You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-165    
 
Author Message
richard
Siskel & Ebert & Grex-- the Movie Review item Mark Unseen   Jan 11 23:48 UTC 1999

This is the movie review item, where we post reviews of movies we have 
seen either in the theater, or rented, and have genera film discusion.
165 responses total.
richard
response 1 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 00:06 UTC 1999

Okay, here's a terrific film recommendation to start things off:

AFFLICTION--  This is writer Russell Banks followup to the "Sweet 
Hereafter" (if you saw that movie, it was a very very dark, character 
study about the residents of a small town in Canada-- great film)  
Anyway this stars Nick Nolte as a policeman in a small upstate New 
Hampshire town.  The dominant relationship in his life is with his 
father who hates him.  His daughter is afraid of him.  His girlfriend 
doesnt understand him.  The film chronicles his slow, steady breakdown 
over a period of weeks, as he becomes a prisoner of alcoholism and 
paranoia.  The movie starts with Nolte's character on the edge, and 
shows him going straight over.  Nolte is deservedly the favorite to win 
the Best Actor Oscar this year, and James Coburn is simply haunting as 
the brutal father who dominates his life and will certainly be up for 
Best Supporting Actor.

"AFFLICTION" is a very intense, dark and disturbing film.  Not one that 
everyone will enjoy therefore, but it is a beautiful work and great 
cinema.  ***** (five stars-- highly recommended)
katie
response 2 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 03:39 UTC 1999

Patch Adams was a sorry film. Sappy.
mcnally
response 3 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 06:31 UTC 1999

  please tell me that that didn't come as a surprise to anyone..  
omni
response 4 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 10:06 UTC 1999

Robin Williams is either on or he's off. Obviously in Patch Adams he's off. It
looked good, but then again, so did Plan 9 ;)

jep
response 5 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 16:25 UTC 1999

We recently saw "Armageddon".  It was sappy, unbelievable, and filled 
with holes.  The characters were cardboard cutouts.  The plot was 
nonexistent.  We hated it.  Really terrible.  Miss it if there's any way 
you can.  

Then we saw "Lost in Space".  It was sappy, unbelievable, and filled 
with holes.  It had unsympathetic characters.  The plot zigzagged around 
a lot.  However, it was a likeable movie, really very well done.  We 
both liked it.  We're even looking forward to the sequel.
md
response 6 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 18:04 UTC 1999

My daughter (age 12) has declared Patch Adams to be the best
movie she's seen since Titanic.  "Better than Titanic," were her
exact words.  My son (age14) spent the entire ride home reciting
funny bits from the movie, which he thought was hilarious.  "He's
standing behind a skeleton while he's talking this cute girl and he
goes, 'I've got a boner.  Wait, I *am* a boner.'   HA HA HA HA!"
I think the movie has its audience.
aruba
response 7 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 18:13 UTC 1999

Re #5:  I was at a lecture once by a computer guy who was asked what software 
was going to be like in the future, and he said we can't really say, because
we don't know how to think right; after all, if you went back in time to the
50s and told a programmer how fast computers were going to be in the 90s, he'd
say, "Wow!  Think of the matrices we could invert with one of those!"

All the way through Lost in Space, I was thinking that if you went back in
time to the 50s and told a TV producer how spectacular special effects would
be in the 90s, he'd say, "Wow!  Think how cool we could make Lost in Space
then!"

I thought there must have been an incredible budget wasted on such a miserable
excuse for a plot.
eieio
response 8 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 19:00 UTC 1999

(Given that "Lost In Space" premiered in 1965, why would anyone in the 50s
know anything about it?)
eieio
response 9 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 20:05 UTC 1999

This isn't a review; it's pure speculation.
 
I'm not saying "Varsity Blues" will necessarily be bad. But let's take a 
look at its pedigree...
 
* Produced by MTV Films, whose previous credits include "Joe's Apartment" 
and "Dead Man On Campus".
 
* Directed by Brian "Eric From Head Of The Class" Robbins, whose last film
was "Good Burger".
 
* Possible mitigating factor is Jon Voight. Although he has some impressive
roles behind him ("Deliverance", "Midnight Cowboy", "Catch 22") he's not
immune to the occasional serious misstep ("Anaconda", "Eternity", "The
All-American Boy").
richard
response 10 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 23:12 UTC 1999

this is now linked to the movies conference...type
"join movies" to join
hhsrat
response 11 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 03:13 UTC 1999

My little brother loved "Good Burger"
hhsrat
response 12 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 03:15 UTC 1999

Why must I always hit the post button before I'm ready??

My little brother loved "Good Burger"

I want to go see "You've Got Mail"  Anyone have any opinions?

I pride myself on the fact that I STILL haven't seen Titanic.  Plot 
summary (from what I can tell) 2 people meet on unsinkable big boat.  2 
people fall in love. Boat sinks.
scg
response 13 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 04:24 UTC 1999

You've Got Mail was pretty good, as a romantic comedy.  It wasn't the geek
flick that I expected, but that's probably a good thing.
aruba
response 14 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 05:23 UTC 1999

This response has been erased.

aruba
response 15 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 05:31 UTC 1999

Re #8:  Whatever.  It was dumb, whenever it ran.
senna
response 16 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 05:38 UTC 1999

Consensus between sekari, phenix, allida, maeve, and I was that You've 
Got Mail would be unwatchable by us for a myriad of reasons, most of 
which relate to our occupance of grex and the various social 
entanglements that tend to go on around here.
omni
response 17 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 08:09 UTC 1999

  hey, I liked Joe's Apartment. It was guilty fun. We all can't be high minded
and arty all the time. Lighten up.
eieio
response 18 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 15:49 UTC 1999

Rat: me to!
</aol>
 
At first, the main reason I didn't see Titanic was that it didn't interest
me. Then, when everyone kept gushing about it and pledging slavish adoration,
I stayed away.
 
Omni: I love dumb-fun movies! But dumb movies aren't necessarily fun, and the
few minutes I spent watching "Joe's Apartment" on TV convinced me I could be
doing something a lot more fun. Without that movie, I may never have done my
taxes.
jiffer
response 19 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 19:03 UTC 1999

Sometimes you need the dumb movies.  Nothing like simple gross humor to make
you feel better.

Dumb movies are great, so are chick flicks. (though chick flicks are
dangerious cos I seem to rent a large quanitity of them and watch them all
in one sitting, feeling sad and depressed and sobby afterwards... which is
always cleansing)
other
response 20 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 04:31 UTC 1999

i liked joe's apartment, too.  but then, i auditioned for the lead role. 
didn't get called back, but didn't expect to either...
steve
response 21 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 04:46 UTC 1999

   Give me an example of a chick flick?
jiffer
response 22 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 05:04 UTC 1999

My Bestfriends Wedding, The Truth About Cats and Dogs, Emma, Pride and
Prejudice, How Stella Got her Grove....

Chick flicks.
remmers
response 23 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 14:06 UTC 1999

I define a chick flick as any movie in which no cars or buildings blow 
up.
md
response 24 of 165: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 18:39 UTC 1999

Titanic was a chick flick.  Do sinking ships count?  Sleepless in
Seattle was a postmodern chick flick: it said, "Look, see how silly
chick flicks are, and the chicks who bawl over them?  Okay, now
we're going to make . . . a chick flick."
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-165    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss