that have been repeated here and elsewhere. The latter
was posted on the other system.
|
jeffk
|
|
response 15 of 82:
|
Apr 4 07:35 UTC 1993 |
Maybe this war is a positive thing. Natural selection taking over. All of
the petty, hating types will be killed off, leaving the peoples who just
want to live peacefully alive. Displaced, but alive. Many innocents will
lose their lives, but there are MANY parellels between today and the
beginnings of World War I. The archduke Ferdinand was assasinated in
Bosnia, in Sarajevo, by a Serb who was angry with his ethnic neighbors.
Does this sound at all familiar? Now, the empires and center of power is
no longer in west-central Europe, but with our mobility, its not that far
off. I can easily see how some kind of well-intentioned UN-sanctioned
action could get blown way out of proportion and end up a big conflict. To
convince yourself, just spend a few minutes pondering the consequences of
Russia siding with the Serbs, which they have historically done. Scary.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 16 of 82:
|
Apr 4 14:13 UTC 1993 |
Re 13: The Latin (Roman) world invaded the easter (Moslem) through the
11th to 13th centuries, in the Crusades. The Moslems returned the favor
several times, overrunning Constantinople, and the surrounding lands. The
Latin and Eastern (orthodox) catholic worlds got involved too, as the Latin
church tried to conquer the Eastern church "en route" to "ethinically clean"
the holy land. The Eastern church didn't have the resources to return the
favor, but they wanted to. (My memory of the details of all this,
originally acquired from Gibbons, is now a bit rusty, but these people
*were* slaughtering each other practically from the day the different
churches arose.)
|
arthur
|
|
response 17 of 82:
|
Apr 4 19:52 UTC 1993 |
Re: #15 It's not killing off the hateful types. Murder and
slaughter just creates and reinforces hate and revenge. It's
getting rid of the people who advocate peace and tolerance,
because there seems to be less and less reason (there) to
accept peace with those who would slaughter your friends
and family.
|
polygon
|
|
response 18 of 82:
|
Apr 4 20:05 UTC 1993 |
Re 16. The Roman Church and the Ottoman Empire are kind of what I meant
by the Great Powers. Serbs and Croats in the Balkans lived in peace with
each other for centuries before World War I.
|
rogue
|
|
response 19 of 82:
|
Apr 4 20:38 UTC 1993 |
#12: Hatred and violence has always been compatible with religion.
I think the Serbs as opposed to the plan because it gives less territory to the
Serbs than the Serbs have in possesion (conquered) right now. Similar to the
Persian Gulf crisis, a very important question right now is, "Are the Serbs
reasonable -- are they willing to negotiate and compromise." The answer in
the Persian Gulf was, "No, Saddam is not willing to compromise at all -- he
*wants* war." The answer from the Serbs is coming perilously close to Saddam's
answer, and foreign intervention seems inevitable.
|
polygon
|
|
response 20 of 82:
|
Apr 4 20:38 UTC 1993 |
As for the possibility of a wide-scale conflict starting in the Balkans:
yes, the possibility is quite real and taken seriously. Most of the
concern focuses on the Serbian province of Kosovo.
Kosovo is cherished by Serbian nationalists as some kind of historic
heartland of Serbia. However, it adjoins Albania, and the population
of Kosovo is more than 90% ethnic Albanians (and has been that way for
generations or centuries). Kosovo had some limited autonomy within
the context of the Yugoslav federation, even though it was officially
part of Serbia.
With the coming of Serbian nationalist hysteria in 1990-91, the Serbian
government unilaterally revoked all self-government in Kosovo, fired
all non-Serbs from government jobs, closed all non-Serbian schools and
universities, shut down all Albanian-language media, declared martial
law, and sent more than 100,000 troops to enforce it. Around the same
time, Kosovo declared independence from Serbia, although the Kosovars had
no weapons to put this into effect.
Since that time, Kosovo has been a very tense place. The troops have
made life difficult for the ethnic Albanian majority there, including
many beatings and occasional killings of people who just happen to pass
on the street. Heavy weapons have been moved in to surround Pristina and
other Kosovo towns. The Serbian nationalist parties are clamoring for
the expulsion of all non-Serbs from Kosovo, an ethnic cleansing project
which would generate about a million refugees and/or dead.
It is generally understood in military and diplomatic circles that the
slaughter and displacement of ethnic Albanians would force Albania to
enter the war; Macedonia also has a large Albanian minority which would
probably also rush to Kosovo's defense. In the meantime, many of the
refugees would end up in Macedonia (already destabilized by Bulgarian
and Greek hostility over whether it has a right to exist) and spread
the war there as well. Independent media in Belgrade have found plans
by the Serbian government to invade Macedonia and/or divide it with
Greece. Bulgaria and Turkey have warned that they could not possibly
tolerate this. There's more, but the bottom line is a large and spreading
war.
With all this in mind, George Bush actually found enough backbone to
issue a threat to Milosevic: ethnic cleansing in Kosovo would be met
with direct U.S. military involvement. Not "Oh, we'll consult with
the UN and maybe tighten sanctions or something" but the equivalent
of "War against Kosovo's population will be met with the U.S. Marines."
Clinton has reiterated this; the threat continues in effect.
Think about it: two successive U.S. presidents have promised direct
involvement of U.S. troops in a portion of Serbia itself. (Bosnia, by
contrast, has never been a part of Serbia.)
Funny thing! The Serbian troops in Kosovo (though being very repressive)
have behaved themselves. Ethnic cleansing is not taking place.
|
gregor
|
|
response 21 of 82:
|
Apr 5 01:49 UTC 1993 |
Why do I have to live on the same planet with these people!?
|
jeffk
|
|
response 22 of 82:
|
Apr 5 02:28 UTC 1993 |
Why are we considered of the same species?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 23 of 82:
|
Apr 5 03:07 UTC 1993 |
It is a trait of our species to devolve into clans - to "balkanize" - at
the drop of a hat or the word of a demagogue, on bases of opinion,
land claims, skin color, or just greed. No other species does this. It is
all the fault of "evolution"...8-(.
|
danr
|
|
response 24 of 82:
|
Apr 5 11:21 UTC 1993 |
At our cores, we're all still animals.
|