|
|
| Author |
Message |
remmers
|
|
Boolah boolah boolah
| 
Oct 9 00:15 UTC 1997 |
Boolah boolah boolah,
I wanna do the hula,
I'll do it after schoola,
Boolah boolah boolah.
Hubba hubba hubba,
I wanna backa rubba,
Maybe I'll ask Bubba,
Hubba hubba hubba.
Swishy swishy swishy,
Soapy water for the dishy,
So it won't smell fishy,
Swishy swishy swishy.
|
| 50 responses total. |
i
|
|
response 1 of 50:
|
Oct 12 22:59 UTC 1997 |
Is "Respond, pass, forget, quit, or ? for more options?" a rhetorical
question? Or not?
|
lee
|
|
response 2 of 50:
|
Oct 13 02:31 UTC 1997 |
No it isn't because you have to answer it before you can move onto the next
item.
|
janc
|
|
response 3 of 50:
|
Oct 13 19:48 UTC 1997 |
I don't think it's a question at all.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 4 of 50:
|
Oct 13 22:13 UTC 1997 |
That implies that you'd want to move on, lee. If you're happy where you are,
you don't have to say anything.
|
remmers
|
|
response 5 of 50:
|
Oct 14 02:03 UTC 1997 |
Yuck yuck. Gorsh, I'm happy right here in this item.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 6 of 50:
|
Oct 14 21:29 UTC 1997 |
I'm glad you're happy.
|
i
|
|
response 7 of 50:
|
Oct 15 00:53 UTC 1997 |
Methinks that our fair Snord has had a few too many Ho-Ho's...
|
snowth
|
|
response 8 of 50:
|
Oct 15 01:18 UTC 1997 |
Hey orin, I'm happy you're glad.
|
lee
|
|
response 9 of 50:
|
Oct 16 03:09 UTC 1997 |
This is beginning to sound like the happy item in agora.
|
janc
|
|
response 10 of 50:
|
Oct 17 15:58 UTC 1997 |
Did Mortimer secretly lust after Candice? What was the relationship between
Charle and Joe McCarthy? Inquiring minds want to know.
|
i
|
|
response 11 of 50:
|
Oct 18 18:55 UTC 1997 |
Mortimer secretly lusted after the Cantor Set. Frustrated, he consoled
himself on a few too many Ho-Hos. Eyes spiraling inward between light and
darkness bite after bite, he got dizzy and passed out. Eventually, he
woke up here. Almost as bad as being a camel wash attendant in ancient
Egypt.
|
lee
|
|
response 12 of 50:
|
Oct 19 02:53 UTC 1997 |
those ho-ho's just don't go away...
|
orinoco
|
|
response 13 of 50:
|
Oct 19 20:13 UTC 1997 |
Yeah. That's why it's a bad job. Getting 'em out of the camel fur is murder.
|
lee
|
|
response 14 of 50:
|
Oct 24 04:43 UTC 1997 |
furry creatures roamed the earth
|
i
|
|
response 15 of 50:
|
Oct 25 13:08 UTC 1997 |
in ages past. Now Ho-Ho's are slowly driving them to extinction.
|
lee
|
|
response 16 of 50:
|
Oct 26 02:37 UTC 1997 |
Will Ho-Ho's ever become extinct?
|
i
|
|
response 17 of 50:
|
Oct 26 13:11 UTC 1997 |
We're all praying, but God doesn't seem very merciful on that issue...
|
orinoco
|
|
response 18 of 50:
|
Oct 26 16:27 UTC 1997 |
Ho-Ho's are a tool of Satan. They are out of God's domain entirely.
I mean, what omnipotent being is going to have fake snack food sitting around
his house?
|
remmers
|
|
response 19 of 50:
|
Oct 28 15:41 UTC 1997 |
Well, me, for one.
|
lee
|
|
response 20 of 50:
|
Oct 29 00:01 UTC 1997 |
depends on how you define fake snack food... is it imaginary?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 21 of 50:
|
Oct 29 00:03 UTC 1997 |
Omnipotent beings can't say 'gorsh', remmers. It's strictly forbidden.
Divine mistique and all. So sorry.
|
i
|
|
response 22 of 50:
|
Oct 29 02:18 UTC 1997 |
But being omnipotent, omnipresent, omnivorous, omniscient, omnidirectional,
omnifistulous, etc., He can direct some underflunky to make mortals *think*
that He said 'gorsh' to test the Faith of His followers.
|
remmers
|
|
response 23 of 50:
|
Oct 29 04:02 UTC 1997 |
Well gorsh, I am deeply moved.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 24 of 50:
|
Oct 30 00:23 UTC 1997 |
What about omnisporkulous? That would be the true test of his divinity.
|