You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   105-129   130   131-155   156-180 
 181-205   206-230   231-255   256-280   281-305   306-330   331-355   356-380   381-405 
 406-430   431-455   456-480        
 
Author Message
1 new of 480 responses total.
rcurl
response 130 of 480: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 17:33 UTC 2006

Spam might be thought of as an infection, and spam blocking is equivalent to
antibiotics. However is there any potential for *immunization*? I imagine an
"anti-spam bot" that infects people's computers with a spam-bot killer
application. I can see an ethical question in this - immunizing users'
computers without their knowledge - but that is till better than the
infection, especially as the "anti-spam bot" could be made to have no side
effects. 
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   105-129   130   131-155   156-180 
 181-205   206-230   231-255   256-280   281-305   306-330   331-355   356-380   381-405 
 406-430   431-455   456-480        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss