|
Grex > Coop7 > #140: Does Grex need a new fair-witness for the Poetry conference? |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
rlawson
|
|
Does Grex need a new fair-witness for the Poetry conference?
|
Dec 23 15:43 UTC 1995 |
I recently sent the following letter to peacefrg@cyberspace.org ...
Dear James,
Hello! Please allow me to inroduce myself. I am Robert Lawson, a Grex users,
helper, and frequenter of the Poetry conference in which you are named the
fair-witness. I was thinking about enter an item in the Co-op conference
about this matter but I decided that I should speak with you first.
I think the Poetry conference needs a new fair-witness if you are not on
Grex enough to maintain your fair-witness duties. Then again, for the Poetry
conference, do we really need a fair-witness?
A fair-witness is a person who is supposed to
be "responsible" for the contents of the conference.
The fair-witness's primary job is to keep people on
track by encouraging useful responses and at the same
time encouraging less useful discussions to move to
other more appropriate conferences.
Of less importance, a fairwitness can also kill items
and maintain the login, logout, and index files.
I don't see a need for someone to delete items in this conference and login
and logout files don't need to be "maintained", they're there and they work
fine. I still think that so much more can be done with that conference and
you are just not around to do those things. I, therefore, think that Grex
needs a new fair-witness for its Poetry conference. Please, I'd like to
hear your response and whether you agree or disagree. And if you are acting
as "phantom" fair-witness and just not responding to items and making your
appearance known, I'm truly sorry. I await your reply.
- Robert
... and I did wait for a reply. One minute later, I got one. The address in
peacefrg's .forward file is peacefrg@m-net148.arbornet.org. I reply I got was
from MAILER-DAEMON@m-net.arbornet.org saying that peacefrg was an unknown user
and so the mail was returned to me. However, I do think we need a new fair-
witness in the Poetry conference. Does anyone agree? Disagree? How would I
go about taking this matter any further?
|
| 88 responses total. |
mta
|
|
response 1 of 88:
|
Dec 23 16:00 UTC 1995 |
Robert, are you volunteering? ;)
|
steve
|
|
response 2 of 88:
|
Dec 23 16:00 UTC 1995 |
Well, it probably needs a steward to some extent, as most conferences
do. You can start that by moving it along, espically if James isn't here
often any more. You can become the effective FW before FWship is actually
transferred.
|
srw
|
|
response 3 of 88:
|
Dec 23 16:50 UTC 1995 |
Hmm. Regarding peacefrg, he has logged on to Grex within the last week.
When it is called to our attention, the staff will usuallly remove a .forward
file that points to an invalid mailbox. I just verified that peacefrg
has no account on m-net, so I'll go do that, and then James should
see mail sent here the next time he logs in.
Try sending him mail again.
|
scg
|
|
response 4 of 88:
|
Dec 23 19:21 UTC 1995 |
Also, this discussion really concerns the Poetry conference more than anything
else, so it might be a good idea to have this discussion there, or at least
link it there.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 5 of 88:
|
Dec 23 19:31 UTC 1995 |
If I ever find James, I'll ask him to link it.
|
popcorn
|
|
response 6 of 88:
|
Dec 23 21:39 UTC 1995 |
Someone mentioned that the poetry conference had over 400 items. Sounds like
it might be due for a re-start. Generally it's the fair witness's decision
to ask for a re-start...
|
rlawson
|
|
response 7 of 88:
|
Dec 23 22:44 UTC 1995 |
The Poetry conference currently has more than 550 items.
|
remmers
|
|
response 8 of 88:
|
Dec 24 00:59 UTC 1995 |
Right, it certainly doesn't need any help in the "move it along"
department. It sprouts new items at a faster rate than Agora.
Has a nice personality to it too. There's a group of enthusiastic
amatuer poets that have settled in there and are having a grand
time. I don't see that there's any big problem with it that needs
to be fixed. I'd almost consider it proof that some conferences
don't need fairwitnesses.
|
remmers
|
|
response 9 of 88:
|
Dec 24 01:08 UTC 1995 |
(Oh, and I also agree that this is all best discussed in the
poetry conference itself.)
|
rlawson
|
|
response 10 of 88:
|
Dec 24 01:40 UTC 1995 |
I'm not sure if I made myself clear in #0; however, I have no wish to become
the f-w of the Poetry. I merely noted that peacefrg has not been active in
that conference and was wondering what should be done. I'm trying to look at
this from all perspectives and I quite agree that, in some ways, the Poetry
conference does not need a fair-witness.
If possible, could someone with root powers link this item into the Poetry
conference so that other could voice their opinions and concerns? Thank you.
|
kitten
|
|
response 11 of 88:
|
Dec 24 01:49 UTC 1995 |
Ha ha. I've been brought in special for this item.
As for the poetry conference...some of the users push i heavily.
(recruiters extrodinaire). Anyway... the poetry conference is not the type
of thing you would ever restart. Poetry that was good yesterday
is still good today. I highly recommend anyone who's interested in poetry
read through the old poems, even more so than the new ones. you can
follow the whole evolution of people's poetry and in effect lives.
Anyway, I spoke with peacefrg several months ago on m-net. that was the last
I saw or heard from him, and the last tiem there was a response from him
in the poetry conference was before I logged on to grex (about 6 months).
It's true the conference has grown 400+ items since then. But it's
hard to encourage people to (new people_ to join it. I've posted 100
of those items (one day I got bored and counted). They're not the
*600* response kind of items you see in other cf's either. 30-40
is a big number for poetry.
And there are things a fw's could've done with the conference in the last
six months that haven't been done, as robert said. I tried mailing peacefrog
myself (except I spelled it right)...and that was three months ago already.
Things do seem to be going fine though. I suppose we just crave a leader;
and all secretly want to take over without being rude to peacefrg.
--jenna
|
rcurl
|
|
response 12 of 88:
|
Dec 24 05:49 UTC 1995 |
Is the "problem" only that the fw is not in evidence? I am a fw of several
cfs in which I have done nothing because nothing appears needed (or
requested). So far, they don't seem to need a fw, and perhaps as remmers
notes, perhaps neither does poetry.
|
shade
|
|
response 13 of 88:
|
Dec 24 08:07 UTC 1995 |
Well various pc regulars have tried to get in touch with
peacefrg about some changes that need to be made or some
suggestions and could not find the poor devil
|
popcorn
|
|
response 14 of 88:
|
Dec 24 12:45 UTC 1995 |
You might send mail to otter and wolfmage; they know peacefrg personally and
might have some idea where to find him.
|
bubu
|
|
response 15 of 88:
|
Dec 24 15:53 UTC 1995 |
Hmmm a FW in poetry....I never knew one existed....
|
adbarr
|
|
response 16 of 88:
|
Dec 24 18:17 UTC 1995 |
gregc should be the fw of poetry. He understands your needs.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 17 of 88:
|
Dec 24 20:26 UTC 1995 |
From peacefrg@grex.cyberspace.orgSun Dec 24 15:23:59 1995
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 1995 15:15:32 -0500 (EST)
From: James Edel <peacefrg@grex.cyberspace.org>
To: Robert Lawson <rlawson@grex.cyberspace.org>
Subject: Re: Does Grex need a new Poetry fair-witness?
Robert,
I agree. Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am not on Grex
all that often anymore. So, I put my office up for vote. Whoever is the
most capable of handling the poetry conf can take over.
Thanks for bringing this up. I haven't had the time.
James
----------
I just received the above letter from James. So that we can discuss the future
of the poetry conference, I ask that this item be linked to poetry by whoever
can do it or do I need to start an item there?
|
sidhe
|
|
response 18 of 88:
|
Dec 25 03:04 UTC 1995 |
I wonder- is this item at all linkable without James' assistance?
|
rlawson
|
|
response 19 of 88:
|
Dec 25 04:14 UTC 1995 |
Anyone with root can link it, or so I've been told.
|
scg
|
|
response 20 of 88:
|
Dec 25 06:57 UTC 1995 |
Anyone with root *can*, but I'd rather have it done by one of the cfadms
(I think they all have root, but not everybody with root is also a cfadm).
|
remmers
|
|
response 21 of 88:
|
Dec 25 09:37 UTC 1995 |
[Item 140 in Coop is now linked at Item 557 in the Poetry conference.]
|
peacefrg
|
|
response 22 of 88:
|
Dec 25 19:50 UTC 1995 |
Hello, The little devil is found :)
I lost access to a terminal recently and I haven't been able to log on more
than once a month. When I started the Poetry conf I hoped that it would go
over good. It appears that it has so I don't want to see it die because I
can't keep up as FW. So, since you guys know the poetry conf regulars better
than I do, please elect somebody new as FW so this conf can get back to
healthy status. Thanks for your concern.
James
|
brighn
|
|
response 23 of 88:
|
Dec 25 20:42 UTC 1995 |
Jenna (shade/kitten/etc.) brought this up several months ago, and I
recall her being interested then. I would recommend her as FW. If
she's uninterested, any of several other regulars (John Remmers, Michael
DeLizia, Erinn, myself) would be competent. I'd be willing, I just
don't want to hog FW-ships (and I'm main FW for two confs already, and
have an interest in another...).
The main thing that needs doing is linking items from other confs.
The Forest Suite exists twice b/c I entered it on After Dark and there
was nobody to like in to Poetry. It would have been nice to be able
to link it over, instead.
Deleting accidental items would also be useful... I think that may
have happened once or twice (where the person presses "e" instead of
"r" at the Respond or Pass? prompt and doesn't realize it until it's
too late). I think deleting actual poetry items, though, would be
inappropriate, and it certainly doesn't need any encouragement for
growth. The conference is a freaking virus as it is. ;)
So, IMHO (as a regular of the Poetry conf):
(1) I think Poetry needs a minimal-duty FW.
(2) I think Jenna would be the best choice, given her activity, if she's
intersted.
|
rlawson
|
|
response 24 of 88:
|
Dec 25 21:32 UTC 1995 |
I wouldn't mind seeing Dan Hoppe (bubu) as f-w, if he is at all interested.
I would recommend John Remmers (remmers) I don't think he has the time as he
just resigned, to my understanding, as f-w of the reality cf because he didn't
have the time. So, there's my .02 worth.
|