You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-47         
 
Author Message
carson
Discussion on the party program and its clientele Mark Unseen   Feb 11 10:13 UTC 1995

There was some discussion in item #9 about the party program and those
who use it. This item is intended to continue that discussion.
47 responses total.
carson
response 1 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 10:14 UTC 1995

From item #9:

,E
,R0000
,U13455,nephi
,AImade Itup
,D2f3b272f
,T
(Gee, I saw mine... )

(Also, I have heard people describe vehemently how poorly they were treated
while here on Grex.  I'm pretty sure it was in party, and probably by some
of the thirteen year-olds that frequent the place, as they have tended to 
come off rather unfriendly towards me, as well.  To be sure, though, Grex
is acquiring a rather nasty reputation for being mean over on m-net, at 
least by those that frequent party there.)
,E
,R0000
,U2660,carson
,AFluffy Green Thingy
,D2f3b5979
,T
I broke up a fight in party the other day...
,E
,R0000
,U112,popcorn
,AValerie Mates
,D2f3b74e9
,T
Addendum to 168: Carson, my comment (the one that bothered you) was
also intended to be funny, though I guess it didn't come out that way.
I apologize again.  :(

Party sure makes a bad first impression on people who find it before
they find the conferences....
,E
,R0000
,U12030,sidhe
,AChrstopher Anton Cloyd
,D2f3b818f
,T
        That's precisely what I was referring to; party. Most newbies like
        party, because you can come and go as you please, and the comments get
        the "instant
gratification" effect via immediate responses. Also, it's far less daunting
than PicoSpan is, for a newbie. Unfortunately, we have acquired a lot of
"gnats" Down there lately.. ,E ,R0000 ,U13455,nephi ,AImade Itup ,D2f3bc540 ,T
It seems really odd that PicoSpan comes off daunting.  There are only really
about 5, or so commands that one has to remember to be able to use the  thing,
and most of them are shown in the form of prompts!  

(Then again, when I was a newuser here, I remember the conferences seeming
that way, as well.)
,E
,R0000
,U12030,sidhe
,AChrstopher Anton Cloyd
,D2f3bcbd5
,T
        Precisely. Remeber back, and look through THOSE eyes..
I have yet to see every cf here.
,E
,R0000
,U1827,rcurl
,ARane Curl
,D2f3be46d
,T
I rather dislike Grex being judged by what is done in party. Grex is
a conferencing system, which runs party software also. If what occurs
there is sufficiently detrimental to Grex's reputation, there would be
a point in discussing discontinuing party. Perhaps a first step would be
to keep party goers aware of that possibility.
,E
,R0000
,U5106,ajax
,ARob Argy
,D2f3bf11b
,T
Who's to say it isn't a party system, which runs conference software also? :)
I hear ya though.  But I'd worry that a threat to partiers might backfire.
,E
,R0000
,U107,mdw
,AMarcus D. Watts
,D2f3c20d3
,T
I have not noticed the problems people here are describing in party.
Curiously, I have noticed people in party here commenting about how
people on m-net can be mean in party towards newcomers.  And
occasionally people do show up in party who are not entirely civilized,
but it's very much the exception rather than the rule.
,E
,R0000
,U110,steve
,ASTeve Andre'
,D2f3c2f9e
,T
   There are alrady people who've judged Grex by party.  Someone
from the Ann Arbor Observer was one of them.  I got a letter from her
about Grex saying that we seemed friendly enough but that a lot of
the people she was chatting with seemed somewhat childish.

   I fully share Rane's dislike of this.
,E
,R0000
,U1046,gerund
,AGerald E. Peck
,D2f3c7674
,T
# 175 bothers me, because while it's Rane's view of what Grex is it's not
everyone's view.  If you don't like what you find in party then don't
go there.  Most people can handle that.
As for people who have judged Grex by party that's like judging the
United States by a visit to New York City.  It's not the
fault of partiers and those that enjoy party when someone judges Grex
by what they see in one particular area of Grex that they don't
happen to like.
Some of you seem to be worried about losing users users who are put
off by party.  I think you have a bigger threat of losing users who
are put off by a confusing conferencing system.  Picospan is
wonderful, and as much as I like it I know plenty of people
who have come to me complaining about how different it is from other
sites and how hard it is to become used to it.  I would mention the
lag problem, but that seems to be pretty much under control
at least from my perspective.

Grex is going to be what the users make of it.  No one rams party
down anyone's throat.  If newusers aren't aware of the other
'attractions' of Grex outside of party then perhaps the individuals
who wish them to be made aware should do something about
it.
,E
,R0000
,U2660,carson
,AFluffy Green Thingy
,D2f3c8c62
,T
<not to piss on Gerund YET AGAIN, but...>

I agree with #175, including its call for possible *discussion*, but, as
remmers reminded us earlier, this *is* the "Conference Proposals" item,
and we *really* shouldn't be drifting here, so I'll do something, i.e.,
enter item for above discussion, rather than simply talk about it and
wonder why other people aren't acting.
,E
gerund
response 2 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 10:42 UTC 1995

I think that #1, before I say anything I should make Carson aware that
usually when I enter anything in the BBS it's to answer a question
if I can or to state my opinion on a particular subject.
I don't tend to 'act' unless I care about something enough to act on it.
I'm sure Carson is probably quite aware of THAT.
Usually I'd rather give my 2 cents on a subject and let others decide
what to make of it or what to DO if anything.  On the rare
occasion that I care about something enough I will ACT on it.
An example of this is when I entered the item asking for private
party channels.  Usually, however, I don't care to get involved in
very many issues, because I dislike arguements and would rather
save myself the trouble of being flamed regarding something I really
don't give a care about.  I'm beginning to think my attitude is going
to change in that area, however.  I hope the stress doesn't kill me.  :)

Now to get back on subject:

I'd like to hear what Rane's particular concerns are, and anyone else's
as well.  I personally don't view Grex as solely a conferencing system
or even primarily a conferencing system.  Amoung other things I view
it as a place where I can meet new and interesting people from around
the world in a real-time format.  It's a place where I can send and receive
messages on a wide variety of subjects, both in the BBS and via
mail.  I can play an online game if I have the inclination to do so.
Grex is diverse, and I'd really like to see it stay that way.  I believe
any steps towards eliminating party or anything else for that matter
would detract from Grex as a whole.
carson
response 3 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 11:14 UTC 1995

I tend to agree with Gerald's last paragraph. Grex has a number of 
wonderful features and programs, all with the potential for great
good and for great abuse, none of which are forced upon individual
users. I don't think discontinuing PicoSpan, party, trn, mathom,
mail, or any similar program would solve problems of abuse, but rather
simply eliminate the problem along with the good. Sometimes this is
necessary; I don't think we have those sorts of cases here, and I'd 
hate to ever witness the like. Users can be both courteous and
disccourteous anywhere; the party's program's blessing and curse is
that both are instantaneous. I think that removing the program
because of a few discourteous users would be like, oh, shutting
down PicoSpan because of WInter item #32: a bit premature, and
very much overkill.

I'm glad that we are able to discuss this problem without acting
first. I think that certain users will see this item and either
reconsider their behavior or maybe seek to encourage those who
are being acrimonious to reconsider theirs. Discussion is good.
gerund
response 4 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 14:50 UTC 1995

As far as good ol' item #32 goes, I don't believe I remember
anyone suggesting that picospan be shut down.
Oh, and Carson, sometimes people chnage their stance on issues.
Just thought I'd mention that.
carson
response 5 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 17:45 UTC 1995

re #4: I hadn't meant to suggest that anyone had suggested
        shutting down PicoSpan; I was drawing a comparison.
        Sorry you were confused by that.
lilmo
response 6 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 22:19 UTC 1995

What about limiting use of party to users that have been here for some time?
This would prevent newusers from too easily being influenced solely by party,
and allow "discurteous" users to discover that they are not welcome here.
gerund
response 7 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 02:37 UTC 1995

Why stop at limiting them from party?
You seem to be proceeding on the assumption that party is going to turn
people off from Grex.  Strange, but some people come to Grex SOLEY for
party and you'd be losing them if you took away their access to it.
How do you define "discurteous"?
And btw, I thought everyone was welcome on Grex while it was only
certain BEHAVIOURS that weren't welcome.
steve
response 8 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 05:24 UTC 1995

   Yeah, I haveta agree.  This gets into the classic "What is Grex"
discussion.
   If we shunted people away from party, solely because othe fact
that 'new' folks can't get at it, we've just made digital forbidden
fruit.
ajax
response 9 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 07:09 UTC 1995

If the only complaint about party is it could scare away new users, here's
an idea: when party is started, if the user's account is under a week old,
display a message like "Party participants can sometimes be rude or
immature.  If you don't like it, the conferences are (usually!) more civil."
And maybe add some directions to pico.  I don't particularly like this idea,
but mentione it in case someone else does :).
carson
response 10 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 07:42 UTC 1995

I dunno; I'd rather see that line with directions to chat help or 
something similar. 
rcurl
response 11 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 08:52 UTC 1995

"Now that I have your attention..." ;-)

First, my position with respect to party: I look sometimes but I do not
participate because I think it has become largely puerile.

puerile (adj.). Pertaining to or characteristic of childhood; juvenile;
hence, immature; weak; silly; as a *puerile* suggestion. See synonyms
under childish, youthful. 

That is not a criticism. Few of us were not "juvenile; hence, immature" at
one time. I find nothing wrong with a place for puerile interactions on
Grex. The first problem, though, is that everyone should understand it for
what it is. Experienced bbsers know what to expect (I have not found party
on any system that is not puerile), and need not participate without
drawing conclusions about the whole system. Unfortunately, as noted, there
are many more inexperienced bbsers than experienced, so many jump to
conclusions, or are simply annoyed, or even horrified, by what they find
in the much-vaunted party. 

I am not sure what kind of "warning" can be given to system users that,
when they join party, they are stepping into a puerile environment. I
think that if one is given, it should only be at the moment of entering
party, and it should (obviously) not be worded to disparage party. 
Perhaps the message should be more along the lines of "Si gustibus non
diputandum est."

The *second* problem is more serious. This is that the level of civilized
behavior and respect for others that is strongly encouraged on Grex, and
which exists largely in Picospan (through some cultural development whose
mechanisms is not entirely clear - not all conference systems are as
civilized), apparently does not extend as fully to party - at least, if
the alleged complaints are true (I have not experienced rudeness in party,
but perhaps because I spend so little time there). *If* it is true that
civility sometimes pales in party, then it is of concern to Grex. How
could this be repaired? The best method that I can think of at the moment,
is to extend the same mechanism that keeps Picospan moderately civilized
to party: the frequent and experienced users set examples and even
exercise some civilized correction to those that show disrespect to
others. 

chelsea
response 12 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 12:50 UTC 1995

I thought there were multiple channels involved and if you didn't
like what was happening in one you could move (or create) another?
Is there room on Grex for those who just want to play with less
mature behaviors?  Isn't respect a by-product of tolerance?

Let it be.
sidhe
response 13 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 18:20 UTC 1995

        Ideally, yes, it is.

        The whole idea of shutting off party for newbies is *ludicrous*.
It was the original reason I came aboard, and, had it not been available,
I would've gone off to look at other systems <I had over 100 to choose from
on the metronet gopher, one of which was M-Net, who's party is *truly*
juvenile. I don't think calling our party that is quite fair, but to
each their opine..>.
        In other words, yes there are rude people in party, occasionally,
and yes, they do occasionally scare off the newbies, BUT, I believe
restricting party in any way <such askeeping newbies out, or shutting it
down entirely> is the worst thing you could do.

avi
response 14 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 01:10 UTC 1995

Well, I agree with shutting party out from newbies COULD be a bad idea
in that, well to be honest, for sometimes, whenever I receive a help
message that I can't answer, I usually go looking for another helper.
There have been times when I couldn't get another helper, BUT there
were about 15 people in party.  I usually tell the help-seeker to come to
party and ask the same question.  Or if I have another window on grex open
I'll just ask it myself =).  True, we do get the usual gang
of nit-wits (net-wits, possibly) who sit there cussing, racial slurs,
blab on about their homophobia, etc, etc.  That's why there was a filter
option made.  
        I'm really interested (and have started on) in working on a shell
script that you can run, that starts off asking you who to filter.
And you could filter as many people as you choose, with a pipe.
Then that'll create a file name 'filt' in the users home dir,
and then the user will load :s filter="/u/user/filt".
        Maybe I was wrong in entering a responce, after all,
my temper is probably one of the larger ones in Grex Party...e
(only used on the nitwits mentioned before, though)
steve
response 15 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 04:06 UTC 1995

    oooh--lets not come up with a system that asks you who to
ignore.  We're doing things the wrong way if all we can do to
work on party problems is come up with something to systematically
ignore problem people.
popcorn
response 16 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 14:07 UTC 1995

I've been thinking it would make sense to stick a shell script around
party that displays up to three messages.  There'd be a "party motd"
that shows up every time you run party (and is kept very short),
a "party welcome message" that is shown only once, the first time you
run party, and a "party news" file that is only displayed when its
contents change.
rcurl
response 17 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 15:49 UTC 1995

I like that idea. Do you have suggestions for the contents of each?
sidhe
response 18 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 18:00 UTC 1995

        I like it better than the filter..
avi
response 19 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 20:08 UTC 1995

FINE!  Just turn down my ideas! :) j/k 
Anyway, come to think of it, I really DO like Valerie's idea better 
than mine...
But what is to be said about the unpolite people who come into party
and do nothing but flood (the term I use to mean push spacebar-return
amillion times and say nothing intelligent.  There are many people who
don't have the slightest idea on how to use grep/egrep/fgrep.
I'm not going to suggest that the whole source be edited by janc just to
make it easier for users.  Just a suggestion for a shell script.
Looking at what I just typed, I seemed to forgot a close parenthesis..
) -- there we go.
gerund
response 20 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 00:05 UTC 1995

Although, to be absolutely honest, I sometimes enjoy having the ability
to read files into party I would be willing to lose that option so
that party users would not have to put up with inconsiderate people
reading 'flood' files, binaries, and full length line files into party.
If I want to show somebody a file I can just as easily tell
them to type, say for example, !cat blahblahblah | more.
I realize that this is only one of the problems people are
having with party, and this may or may not be a workable solution
to that problem.
I do like Valerie's idea because I think it would
help eliminate the biggest problem facing newusers, and that is
ignorance about the many features (and possible pitfalls) of Grex.
ajax
response 21 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 01:20 UTC 1995

Gerald, I think most people have "ASCII upload" or cut-and-paste options in
their comm programs, so those intent on being annoying would be only 
moderately inconvenienced.
selena
response 22 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 03:06 UTC 1995

        But you haven't seen the stuff they read into there! My LEAST favorite
is the "Belligerant-c;ass starship" that resembles the USS Enterprise
<next Gen>, except that the warp pods are distorted into a pair of
middle fingers! It takes up alot of screen space, and for little more
than flipping off everyone present!
        I don't want to set myself up with noshowread, because I enjoy the
<real> poetry that sometimes people will import there..
carson
response 23 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 03:52 UTC 1995

re #14: if you can come up with an easy filter, LET ME KNOW. I wrecked
        my .profile two days ago trying to use the one in the info .cf.

Methinks I was trying to twit too many people... ;)
popcorn
response 24 of 47: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 04:28 UTC 1995

Hm.  Could you enter a response in the info conference to warn
people off from whatever it was that caused problems for you?  Thanks!

Re 17: Ideas for contents of the files...

party motd:  This might often be empty.  Sometimes it would run a message
like "we have now upgraded to version 2.7l of party", or "private party
channel names have now switched from _x to _z", or "co-op item 103
discusses some possible changes to party; if you care, please read it!",
or "this is the new party motd; you will see it every time you run party".

party news file: This is the file that would be displayed only when its
contents changed.  It would contain things like more information about _x
and _z channels, or info about what is different in the latest version of
party.

party welcome message for new users: This message would be shown only once,
for people who had never used party before.  The message would contain some
party use and etiquette tips, a carefully worded caveat about how some people
find they don't like party but they do like conferencing, and maybe some
info about how to write help.  Unlike the other messages, this one would make
you press Enter before putting you into party.
 0-24   25-47         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss