You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100      
 
Author Message
mary
07:19:40 Mark Unseen   Nov 26 12:19 UTC 2002

When you go to Borders all of the books have the same
words.  Oh, maybe a very few have unique words in them,
but most are the same words over and over.  All that
varies is the order of the words.  What a rip.

And another thing...  Every year we celebrate our birthday,
anniversaries, and other special personal days.  But we
don't even give it a thought that once a year we experience
the anniversary of our own death.  It just flows by.

100 responses total.
remmers
response 1 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 13:03 UTC 2002

I have to agree -- most books are just recycled language.  Same old
words that were used in hundreds and hundreds of books before.  And
they expect you to pay money for this unoriginal crap.  Can't they
at least be froblequantzenhutz?

As to the second point -- yeah, people should give more thought to
that.  The next time you feel like celebrating and can't figure out
the reason, now you know.
scott
response 2 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 14:16 UTC 2002

This is a nicely cromulent item, mary.  
mary
response 3 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 15:28 UTC 2002

(mary rushes to her Dictionary, pages fly, then
 she whops herself upside the head.)

chege
response 4 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 15:54 UTC 2002

Hi mary
chege
response 5 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 15:54 UTC 2002

HI
other
response 6 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 17:42 UTC 2002

Biddlefranzen in the muddlengt.  Wazanfround!
jazz
response 7 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 18:00 UTC 2002

        Great big bolshy yarblockos to that.
slynne
response 8 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 19:26 UTC 2002

Mary, are you smoking pot again? ha ha
heyguy
response 9 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 20:39 UTC 2002

Not me! I like to say things in my own words! Flik flok flarnik flongo flooo!
(As George Carlin said.)
russ
response 10 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 22:43 UTC 2002

I bet Mary was smirking the whole time she was thinking about this.
mary
response 11 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 26 23:49 UTC 2002

Glow in the dark lipstick.

Think about it.
slynne
response 12 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 00:03 UTC 2002

I would rather ponder pop rocks. 
other
response 13 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 01:26 UTC 2002

Glow in the dark lipstick would be complemented greatly by glow in the 
dark condoms...
jazz
response 14 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 14:33 UTC 2002

        Glow in the dark rings would also compliment that quite nicely.
mynxcat
response 15 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 15:15 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 16 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 16:37 UTC 2002

Glow in the dark paint is a great thing.  My friends and I painted models
with it when I was a kid.  And once we painted a model rocket with it and
set it off at night.
jazz
response 17 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 16:42 UTC 2002

        I was thinking more nipple rings, but YMMV.
mynxcat
response 18 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 16:46 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

anderyn
response 19 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 17:07 UTC 2002

?????
other
response 20 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 18:39 UTC 2002

<falls down laughing>

Twila, you're priceless!
remmers
response 21 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 18:48 UTC 2002

In regards to the original topic of this item:  The business world
does regularly contribute new words to the language, in the form
of product names.  So I think that if books used lots and lots
of product names, especially of newer products, that would go a
long way towards alleviating the problem of just reusing the same
words over and over.  As an added incentive, product manufacturers
might be willing to subsidize the practice if their own products
get sufficient mention.  This would benefit both business and
the consumer.

A reasonable "product name density" might be, say, 10%.  Assuming
that a book has about 400 words per page, this comes out to around 40
product mentions per page.  I urge publishers to adopt this practice
on all of their new books.  They should revise all older books as
well to incorporate the aforementioned 10% product name density.
other
response 22 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 19:06 UTC 2002

bleah!
remmers
response 23 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 13:50 UTC 2002

Hmph.  Your outright rejection of my constructive idea has given me
an intense headache.  Excuse me while I got take a Tylenol.

Oh by the way, I hope you OD on Pepto-Bismol.
mxyzptlk
response 24 of 100: Mark Unseen   Nov 28 14:26 UTC 2002

the best...  steal
the good...  borrow
the crap...  recycle
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss