You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-23          
 
Author Message
remmers
This Item Mark Unseen   Mar 7 12:06 UTC 1998

        This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
        other items.

23 responses total.
orinoco
response 1 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:51 UTC 1998

Item 330: This Item
Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


        This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
        other items.


orinoco
response 2 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:52 UTC 1998

Item 330: This Item
Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


        This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
        other items.


1 response total.


#1 of 1: by the Department for the Study of Infinite Regress (orinoco) on Sat,
M
ar  7, 1998 (18:51):
 Item 330: This Item
 Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


         This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
         other items.



orinoco
response 3 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:54 UTC 1998

Item 330: This Item
Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


        This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
        other items.


2 responses total.


#1 of 2: by the Department for the Study of Infinite Regress (orinoco) on Sat,
M
ar  7, 1998 (18:51):
 Item 330: This Item
 Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


         This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
         other items.


#2 of 2: by the Department for the Study of the Department for the Study of
Infi
nite Regress (orinoco) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (18:52):

 Item 330: This Item
 Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


         This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
         other items.


 1 response total.


 #1 of 1: by the Department for the Study of Infinite Regress (orinoco) on
Sat,
 M
 ar  7, 1998 (18:51):
  Item 330: This Item
  Entered by Co-op Snord (remmers) on Sat, Mar  7, 1998 (07:06):


          This item is for things that don't belong in any of the
          other items.



orinoco
response 4 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 23:56 UTC 1998

Thank you for your time.
i
response 5 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 00:19 UTC 1998

You're welcome.  My pleasure.
lee
response 6 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 22:53 UTC 1998

What was this item about again?
remmers
response 7 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 10:57 UTC 1998

I can't tell you in this item.
lee
response 8 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 22:55 UTC 1998

Then tell me in the next item.
orinoco
response 9 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 03:07 UTC 1998

<dan falls off the edge of the earth>
lee
response 10 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 13 23:58 UTC 1998

I thought they said it was round
not flat
orinoco
response 11 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 17:05 UTC 1998

Round things have edges too.  You just have to jump high enough to reach
escape velocity.  It's a very high-speed fall.
i
response 12 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 03:01 UTC 1998

Nonsense!  It's easier to fall off round things than flat.  Try standing
on a Frisbee sitting on the sidewalk.  Easy, right?  Now try it with a
well-inflated basketball.
orinoco
response 13 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 19:58 UTC 1998

Are you calling teh world a frisbee?  The Fnaphettes will be pleased
i
response 14 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 22:56 UTC 1998

No, no, no.  Frisbees spin like old records being played.  The world 
spins on the other axis - like a coin being flipped.  

Cripes, do they even *have* science classes in the schools anymore?
orinoco
response 15 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 02:22 UTC 1998

(Do you ever have just one cripe, wandering aimlessly without companionship?)

(Isn't it just heartbreaking?)

lee
response 16 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 23:54 UTC 1998

No but I've had crepes.  They go good in pairs too.
orinoco
response 17 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 03:23 UTC 1998

How about creeps?  We seem to have our share of those...
remmers
response 18 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 12:25 UTC 1998

Do they come in pairs?
snowth
response 19 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 02:17 UTC 1998

No, but you can buy the family pack with a set of three.
lee
response 20 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 20 23:08 UTC 1998

Only three?  My family has six people.
snowth
response 21 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 21 03:24 UTC 1998

yes, but most serving sizes don't reflect how much people actually eat,
either. Why should the family pack match the number in your family?
orinoco
response 22 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 23 03:28 UTC 1998

_what_ is your family doing with those creeps?  Sounds vaguely creepy to me...
okuma
response 23 of 23: Mark Unseen   Mar 27 05:17 UTC 1998

Re: 20  Trick is put three of your six family members in cryogenic
suspension therefore leaving three to enjoy the family pack.  Buying two packs
of three is much too easy.
 0-23          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss