|
|
| Author |
Message |
phenix
|
|
what type do you like
| 
Sep 6 16:46 UTC 2001 |
ok, what features (physical or otherwise) turn you on or catch your eye?
i mean specific one's people..
|
| 158 responses total. |
kewy
|
|
response 1 of 158:
|
Oct 1 04:18 UTC 2001 |
generally dark hair, curly, glasses. Those are 3 main ones.
|
moller
|
|
response 2 of 158:
|
Jan 1 12:29 UTC 2002 |
a Wild woman do turn on.
|
vidar
|
|
response 3 of 158:
|
Jan 1 13:40 UTC 2002 |
I have a preference for albinos, specifically those with the most
severe version of it: bone white skin, white hair, and red eyes.
Also, I tend to like women who are shorter than myself.
|
michaela
|
|
response 4 of 158:
|
Jan 2 08:37 UTC 2002 |
Long dark hair, sturdy build, nice smirk
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 5 of 158:
|
Jan 2 08:52 UTC 2002 |
I love women with red hair, but generally, that with varying degrees
of brunette highlights. Curls are nice, too. Of course, that would
include green or blue-green eyes, and ruddy skin, which is fairly
common.
Good proportion is usually a must for me, although I don't go for
twiggy girls. Top-heavy and bottom-heavy aren't really my thing, i.e.
Dolly Parton and Jennifer Lopez type physiques. Fitness and trimness
are nice, and I think the shift towards slightly muscular women has
been a good thing, granted, when it's natural-- I don't believe in
freaky bodybuilding men or women.. too much muscle is just gross.
But the physical aesthetic only goes so far. It's good for me to be
able to share intellectual conversation that is engaging and mentally
stimulating. While mutual interests are nice, as common ground is
somewhere to start, I do enjoy talking to others who pursue other
interests, especially if they are able to explain them in ways that I
can comprehend and appreciate.
What drew me to Julie was our common interests in humor (Bill Cosby
for example) and the comic book/gaming world. I felt safe in that I
could do 'guy' things with her and that she wouldn't be
uncomfortable. But conversely, I also felt safe pursuing 'gal' things
without feeling demasculinized. It's hard to explain, but I found we
were complimentary.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 6 of 158:
|
Jan 4 17:41 UTC 2002 |
(I've never heard "nice smirk" as an important physical quality before.
Neat.)
|
aluser
|
|
response 7 of 158:
|
Jan 5 02:18 UTC 2002 |
Like Jack said, the willingness to do "guy-things" is important. Then again,
does anyone actually *not* enjoy some gender-atypical activity? Might
affection somehow cause us to be more likely to notice how the person doesn't
conform to stereotypical gender roles?
-Alex
|
vidar
|
|
response 8 of 158:
|
Jan 5 21:41 UTC 2002 |
As an infantilist, I also try and see if I can notice if anybody I'm
interested in also wears diapers.
|
phenix
|
|
response 9 of 158:
|
Jan 5 21:56 UTC 2002 |
yha, fetish play can be hard to find. and that's a shame
hell, just about any non-main stream sexuality is frowned upon adn hard to fnid
in most of the less liberal places.
|
lelande
|
|
response 10 of 158:
|
Jan 5 21:58 UTC 2002 |
like walmart?
|
vidar
|
|
response 11 of 158:
|
Jan 5 23:07 UTC 2002 |
Yeah, but if someone really loves you, they'll accept your fetishes
whatever they may be.
|
lelande
|
|
response 12 of 158:
|
Jan 5 23:19 UTC 2002 |
yeah, if they don't have any self-esteem. does it make sense to say "i didn't
love him/her because i couldn't bring myself to blow up balloons inserted in
his/her ass." is that how love works? this sounds more from the heart: "baby,
i love you, but this balloon business has got to go."
to be less comical, what if someone has a fetish for infidelity? for watching
watching his or her significant other be fucked by strangers? "baby, if you
REALLY loved me, you'd let the dog lick your pussy when i asked you to." no.
|
vidar
|
|
response 13 of 158:
|
Jan 6 00:19 UTC 2002 |
Okay, so maybe not *whatever* they may be.
|
vidar
|
|
response 14 of 158:
|
Jan 6 00:25 UTC 2002 |
Also, though you didn't mention it, I think that excessive fetish play
is a good reason to break up.
|
phenix
|
|
response 15 of 158:
|
Jan 6 18:35 UTC 2002 |
or incompatible fetishes.
|
vidar
|
|
response 16 of 158:
|
Jan 6 23:04 UTC 2002 |
Well, I know at least one place to find people who share that
particular fetish.
|
michaela
|
|
response 17 of 158:
|
Jan 7 16:03 UTC 2002 |
Orinoco - a nice smirk indicates many things...plus, it's sexy. :)
Similar fetishes are a Very Good Thing, and understanding your partner's
fetish (and maybe getting a taste for it) can be cool too.
|
lelande
|
|
response 18 of 158:
|
Jan 8 22:57 UTC 2002 |
14
actually, i think i made the mistake of mixing up 'acceptance', as you said,
with 'compliance'. but, what the hell, blurry lines everywhere.
|
vidar
|
|
response 19 of 158:
|
Jan 9 00:53 UTC 2002 |
OK
|
jazz
|
|
response 20 of 158:
|
Jan 9 18:49 UTC 2002 |
If your partner's into inserting balloons up your ass, then you've got
room for negotiation. If it's an actual fetish, and the only possible way
that they can get off is to insert balloons up your ass, and it doesn't happen
to tweak your nipples for you, then you've got a problem ... you're completely
and utterly sexually incompatible.
|
brighn
|
|
response 21 of 158:
|
Jan 9 19:22 UTC 2002 |
Few people use "fetish" that strongly anymore. Most people use it to mean
"something kink that I really dig."
|
jazz
|
|
response 22 of 158:
|
Jan 9 19:46 UTC 2002 |
Very true. It's still pretty mystifying to me, even if it's not a
complete short-circuiting of the sexual drive, some of the things that people
do.
|
phenix
|
|
response 23 of 158:
|
Jan 9 19:52 UTC 2002 |
btw, welcome back
|
vidar
|
|
response 24 of 158:
|
Feb 5 14:55 UTC 2002 |
Last night I met a woman who shares my particular fetish. I think the
meeting would have gone better had it been less spontaneous and if we
had not both been horrendously tired.
|