|
Grex > Enigma > #393: Whatever Happened to Nick Pruswagio? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
remmers
|
|
Whatever Happened to Nick Pruswagio?
| 
Aug 26 16:31 UTC 2007 |
Whatever happened to Nick Pruswagio? Is there no end to the swirl of
rumors that encompass and refine the mortal debate that ensues regarding
the morass of obfuscation that both delimits and expands the
controversial engines of doubt and fear mongering that surround the
oft-treacherous revisory capitulation to greed and botanical
revisionism? Sometimes I despair.
|
| 6 responses total. |
cmcgee
|
|
response 1 of 6:
|
Aug 27 15:36 UTC 2007 |
Have you thoroughly read the Wikipedia article? That may help you deal
with the existential dilemma you have created.
|
remmers
|
|
response 2 of 6:
|
Aug 28 11:33 UTC 2007 |
The author of the Wikipedia article is a scoundrel, with vested
interests left undisclosed.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 3 of 6:
|
Aug 28 20:48 UTC 2007 |
Are they greedy and botanical?
Perhaps if we focus on the moral debate we can fill the whole garden
with FUD. I'm afraid the mortal debate is moot. You know, ...........
and then you die.
|
remmers
|
|
response 4 of 6:
|
Aug 31 21:34 UTC 2007 |
I may have a line on Nick Pruswagio's whereabouts. Stay tuned.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 5 of 6:
|
Aug 31 22:00 UTC 2007 |
adjusts the little tuner along the copper wires wrapped around the
toilet paper roll.
|
remmers
|
|
response 6 of 6:
|
Oct 5 13:41 UTC 2007 |
Nick Pruswagio, having leapt the boundary between clarity and doubt, is
now ensconced in a profitable middle ground, reaping the benefits of his
escalatory strategy and fastidious tactics. The world awaits the
cornucopia of treasures that will accrue from this fortuitous
happenstance. If there is a downside, it is of no concern to anyone
except perhaps to those benighted souls who wallow in doubt and
self-effacement. May art, science, and commerce benefit from the
fulsome inundation of Nick Pruswagio's serendipitous and deliciously
inventive manifestation.
|