You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   98-122   123   124-148   149-173   174-198 
 199-223   224-236         
 
Author Message
1 new of 236 responses total.
spooked
response 123 of 236: Mark Unseen   Dec 27 06:21 UTC 2006

You don't "have to" change, but if Grex wants to move forward (and I'm 
seriously doubting that) then big changes have to take place, because the 
current processes have totally screwed the production line and it cannot 
keep good people enthusiastically particpating in staffing it (note, this 
does NOT include symbolicly staffing it, either).

If you think geez Grex must be great because of its balance sheet -- you're 
a moron.  Most of Grex's shallow bank account stays propped up because of 
large one-off occasional generous donors.  The question you should be 
asking is if Grex was financially sound (and it is not) is what services 
or give backs has/is it providing to the user/community base.  You only 
need to log onto freeshell.org and know half a degree or two about 
Unix/bbs/conferencing to see Grex is well over a decade behind and 
falling further and further behind every second.

It's sad enough that Grex is in the position it is in.  What's even more 
tragic is that supposedly responsible/intelligent/caring Grex-folk think 
it is all lovely and snuggly.




 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   98-122   123   124-148   149-173   174-198 
 199-223   224-236         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss