|
Grex > Coop8 > #32: The Grex's Landlords item | |
|
| Author |
Message |
popcorn
|
|
The Grex's Landlords item
|
Mar 4 13:29 UTC 1996 |
I'm not completely caught up after an absence from the co-op conference,
but this doesn't seem to be mentioned elsewhere here....
Grex is having landlord problems again. Grex has two landlords, one of whom
lives in another apartment in the building where Grex lives. In the past,
we have had trouble with other tenants in the building turning off various
circuit breakers, including Grex's circuit breaker, either out of confusion
about how circuit breakers work, or out of maliciousness; we aren't sure
which. We bought a lock for the circuit breaker, so that the breaker can
still trip if a power overload occurs, but a human being can't turn off power
without using a screwdriver to remove the lock. This landlord has both
removed the lock, and several times has turned off the power to either Grex
or to the whole building. This, of course, causes Grex to crash and reboot,
and it can lose people's files. One of the times that this landlord turned
off power to Grex, a staffer was right there and confronted her about it.
She smelled of alcohol and was verbally abusive toward this staffer (STeve).
She asserted that it is *her* house and so she has a right to flip power on
and off whenever she likes.
There were several incidents in a row like this. Grex staffers called the
police, who took a report on it. The board held an emergency meeting (I
wasn't there, but read about it in e-mail) to discuss the problem. They
contacted a lawyer who has knowledge about computers and about landlord/
tenant interactions. He wrote a letter to the landlords, explaining which
laws they had violated, what the penalties are, that we would not like to
have to take legal action against them, and to please stop turning off Grex's
power.
|
| 269 responses total. |
steve
|
|
response 1 of 269:
|
Mar 4 15:09 UTC 1996 |
That letter was dated March 1st. It should arrive via the mail
today. I was the person who called the police.
I hope that this letter will end the problems. ;-)
|
ajax
|
|
response 2 of 269:
|
Mar 4 16:54 UTC 1996 |
(Grex's staff strongly suspects the landlord removed the locks on the
circuit breaker; it wasn't proven or admitted to, last I heard.)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 3 of 269:
|
Mar 4 17:16 UTC 1996 |
I'm glad to see the police were called. I believe that informal warning
had been given that that is what we'd have to do if vandalism occurred
again.
|
jared
|
|
response 4 of 269:
|
Mar 4 18:00 UTC 1996 |
Friendly reminder for STeve to mail someone.. :-)
|
kaplan
|
|
response 5 of 269:
|
Mar 4 18:12 UTC 1996 |
What is it likely to cost to get the space and facilities that grex needs in
a commercial rather than residential location?
|
steve
|
|
response 6 of 269:
|
Mar 5 01:43 UTC 1996 |
A good commercial price is at least $60; I saw several spaces
that looked worse for $90 - $100.
She took the breaker lock the second time--I saw it there one
minute, and wasn't there about 10 minutes later with her still
in the basement.
|
adbarr
|
|
response 7 of 269:
|
Mar 5 04:07 UTC 1996 |
A move is in order.
|
kaplan
|
|
response 8 of 269:
|
Mar 5 05:24 UTC 1996 |
What kind of deal does m-net have for their space? Can we get one like it?
Can we convince m-net to share it with us? If we were sharing space, I hope
the grex and m-net staffs would be able to trust eachother with access to
eachother's hardware.
|
srw
|
|
response 9 of 269:
|
Mar 5 07:16 UTC 1996 |
I don't think Grex is eligible to move into New Center without a 501(C)(3)
Last I heard, the New Center was not interested in having a second system in
their site. If Grex is going to move it will cost us a lot. It is also going
to be very hard to pull off.
Let's not go off half-cocked.
It's very important for us to get the principals in this dispute to understand
what their legal requirements are. We sincerely hope that our letter will do
that. The statements in #0 give the false impression that we are not on good
terms with our landlord. They have problems among themselves that they have
to work out. They may succeed, and we could be fine.
I'm not convinced this item is giving a fair represntation of our situation
at all. It involves a dispute between Grex and others, and I have reservations
about discussing it openly here.
|
mdw
|
|
response 10 of 269:
|
Mar 5 09:58 UTC 1996 |
I don't think sharing space with m-net is a viable possibility at this
point anyways. Some of the same m-net principals who were involved with
"queering" the WIN proposal are still involved with m-net, and given
some of the things those principals said publically at the time, as well
as the actions they took, I think we would have a lot of trouble
trusting them. It's just as well anyways, though--I don't think there's
any real benefit to our sharing space with them, either for m-net, or
for grex.
The situation we're in now, in the dungeon, is still a heck of a lot
better than the situation we were in at the last place. We do actually
have 24 hr access, a lease, affordable price, &etc.--in many ways, it's
still a deal that can't be beat.
Even so -- if it were me, a private individual, renting from them, I'd
be planning not to rewnew, & be looking elsewhere. Life is too short to
waste it dealing with people who don't want you there. Still, it hasn't
been too bad for me yet, and as long as other staffers are willing to
deal with it, I don't have any huge complaint. Certainly, the location
can't be beat. I can actually contemplate dashing over from work,
without my coat, even when it's kind of miserable out, because it's so
close. I doubt Grex will ever again be anywhere nearly that convenient
to me.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 11 of 269:
|
Mar 5 10:35 UTC 1996 |
Re 9: I apologize for posting this item without first running the text of it
past the board. I do feel it's important to keep the users informed about
things that affect the system in such a large way, and I view this item as
a continuation of the "landlord stuff" item in the coop7 conference.
If I've misstated anything, please do feel free to clarify things.
|
adbarr
|
|
response 12 of 269:
|
Mar 5 12:11 UTC 1996 |
Is it too much trouble to look for another location, without making any
commitments, of course, while you are trying to educate the landlord persons
to act like responsible adults? I think Grex needs a psychologist, at least,
to negotiate the deal with the present landlords. There is ample evidence that
the "law" is not being respected here. Why will this get better? Your
experience may be different than mine but my experience says there will be
worse to come.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 13 of 269:
|
Mar 5 17:13 UTC 1996 |
I agree.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 14 of 269:
|
Mar 5 23:41 UTC 1996 |
If Grex is having problems with the lease or landlord then the
situation must be communicated to the users. Grex belongs to
the users, not the staff, not the Board. It is the Board's
responsiblity to keep them informed as stated in the Bylaws.
I suggest we look for a new location so that if the landlord
decides to serve us notice of non-renewal we aren't simply
left with 2 months in which to panic.
|
ajax
|
|
response 15 of 269:
|
Mar 5 23:50 UTC 1996 |
When it the term of the contract up? I thought both parties agreed to a
three year contact about a year and a half ago, as neither party wanted
the work put into the dungeon to go to waste after only a one year lease.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 16 of 269:
|
Mar 6 00:34 UTC 1996 |
Did that extension ever make it to a formal agreement?
If not our current lease could expire October 31, 1996.
|
kerouac
|
|
response 17 of 269:
|
Mar 6 03:20 UTC 1996 |
Maybe this it totally unrealistic, but it seems like it would be neat
if Grex could eventually reside in the basement or a backroom of the
gigabyte cafe. It would be the only board anywhere that actually exsists
in a cybercafe. Valerie, what kind of space are you renting for your
place? I'm sure you'd be paid a fair price for being grex's landlord!
|
srw
|
|
response 18 of 269:
|
Mar 6 06:17 UTC 1996 |
But our landlord does want us to stay. I am not certain whether the
multi year portion of the agreement is formalized, though. Without a
contract, of course, there is no certainty, but Nick has given us no indication
that he would be unwilling to extend the lease.
I have no objection to Grex investigating the possibility of moving,
without committing itself. That's prudent.
I agree that the board should keep the users informed, but that doesn't
mean that all the details involving a dispute or negotiation should
be posted publicly. There are privacy issues and strategy issues that make
that work against the best interest of Grex.
|
scg
|
|
response 19 of 269:
|
Mar 6 07:04 UTC 1996 |
I agree with srw that there are areas of this situation that should not be
discussed publically. That's just common sense. We strive to be as open as
possible here, and in general that's a very good thing, but there are some
things that we shouldn't discuss openly, at least not until they are resolved.
I hope people can understand why. Therefore, I'm going to make one
clairification, and then shut up.
The building that Grex is in is owned by two people, and I believe our
landlord is both of them, rather than just the one who we are on good terms
with. However, it is the one who we are on good terms with who signs leases
in that partnership, as far as I know, so we are fine there.
Yes, we should always be keeping our eyes out for other locations, bug Grex
is not in a financial position to take moving to a place with higher rent,
or moving all 13 of our phone lines (at $42 each for reinstallation that would
be $546) lightly. If at all possible, we need to try to work the current
situation out. There is no question that we are legally in the right here.
|
chelsea
|
|
response 20 of 269:
|
Mar 6 07:59 UTC 1996 |
I would think this would be obvious but, just in case...
Of course there may be a few details wound through a problem such as this
where it might be prudent to withhold some information from public
discussion. But I'd suspect these instances are few indeed. And even in
such rare cases the Board and staff's responsibility would still be to
keep the users in the know as much as possible. I'd sure rather see an
item say, "Here is what's happening, but there are a few details we'll have
to leave out for the time being, but know we're working on getting this
resolved," than the entire discussion take place in baff mail or in the
Staff conference with the users totally out of the loop.
This is not a trivial point. It is central to what Grex is about.
|
scott
|
|
response 21 of 269:
|
Mar 6 12:10 UTC 1996 |
Well, I didn't want all this out yet, for the simple reason that we are
essentially making accusations against somebody. I agree that our users
should be informed, but this issue was still very much unresolved.
|
adbarr
|
|
response 22 of 269:
|
Mar 6 12:35 UTC 1996 |
There is a dispute resolution service around here in Washtenaw County,
someplace. It, most likely, is premised on two sides having some
ability to be rational, and that may not be the case with the rogue landlord
person, but it might be worth a try. Of course, the big hurdle will be
getting the rogue landlord-person to the table in the first place. Can the
issue even be discussed with the person causing the problems? If not . . .
|
popcorn
|
|
response 23 of 269:
|
Mar 6 13:38 UTC 1996 |
Re 22: The several times I've tried, I had no luck at all.
Re the lease: The text of it is in the file /usr/local/grexdoc/archives/lease;
it's been posted there for years. We have a verbal agreement with Nick to
renew 'til 1997, but it has never been put into formal writing, so I'm not
sure what its status is.
Re 17: The Gigabyte Cafe, if it happens at all, is still far enough in the
future that it assuredly isn't ready to go making offers to house Grex. Also,
I'd *very* strongly hesitate to put Grex into someone's personal space instead
of on neutral turf.
I hope it's OK to say this here: STeve is investigating an unlikely but
possible option which would involve a new home for Grex *and* better net
connectivity. It's still only a very remote possibility, though it would
be very nice if it panned out.
|
steve
|
|
response 24 of 269:
|
Mar 6 14:24 UTC 1996 |
I will say that I'm always doing things like this, talking to people
and seeing if anything might happen farther down the road a bit. I've
also started looking at other spaces in Ann Arbor. I know more about
the commercial rental scene now than I did a couple of years ago, so
I expect that I'll find more possibilities this time 'round. Of course,
it's still a matter of money: if we had $200 a month for rent we could
move next week.
|