You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-42         
 
Author Message
rcurl
BATTERIES Mark Unseen   Jan 20 06:55 UTC 1995

Let's get a charge out of batteries.
42 responses total.
rcurl
response 1 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 07:02 UTC 1995

Why 13.8 volts? My HT batteries have charging ports that say "13.8 volts".
I have never seen a labeled 13.8 volt source for charging. I have measured
something above 13 volts from a 12 volt (car) battery, and I have a "CB
Power Supply" that is stated to provide "13.7 to 14.5 volts". I have also
charged one of those NICADS that say they want "13.8 volts" by plugging
them into a car cigarette lighter (overnight - engine off). So, what gives
with that "13.8 volts? Does it really mean what it says? I've never heard
of a wall-adapter rated for 13.8 v (though you can get them rated 14
volts). So, what's going on here, and why? 

mdw
response 2 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 08:35 UTC 1995

Lead-acid batteries are only nominally 12 volts.  The exact voltage
depends on how charged the battery is, on recent charge/discharge
history, and the temperature of the battery.  This leads to a "cold
start" trick - if the battery is weak, and doesn't have quite enough
oomph to start the car, turn the headlights on for 30 seconds, then turn
them off & try again.  The drain on the battery will heat the battery
up, which may raise its voltage enough to enable the car to be started.
Automotive electrical systems usually "float" on the battery, so the
exact voltage depends mainly on that.

The generator (or alternator on most modern automobiles) is responsible
for charging the battery, but the battery must also not be overcharged -
attempts to do that actually produce steam, hydrogen, and oxygen.  The
latter two can actually produce an explosive mixture, while all of these
use up the water in the battery.  Fortunately, it's easy to determine
the state of charge in the battery, so a simple voltage regulator
suffices.  I believe a quiescent fully charged battery at room
temperature is about 13.8 V.  The voltage regulator will probably try
for about 14.1 V.  A nearly discharged battery may read 12 V.  Even a
completely discharged battery may read 9 V under no load circumstances.
This can result in odd behavior if the battery is nearly dead - for
instance, the instrument panel lights may light up as expected (only
slightly dimmer), but as soon as the starter is engaged only a click
from the starter solenoid may be heard.  If the battery doesn't have
enough oomph even to keep the solenoid closed, a rapid series of clicks
may be heard instead.  In many cars, the "battery" light on the
instrument car is an essential part of the charging circut - and must be
replaced if it does not light when the ignition is turned on.
scg
response 3 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 05:10 UTC 1995

When using that trick of turning the headlights on to warm the battery, it
is a good idea to do it only to batteries that otherwise work well.  I had
a battery for a while that would tend to completely die anytime it had a
lot of trouble starting the car, and turning the headligyhts on while it
was having problems would drain it very quickly.  OTOH, the battery that
replaced that one works much better.  I left the lights on with the car
turned off for three hours today (by accident) and the car didn't even
hesitate when I started it.
rcurl
response 4 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 06:50 UTC 1995

Marcus' comments are pretty reasonable. However, how did ICOM (and others)
settle upon specifically "13.8" to have embossed on their equipment, when
it is undoubtedly a range of voltages that can be accepted? The manual
even says "connect an external 13.8V DC power source" when, at least
literally, there is no such thing. Here's a related question: these
battery packs have two charging jacks - one for a wall-adapter for
charging, and the other for "13.8V". I know the former has the charge
limiting circuit in the adapter, and the latter in the battery pack, but
why provide both? A "13.8V" wall-adapter would suffice. 

mdw
response 5 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 08:39 UTC 1995

At a shear guess - it may be historical.  The "wall adapter" may have
come first, followed later by the "13.8v" connector.  Or, the two may
have originally started with two different companies, and both may have
then become industry standards in tandem.  If the battery to be charged
is in fact lead acid, then "12 V" may in fact be very wrong, and it may
well need something that is actually about 13.8 V for correct operation.
Since there are many power sources that deliver a regulated 12 V output,
specifying 13.8 V may well be necessary to ensure people don't try using
things that won't work.

On the other hand, if the battery to be charged is a NiCd, then things
get even more interesting.  NiCd batteries have a very flat performance
curve, so it's difficult to tell from the voltage whether the battery is
nearly charged, or nearly discharged.  For maximum results, NiCd
batteries should be fully charged just before use, and then used until
they are completely discharged.  If NiCd batteries are repeatedly only
slightly used, then charged right back up again, they develop "memory",
and the voltage drops off and the battery acts "dead" much sooner than
it should.  This is very different from lead acid batteries, which like
to be kept fully charged, but don't like to be repeatedly deeply
discharged.
rcurl
response 6 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 03:34 UTC 1995

1991 ARRL Hndbook: "Most modern radio equipment is powered from 13.8V
...." The Handbook also shows several power supplies and lead-acid battery
chargers that provide 13.8 volts. 

I think I have a hint: apparently, the "float" voltage for the lead-acid
battery is very close to 13.8 volts. That is, at that voltage supplied
from a charger, the "charge" rate becomes very small. Actually, it doesn't
charge, but there is water electrolysis, but at an "acceptable" small
rate.  Therefore a 13.8V power supply is a "standard" charging circuit.
Presumably, then, other battery-pack designers worked to that standard. 
(The water-electrolysis voltage is really closer to 1.5 volts, but the
chemistry of the lead-acid battery supports 0.8 volts of "overvoltage", so
water electrolysis doesn't start until 2.3 volts per cell, or 13.8V for 6
cells). 

rcurl
response 7 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 06:45 UTC 1995

I *have* seen a labeled 13.8V power supply, though not specifically for
charging. The Astron power supplies for ham equipment provides 13.8V
+/- 0.05V. This doesn't get into the historical origin of the choice,
but illustrates the standard.
n8nxf
response 8 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 13:43 UTC 1995

My Heathkit HW4M HT has two plugs too.  However, one is for the battery
charger and the the other, labeled "DC In", supplies power directly to
the HT, bypassing the battery.  Connecting power to this connector does
not charge the battery.  It is intended for mobile operation where it is
connected to the mobile systems power source, most commonly a lead-acid
battery/charging system.  Almost a decade ago, I did some work with UPS
systems for heart-lung machines.  The chargers for the 12 volt lead-acid
batteries would start out charging at a current = 1/10th the amp-hr. rating
of the battery until the voltage across the battery reached 14.2 VDC.  At
that point the voltage went back to 13.8 VDC and held there indefinatly.
This charging procedure resaulted in the quickest charging of the battery
without doing damage to it.  They would have charged just as well had we
simply a charger held at a constant 13.8 VDC with a cow-bar curent limiting
circuit to keep the current from getting too high at the start.  It would
take longer to charge though.  I suspect 13.8 was chosen since an ideal
charging circuit will maintain this voltage on your standard 12 VDC lead acid
battery.  BTW, 10.7 VDC (Under normal operating load.) is considered "deep
discharge" for a deep-discharge lead-acid battery.  Any less and you risk
permanant damage to the battery.  The "discharged" voltage of a regular
battery is somewhat higher.  I'd suspect somewhere between 11.5 and 12.5
VDC.
rcurl
response 9 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 17:04 UTC 1995

My ICOM 2GAT requires a separate adapter for running directly from the car
battery; the battery jacks are just for charging. Now that we realize that
13.8 volts is a (nominal?) standard for the float charging voltage for a
lead-acid battery - it doesn't seem to make much sense to specify
"exactly" that for the charging source for NiCd battery packs, which have
their own current limiting or more sophisticated charging circuits. Or,
does it?


n8nxf
response 10 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 17:55 UTC 1995

The sophisication of most HT chargers consists or a resistor in series
with the battery.  So as not to get into trouble with UL and a host of
other regulation agencise, they prob. have to keep the wall-wart voltage
below 24 VDC.  Being able to charge the battery from a lighter plug is
also nice.  Hence this series charging resistor is not of a high value.
Small changes in charge voltage can mean big changes in charge current
for this reason.  They could put a more tolerant charging ckt. in but
that would take space and people already gripe about having to pay $50+
for a new battery.  (Well, I do!)
rcurl
response 11 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 24 18:07 UTC 1995

The nominal charging current of 10% of the ma-h capacity in ma, is
pretty rough too. Even with just a current limiting resistor, I'd
think there is some tolerance on the charging voltage. So, what would you
say? From the nominal pack voltage up to 20V? (ca. 15%, rather than 10%)
n8nxf
response 12 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 25 13:29 UTC 1995

Using Ohms law, it should be pretty simple to calculate: 
Resister = ((Supply voltage) - (Battery voltage)) / (Desired charge current)
 
Unless it's a battery designed for fast-charge, don't go to far beyound the
10% charging rule.  Doing so WILL reduce the life of the NiCad pack
significantly.  Fast charge NiCad packs and chargers have termal sensors
to sense the temprature of the pack during charging.  They look for a sudden
change in temp. to determin full charge.

Figuring the charging current is simple too:
(Charging current) = ((Supplied voltage) - (Bat. voltage)) / Resistor

How long it takes to charge a battery pack is also important to most users.
I would guess that the charging efficiency is somewhere around 85%.
 
To find out how long it will take to charge the battery pack:
(Time to full charge) = (Amp Hr. capacity of pack) / (Charge current in Amps)
 / (.85)

With that, it sould be possible to design a reasonable charger to suit ones
needs ;-)
rcurl
response 13 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 06:45 UTC 1995

Just after I had hit Return on #11, I realized that I had not considered
the battery voltage"! This will be rather important for my 13.2V HT
battery pack which says charge from 13.8 volts. If it is just a resistor,
going to a 14.4V source would double the charging current. Since you can
get 14.4V while charging a charged lead-acid battery, I wonder if the
battery pack isn't a bit more sophisticated. Perhaps they choose the
resistor to give the maximum charging current with (say) 15V, and include
a 7815 15V reg ($0.67 retail) with the resistor to set the max charging
current at 15V (and it would take longer to charge with 13.8V source).  A
few tests of battery packs with a variable voltage source and ma meter
should tell the tale (but I don't have the former). 

n8nxf
response 14 of 42: Mark Unseen   Jan 26 13:43 UTC 1995

Indeed!  The problem with a 7815 is that a 78XX type regulator requires
about 3V of "headroom" to regulate properly.  i.e. a 7815 would require
a 18V input to regulate to 15V.  There are "low dropout" regulators, but
even these require about a volt of headroom.  When you consider that a
silicone junction requires about 0.7V to overcome, you'll find that 
designing an active regulator is tricky.
One trick would be to have a switching circuit that "breaks" your 13.2V
pack in half, creating two 6.6V packs, and than placing the two halves
in parallel for charging.  If you figure out the switching for this, you'll
see it is not simple and might be prone to problems.  I've done this and,
if memory serves, it required a DPDT switch.
You'd be wecome to run some experiments in my basement some evening Rane.
Mad scinentists have all that kind of stuff ;-)
rcurl
response 15 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 5 20:13 UTC 1995

A battery pack for a 2GAT HT, which I thought I had charged not long
before, went dead after ca. 20 minutes, during the Walkathon, so I looked
into it further. It is a pack that holds 8 replaceable AA NiCads, and
hence has a nominal voltage of 9.6. I charged it fully and then discharged
it rather completely through 100 ohms; it went dead within an hour. I then
repeated the charge/discharge, as a "conditioning" exercise. After
recharging again, I decided to have a look at the discharge curve, so
recorded the pack voltage every half-hour while discharging through 100
ohms. The discharge curve looked like (t in hours, V in volts): 

t   0     0.5   1.0   1.5   2.0  3.0  3.5  4.0  4.5  5.0  5.5  6.0  6.5  6.75
V  11.22 10.46 10.14 10.04 10.02 9.96 9.92 9.85 9.75 9.64 9.48 9.21 7.27 5.34 

The area under V vs t, divided by R, is the A-H capacity, which for this
discharge is 0.646 A-H, very close to the nominal 0.6 A-H. Therefore, all
the cells took a full charge. This appears to be a way to test a NiCad
battery park, even though it is somewhat tedious to read the voltage at
intervals for nearly 7 hours (hmmm...a computer could do that, including
terminating the discharge at a desired voltage. Anyone know of a circuit
for building such?)

The charging current initially was 65 ma (ca. 0.1C), while at full charge
it was 45 ma., from a 14+ VDC source. The back resistance on the + side
was "infinite", and the forward resistance with an ohmeter was 150K, which
means there is at least a diode and apparently a current-limiting circuit,
and not just a resistor. 

I thought this was an interesting exercise. I'm going to try it next
on the regular BP-70 pack for the 2GAT.

gregc
response 16 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 6 15:42 UTC 1995

I've never tried this exercise. It seems well done, but I'm perplexed by
the numbers you got. A nicad cell is rated at 1.2 volts. 8 cells should yield
9.6 volts. Yet your pack put out over 9.6 volts for 5(!) hours. This just
doesn't seem right.

You initially said that the pack went "dead" after a 1 hour discharge through
a 100 ohm resistor. What voltage level do you associate with "dead"?

After recharging, it was able to deliver charge for 7 hours? That's a
rather miraculous recovery. Is it possible you have a loose connection in
your charger that resulted in incomplete charges the first couple of times?
Since you were now in the process of actively "fiddling" with the whole
setup, you could have wiggled whatever was loose in the charger back into
a temporary working condition. Just an idea.

I just checked the 2 battery packs for my Makita drill. The fully charged
one, charged about 3 weeks ago, was at 10.30volts. The partially discharged
pack in the drill was at 10.1volts. I ran that pack down  to the point where
it could no longer turn the drill and then left it loaded for an additional
2 minutes. Immediately upon removal from the drill it was at 2.2 volts but
it was climbing back up. After 10 minutes it had "recovered" to 8.85volts
and was stable at that voltage. Interestingly, even though this cell was
"dead", it put out 8.85 volts at high impedence *and* into a 100ohm load.

After fully charging it, the pack was at 11.45volts. This dropped off after
a couple of hours to a level of 10.95volts.

Hmmm, so much for that 1.2volts per cell.

I think one thing to remember here is that a rechargable battery(lead-acid,
gel-cel, nicad, whatever) is always "high" when it first comes off the
charger. Close to it's charging voltage. But pretty quickly stabilizes
at it's normal voltage. How long after coming off the charger did you run
your discharge test Rane? Another idea is to try the same sequence with
no load and see what the battery's output curve is like.

ajax
response 17 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 6 15:47 UTC 1995

  (And this from the guy who said counting people at the Ypsi post
office was a dubious expenditure of time?  ;-)
 
  Btw, what do folks think of the new "rechargable alkaline" batteries?
I've heard they have shorter lives overall, but longer per-charge use.
I'm thinking of phasing out most of my NiCads in favor of alkalines,
to avoid the inconvenience of 10 minute battery charges.
gregc
response 18 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 6 16:33 UTC 1995

Depends on what you are using them in. The alkalines would probably work
fine in a low current device, but I suspect they wouldn't work as well
in a battery-powered power tool. Nicads are kind of halfway between being
a battery and a capacitor. You can pull a great deal more current off
of a nicad per unit time, than you can from a regular battery. In effect,
you're sucking electrons directly off of a charged plate, rather than
waiting for the comparitively slower effects of a chemical reaction
to proceed. This comes in handy in power tools that need to deliver high
torque into high loads.
rcurl
response 19 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 6 20:01 UTC 1995

Re #17: I have practical use for batteries and their behavior. The safety
of people at the Walkathon could have depended upon my battery status
(though it was the supply of oranges that really did). I have absolutely
no practical use for counts of the traffic at Ypsi post office. You must,
since you comment on this. What is it? 

I have repeated my experiment with the BP-70 battery pack for a 2GAT,
which has a nominal voltage of 13.2, and capacity of 0.27 A-H. The
discharge curve with a 149 ohm load was: 

t(min)     0   20   40   60   80  100  120  140  160  180  200  220 227     
V(volts) 15.0 14.0 13.6 13.4 13.3 13.2 13.1 13.0 12.8 12.3 11.3 7.7 6.0

Integrating the curve, as before, gives a capacity of 0.32 A-H. Another
"OK" battery pack. 

These discharge curves resemble those for AA NiCads shown in the Radio
Shack Battery Guidebook - an initial sharp drop (after charging), followed
by a slow drop until "capacity" is reached (though as shown in the
Guidebook, "capacity" depends on the discharge rate). 

I started these experiments immediately after charging. Higher than
nominal voltage arises from the electrolyte composition between the plates
not being uniform due to the internal flux of ions during charging. In
principle, if I had waited after charging (long enough) nominal voltage
would be attained. The same occurs during discharge: ionic species are
consumed or produced at the electrodes, but do not diffuse rapidly enough
to be uniform in composition everywhere. Battery voltage depends upon the
electrolyte composition at the electrodes (as well as gradients in this
within the bulk electrolyte), so the voltage has some dependence on
charge/discharge history. (The phenomenon of a non-uniform distribution of
electrolyte composition is called "polarization".)

The observation that the 9.6 V (nominal) pack "went dead within an hour"
may have been due to my not charging it long enough - my experiment was
initially not as controlled as would be desirable! I was going to consider
"dead" as 1 volt/cell (the books say to discharge only to this level), but
I ran the pack down to ca. 3 volts. 

After discharge of the pack with separate AA cells, I measured each cell
with a RS "battery tester". One tested OK, 2 tested "so-so", four tested
"low", and 1 tested "dead" (these are as shown by the red and green LEDs).
This is not surprising as the cells cannot have *identical* capacities,
and the final discharge cut-off is very steep. 

Re NiCads vs rechargable alkalines: the suggested load current range for a
AA NiCad is 0 to 2.0 amperes, and for an (ordinary) alkaline is 0 to 0.25
amperes (and for a carbon-zinc AA, 0 to 25 milliamps!). I don't have the
value for a rechargable alkaline, but I think it is the same as for an
ordinary alkaline, the difference being only that it can be "recharged".
(They cannot, in actually, be "recharged", but only depolarized, which
appears to extend their lives, since even ordinary alkalines have *much*
more zinc in them than is used.)

The discharge from NiCads comes only from the chemical reaction at the
electrodes - not any capacitive effect. However the NiCad has a great deal
more electrode area: they are built with strips of Cd and Ni (converted to
Nickelic hydroxide) separated by a thin layer of electrolyte, and rolled
into a cylinder. This construction is like an electrolytic apacitor, which
is what I think Grex was referring to. 

Incidentally, my experience has been that it is best to use NiCads until
they are nearly fully discharged, and then recharge, rather than leaving
them to float on charge. This, unfortunately, is not the best mode of
operation of insuring an always-ready, fully-charged battery. In some
applications, one can do a "deep discharge" at intervals, and recover
NiCad capacity. I have a utility for controlled deep discharge of a Mac
Powerbook battery, but have not seen the equivalent for general use of
NiCads. 

scg
response 20 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 7 04:21 UTC 1995

re 17:
        I tried using a Rayoovac Renewal battery (rechargable alkaline) AA
battery in my pager, and it died after two days and two pages.  I decided
that, even though it might be cheaper just to have a few Renewals and
rotate them, rather than using non rechargable alkaline batteries, it
really wasn't worth the hassle of having to change the battery that often.
 I went back to nonrechargable alkaline batteries, which tend to last two
or three weeks.
rcurl
response 21 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 7 07:58 UTC 1995

In #19 I called Greg "Grex" - a Freudian slip.
gregc
response 22 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 7 16:52 UTC 1995

Heh, yes, I was going to mention that.

Yes, I was thinking of nicads being similiar to electrolytics in their
construction and their ability to shed a charge at a much higher rate
than a normal, one-shot, chemical battery.

Your observation about nicads jibes with most recomendations for thier
use. I nicad should be used to complete discharge before it is put back
in the charger. As opposed to constant topping-off. They are meant to be
"deep cycled". Thhis is the opposite of a car battery, which should always
be kept at top-charge and never deep cycled.

Er, change "I nicad" to "A nicad" above.

_I Nicad_? Wasn't that the Asimov book about the little battery that could? :-)
ajax
response 23 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 7 16:59 UTC 1995

  Re #19, just kidding Rane...I thought you were doing this just out of
curiosity, which is the reason I'd watch a PO; didn't realize it's a
serious safety-related endeavor!
 
  I've heard of the full-discharging devices for powerbook batteries...I
wonder why they aren't used in regular NiCad chargers.  It seems like a
lot of my battery-consuming devices become unusuable prior to the batteries
being completely drained.  Should I hook up a resistor or something to
drain them more completely?
 
  Most of my uses are occasional...an electronic scale, flashlights, a smoke
detector, a mini tape recorder, that sort of stuff.  It *seems* like my
NiCads just wear out too quickly on those things.  Any battery advice for
those sorts of things?
 
  I use alkalines in my pager too, and get about 2-3 weeks out of them.
I start losing bits of pages a few days before my low battery indicator
goes off, at which point I'm losing big chunks of pages.  (An alpha-pager,
so it's not as critical as with a numeric).
gregc
response 24 of 42: Mark Unseen   May 7 17:24 UTC 1995

Hmmm, that's interesting. My alpha pager continues to recieve
good pages *long* after the low-battery indicator has gone off.
In fact, almost dead batteries affect the display quality alot more than
they affect message content. I almost never lose characters with dead
batteries. Until, of course, it just stops working entirely.

I'm using a motorola advisor, what is your's?
 0-24   25-42         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss