|
|
| Author |
Message |
matts
|
|
Cybersexx.......
| 
Jun 23 19:04 UTC 1994 |
With all the hype lately about cybersex, i would just like to clear one
thing up........
all it is is hightech masterbation...that's all!
it is completely overrated, and many people think that it allready exsists
in fact, it does not.
In theory, this is what "cybersexx" is. One would put on a suit that
would more than snuggly fit certain...ah..phisical attributes with a
sensual taughtness. One would wear the typical stereoscopic glasses,
and have sensors on there hands, legs, and um...well, you know...
|
| 42 responses total. |
dang
|
|
response 1 of 42:
|
Jun 24 17:47 UTC 1994 |
however, it isn't quite masturbation, but more like screwing a fantasy
created by the computer. and one with rather bad graphics.
|
matts
|
|
response 2 of 42:
|
Jun 24 18:59 UTC 1994 |
gives new meaning to a 5 1/4 inch floppy, doesn't it?
|
alfer
|
|
response 3 of 42:
|
Sep 8 00:54 UTC 1994 |
If this is what you need, then go for it!
|
requiem
|
|
response 4 of 42:
|
Oct 3 11:36 UTC 1994 |
Sorry but I always thought cyber sex (in the media sense) to mean
getting together with a partner via a talker/mud/irc and having
sex together via emotes and talks. This kind of fantasy is not
so hard to come by as opposed to this virtual-stimulation suit thing
and the two-way aspect makes it much more interesting...
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 5 of 42:
|
Oct 11 19:29 UTC 1994 |
Didn't i see Virtual Vicki around here a few minutes ago?
|
madmax
|
|
response 6 of 42:
|
Oct 21 20:35 UTC 1994 |
What is Virtual Vicki? I have heard the name elsewhere.
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 7 of 42:
|
Oct 27 17:16 UTC 1994 |
VVick is the name for a virtual prostitution BBS as mentioned in the game
Cyberpunk 2020 from R. Talsorian games. (I wonder if it's possible to start one
up here? On the sexuality board mebbe?)
|
jimmyg
|
|
response 8 of 42:
|
Nov 2 20:08 UTC 1994 |
You people are all pretty confused if you think that it is only a masterbation
session. This is a way for some of the societal outcasts to communicate"."" ."
|
selena
|
|
response 9 of 42:
|
Nov 8 16:34 UTC 1994 |
While I'm uncertain about the communication part, I have this to say
for cybersex (as defined by two or more people ntalking or party-ing together
lewdly): it is THE safest way to experiment with and discover all the differ-
ent aspects of sexuality. No chance of getting imprgnated (or impregnating
someone), no STD transmission is possible (but having a good antivirus on your
terminal never hurts), and it relieves much sexual tension, without the need
for potentially harmful (physical) side-effects. Or, to put it concisely, I'm
all for it!
|
peacefrg
|
|
response 10 of 42:
|
Nov 10 18:28 UTC 1994 |
To me the whole concept is kind of scary. At least on 900 lines people
can hear a voice and get a pretty good idea what sex they're talking
to. But on a computer you have no idea who you are talking to. Anybody
can join under a differant name or sex.
|
raven
|
|
response 11 of 42:
|
Nov 10 22:54 UTC 1994 |
Re # 10, it seems gender bending might be one of the posative
aspects of "cybersex."
|
slug
|
|
response 12 of 42:
|
Nov 16 12:38 UTC 1994 |
hello i'm from planet zarg
when i loogged on it asked me Male or Female
I'm a zelob, what do I do ?
|
mitzvah5
|
|
response 13 of 42:
|
Nov 18 23:51 UTC 1994 |
It IS ( cybersex ), unfortunately, just a lots of hype stil today, though
a healthy alternative for squeezing pimples. Computerized stimulation for
masturbation and on it self certainly NOT relieving, but creating tension.
In Europe it's a subject of laugh and so are the now-existing interactive
CD-roms ( the ones about sex, Virtual Valery etc ).
But there is a great (near)future waiting....
I'm disappointed every time I read about somebody who's prefering paper-
or electric dreams instead of the real thing; the disease thing sounds like
an excuse. What are you afraid of ?
|
raven
|
|
response 14 of 42:
|
Nov 19 00:26 UTC 1994 |
Come on people this the lamest topic here. Branch out from this
already dead subject. Cyber culture anyone? Your rights in cyberspace?
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 15 of 42:
|
Nov 19 19:42 UTC 1994 |
I've noticed that a lot of the major carriers get peeved when you talk about
problems such as rate hikes, Net rights, etc. There was this story in
Newsweek last year, and in it they mentioned that there was a rate hike over
on Prodigy, and when several of the users posted messages to advertisers
complaining about it, they were kicked off the network.
Comments?
|
mitzvah5
|
|
response 16 of 42:
|
Nov 20 21:40 UTC 1994 |
Sure, but first after I'd talked with just single one, who really have been
kicked off because of that. There was a discussion on the Well about policy
trashes and so far I can recall it aproved, that most of this stories were just
kind of modern myths and that most of tthe folks, who were thrown out, had an
complettely other reason for to bbe excluded...But, if it's a paynet it may
sound better to "be kicked off because of critical stand" than because of
missing pay for the couple of last months... By the way, can someone tell for a
newbie, wich command brings up info-page of those, who agree that it's ok for
others to read it ? Like "bio username" command on the Well ? And email adress
to GREX support ? Thnx !
|
raven
|
|
response 17 of 42:
|
Nov 21 07:06 UTC 1994 |
r # 16 try !finger xxxxxx to get "bio" info. It's a standard Unix
command that you should have on the Well that also runs Pico as it's conf
application.
|
buk
|
|
response 18 of 42:
|
Nov 21 16:27 UTC 1994 |
Mausturbation as Woody Allen once said is having sex with someone you love
ie. yourself. Cybersex is nothing more than a device to put geeky, socially
inadaquate net users further away from real life. Sure it would be fun to have
an accomadating whore in your home and office in the shape of a pc computer,
but hey people gat a life. Of course it raises a number of thorny questions..
is adultry possible on the net? etc. goodbye, live long and prosper. may your
genitals never meet with a catus and your oricices never be invaded by a an oak
tree
|
doorknob
|
|
response 19 of 42:
|
Nov 21 18:21 UTC 1994 |
Amen
|
buk
|
|
response 20 of 42:
|
Nov 21 19:10 UTC 1994 |
Remember Neil that it can make you go blind! so
rightly you religiously rejoice in the fullness
of your health and the ability to see wnere your plaything is.
one other thing....Dont dogs have a great life.All they do
is sit around and have cybersex all day.
Thanking you, god, my mother and the little bits
of crud that are in everyones plug hole.
|
srw
|
|
response 21 of 42:
|
Nov 22 08:04 UTC 1994 |
For Grex support of an informational nature, it is best to first join and
scan the "info" conference, the purpose of which is to provide information
about how to use Grex. You can post questions there if you don't see the
answer already given.
For more active help, as in getting something changed for you, write
email to staff@cyberspace.org. You can get answers there, too, but the
info conference is a better choice, as many more people will see your question.
|
peacefrg
|
|
response 22 of 42:
|
Nov 23 04:45 UTC 1994 |
|
wy
|
|
response 23 of 42:
|
Dec 23 08:04 UTC 1994 |
This cybersex thing is twisted. I expect most people, except perverts,
will NOT find what they're looking for from a computer that I doubt will
be capable of simulating anything remotly similar to any sexual experiance for
eons. (Excuse the wordy sentence) I say this topic is pretty well toast.
Has anyone though what the effect of cyberspace will have on the
degradation of morality in general? Killing won't be much fun anymore,
and it's a virtual hacker's playground, if you will excuse the pun. I can
see people like me choosing VR as the reality of choice in the future.
That scares me, 'cause I'm pretty emersed in the net right now....
(Currently in Mosaic, FTPing, and here as well.... for hours...)
|
selena
|
|
response 24 of 42:
|
Dec 28 18:50 UTC 1994 |
By the vehemence of the responses, here, I can see that c-sex,
like ANY other form of sex, is good for some, and not for others. If you
want to parade around, saying that it's unhealthy, though.. that's another
matter!
Masturbation is *not* unhealthy. This has been shown time and again by
psychological studies. Why should masturbating, with computer-provided stimuli,
be considered any less healthy? And if you care to argue the health of "normal"
masturbation, then *I* won't even try to talk with you on this subject!
Go study Human Sexuality, and *then* come back, and make an *informed*
statement.
|