|
|
| Author |
Message |
boanne
|
|
Composer bios?
|
Jul 1 09:07 UTC 1999 |
Hello Everyone,
I would like to know where on the InterNet I can find biographical information
on classical composers....could anyone point me to some good websites?
Thank You,
Boanne
|
| 14 responses total. |
albaugh
|
|
response 1 of 14:
|
Jul 1 21:49 UTC 1999 |
I believe you've mentioned in another item that you've done internet (web)
searches. Have you not tried that for the composers you're interested in?
|
md
|
|
response 2 of 14:
|
Jul 4 21:50 UTC 1999 |
Try this one:
www.culturefinder.com/cgi-bin/culturefinder/cf/content/music/allstar
(The whole thing including http wouldn't fit. Sorry.)
It's a list 40 composers. Click on a name and you get the
bio. On the bio pages you'll find links to a few selected
compositions. Click on one of them, and you get a brief
descrption of the composition, and in most cases a link to
a CDNOW page that features playable excerpts from the
composition. It's a nice format.
|
dbratman
|
|
response 3 of 14:
|
Jul 21 21:43 UTC 1999 |
I visited the Culturefinder page referred to in the previous post. I
liked their selection of composers and works, but found the writing to
be largely puerile and somewhat inaccurate. They tell you that
Bruckner's Fourth is his only symphony with a nickname, but don't
provide the nickname, and they tell you he "played on Wagner's team",
which tells you a lot about cultural history but very little about
Bruckner's music and that misleading.
A generally good classical website with a lot more info is at
www.classical.net. But for this type of information, good old books
are still superior. There's lots of very useful guides for beginning
collectors, and for biographies Harold C. Schoenberg's "Lives of the
Great Composers" is still as well-written and informative as anything
out there.
|
md
|
|
response 4 of 14:
|
Jul 22 15:40 UTC 1999 |
The CultureFinder format was the brainchild of
a popularizer whose name I forget. The "team"
format is impossible to follow if you want to write
something intelligent. The format for individual
works is a little better ("Cocktail Party Fact,"
"Commitment Factor." etc.) but still limiting.
I think the idea was to produce snappy little
encomia that might attract a new listener.
|
md
|
|
response 5 of 14:
|
Jul 22 15:42 UTC 1999 |
(But I still like the way CF takes you from composer
to specific composition to playable excerpt.)
|
faile
|
|
response 6 of 14:
|
Aug 2 02:01 UTC 1999 |
If you are interested in some Middle Ages and Rennisance info, one of
the possible projects for one of Vandy's upper level music history
classes is a web page (I didn't do that, because I didn't want to
bother....) the address for those is:
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/Blair/Courses/MUSL242
(There are also some other links from the 242 homepage that could be
useful.
For Baroque and Classical pages, check out:
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/Blair/Courses/MUSL253/243gate.htm
|
dbratman
|
|
response 7 of 14:
|
Jan 23 23:30 UTC 2001 |
This seemed like perhaps the best place to drop in this little news
item, which is that the Newer edition of the New Grove Encyclopedia of
Music and Musicians has been published. The previous edition came out
in 1980, so this is not an everyday event.
The 1980 edition, first to be called "New", was a complete overhaul of
the work. The 2001 edition is basically an update, though with many
new articles on older matters, as well as a lot of additions on recent
music. I was cheered to see, checking its articles on some of the more
tonal composers of the late 20th century, a complete freedom from the
rigid avant-garde orthodoxy that blighted so much musicological
thinking (though not always in Grove's) of that time. I was less
pleased to see some of the errors I found in work-lists in the 1980
edition preserved unchanged.
Grove's emphasis has always been on "classical" or Western art music,
though there is plenty on ethnomusicology, and the new edition has made
a determined effort to add short articles on major, and even medium-
level, pop musicians of various kinds. They need not have bothered:
there are now much superior multi-volume encyclopedias of pop, jazz,
etc., and the little articles in Grove's don't tell you much. But
there's nothing else (certainly not the over-rated Baker's) that covers
classical with anywhere near Grove's thoroughness.
I haven't seen the print edition yet, but the online edition is up.
It's pretty cool: if, like me, you're affiliated with a major
university or other institution that might subscribe, look it up. The
web address is www.grovemusic.com.
|
md
|
|
response 8 of 14:
|
Apr 23 15:13 UTC 2005 |
Whatever happened to Boanne Lorraine?
|
naftee
|
|
response 9 of 14:
|
Apr 23 16:18 UTC 2005 |
he/she went on your twit filter :(
|
md
|
|
response 10 of 14:
|
Apr 24 00:22 UTC 2005 |
No no no, there was some controversy about her. She left in a huff or
was hounded off or something. Now I have to go find the items. Don't
go away.
|
naftee
|
|
response 11 of 14:
|
Apr 24 05:01 UTC 2005 |
I hope valerie didn't delete those items :(
|
md
|
|
response 12 of 14:
|
Apr 24 13:04 UTC 2005 |
Can't find 'em, going back to 1996. Either it was before that or else
it was some other cf than agora. She pissed off a lot of people here.
Oh well, you can go away now. :(
|
naftee
|
|
response 13 of 14:
|
Apr 24 17:21 UTC 2005 |
too unlucky
|
md
|
|
response 14 of 14:
|
Apr 26 00:59 UTC 2005 |
Yeah, you woulda liked her.
|