You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-43         
 
Author Message
mythago
Auto Dealers Mark Unseen   Dec 26 15:12 UTC 1991

Spinoff of item 4: what experiences have people had with area dealers?  Are
there any you would recommend or warn about?
43 responses total.
danr
response 1 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 26 17:46 UTC 1991

Reread item #4, and never buy a car from Varsity Ford.
princess
response 2 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 28 04:55 UTC 1991

NEVER GO TO ANN ARBOR TOYOTA MAZDA VOLVO!!!!!!!!!
mythago
response 3 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 29 13:02 UTC 1991

re #2, why's that?
ecl
response 4 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 29 20:01 UTC 1991

because you should buy  American !
Buy a Ford, even if the quality is not the greatest.

princess
response 5 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 30 03:11 UTC 1991

AA Toyota Mazda Volvo is absolutely horrible.  Every single dealing
I've had with them has been extremely stressful, unprofessional, etc.
glenda
response 6 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 30 15:36 UTC 1991

We have had nothing but courteous, helpful dealings with AATMV.  We even just
had warranty work done on a 9 year old Tercel (with 217,000 miles on it).  We
will go there again.

Josh and my sister have had rotten dealings with Rampy Nissan.
ragnar
response 7 of 43: Mark Unseen   Dec 30 16:24 UTC 1991

The problem with AATMV is with the sharks in used car sales.  I will say,
though, they've taught me a lot about buying a car and how to stand up to
salesmen.  Bought two cars there, only because of their biannual $1000
drag-it-in trade in sale.  (And I bought chryslers both times)
mdw
response 8 of 43: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:10 UTC 1992

Only real problems I remember with AATMV is with getting appointments;
at one point they were running pretty far behind on things.  Haven't been
back in a while, but they improved to almost reasonable scheduling-wise.
tags
response 9 of 43: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 04:09 UTC 1992

        Never ever go to AATMV they will screw you on price.
        ie.: They would charge as a base price for the new MX-3 GS
        $14,585 when it is clearly shown in Autoweek on two different
        occasions to be a base price of only $13,800.

        Data comes from Autoweek Februrary 10, 1992 page 17 "1992 New Car
        Prices"
        Also they have annoyed me at home with pestering phone calls
        saying "Are you going to buy our car this week, UH UH UH"
        
        Their almost as bad as the army for my age group.
bad
response 10 of 43: Mark Unseen   Feb 13 19:49 UTC 1992

"UH UH UH"? Sounds like an obscene phone call. :)
gunge
response 11 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 4 19:59 UTC 1992

I was able to get a very competetive price on a '92 Camry at AATMV.
mistik
response 12 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 4 20:06 UTC 1992

I was going to say that, the same friend of mine with the v6, got it that
way.  (#4) Toyota Camry is American made!
jeffk
response 13 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 6 03:32 UTC 1992

Even if the quality is not the greatest?  Argh!!  You driven a Ford lately?
They are just as good if not better than any riceburner you can drum up,
short of a lexus.
klaus
response 14 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 6 12:53 UTC 1992

I've heard this line for many years now.  Not to long ago my dad bought
a Ford LTD with extended coverage.  It had received very high marks from
Consume Reports.  The car was a disapointment.  It was always in the shop
for engine related problems.  The idle had to be set so high, to keep it
from stalling, that it took significant presssure on the brake to keep it
from rolling at a stop.  He got so fed up with service from Ford that he
took it to a private auto shop for service.  After $630 of parts and labor,
the car ran fine. The last straw for him was when the water pump went out
, a month later, at 32,000 miles.  He went out and bought a Toyota Cressida
which has not been in the shop to date except for oil changes and the like.
Every car he's ever owned was American built and he swore by them.  Now
he swears by his Toyota.  The LTD was a brand new '88 and the Toyota a '90.
He's 68.
bad
response 15 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 6 15:30 UTC 1992

re #13 - Great. if the quality's there, buy the damned thing. But let
people judge for themselves, without shoving the company line up their 
asses so many times that they either think you need to sell so hard 
because the cars suck, or just go straight to the competition since 
they're tired of the posturing.
"riceburners"...sheesh...
Have a nice day. :)
jeffk
response 16 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 02:44 UTC 1992

I'm not at all advocating the old Buy American theme, I'm just saying that
American cars have changed alot in the last few years and they are now worthy
of serious consideration, not because they are domestic, but because they are
good cars.  I just get a little steamed when people judge japanese cars as
good solely because they are not american cars and american cars as junk
just because of their past reputation.  Nissans and Mazdas are junkier than
anything produced in Detroit -- car magazines have started noticing the dip
in quality.  
mistik
response 17 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 02:45 UTC 1992

Ehm,  that sounds very patriotic.  Nothing wrong with being patriotic,
but it should not detach yourself from reality.
mythago
response 18 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 02:54 UTC 1992

I'm perfectly happy with my Saturn which, unlike the Honda I used to drive,
is not going to turn into a hunk of tin the size of a breadbox if I get
into an accident.
mistik
response 19 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 03:32 UTC 1992

I bought my Dodge 600SE for that reason.  Then I had an accident with a 78
Mustang, and my car was almost totalled. The Mustang had just a little
bump in front of the hood.  I wouldn't bet that Saturn would do any different
than Dodge.  Depends on what you hit.

I have another accident story of a friend of mine who drove a Honda Accord.
Somehow when he was passing a truck at about 60 mph, the truck suddenly
changed lanes, turning his car sideways (still on wheels) and pushing it
sideways at about 60 mph on I-75.  The truckdriver didn't notice a thing,
and it seemed that they were driven an eternity like that.  Someone warned
the truckdriver of the situation, and he stopped.  The car was beyond repair,
since the frame had bent, but no other damage than a bump at the door was
to see.  Not even the tires blew.  Don't try this at home :)

klaus
response 20 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 12:59 UTC 1992

Are the "American" cars really getting better or are the real loosers
being replaced with inports with "American" skins and name plates.

With fuel economy being more and more of a concern as well as safety,
I would expect more and more cars to be totaled in a crash situation.
The idea is not to save the car but the people inside!  If a given car
suffered little damage in a crash, either that energy went into the other
car or into the passengers of the cars.  Look at the Indy, etc. races of
today.  10 years ago it was common for drivers to get hurt badly or killed
in a 200 mhp crash into the wall.  Today the cars break apart and only the
cage, with the driver inside, remain one.  All the parts, that once were
firmly attached to the cars, now go bouncing down the track: Less kinetic
energy to injure the driver!  Energy that went into bending a piece of
sheet metal is energy that didn't go towards injuring the people inside!
mythago
response 21 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 7 18:16 UTC 1992

Well, Saturns are made in Tennessee.
  
There's a difference between your car "crumpling" so as to absorb damage
and getting totalled.  The Honda CRX I was driving buckled in completely
on the left side, barely missing the gas tank.  There were plastic
and metal chips all over the passenger compartment.  The doors popped open.
The seat latch snapped, throwing me forward into the seatbelt and giving
me a nasty whiplash.  Not what I would call absorbing kinetic energy.
danr
response 22 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 13:18 UTC 1992

My father is a Ford employee, and my brother works for EDS, i.e. GM.
So, many of us own Ford and GM cars.  We are almost universally happy
with our Fords.  We are less happy with our GMs.  The only family
member who is really happ with her GM is my sister who owns a Saturn.

Now, it is true we get pretty good deals on these cars, but for me,
the savings would not be worth it if the car was junk.
shf
response 23 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 8 17:24 UTC 1992

GM is another reality-free zone.  The elusive Dr. Lopez is just the latest
example.
jeffk
response 24 of 43: Mark Unseen   Aug 9 02:19 UTC 1992

I agree that a certain amount of crumpling is good to absorb the energy of
a hit, but for insurance purposes, you don't want the car to get totalled
if someone taps you in the rear at 10-15 mph either.  I've been hit 4 times
in back like that at speeds from 5 to 20 mph (of the car in back), and have
had no damage to my car other than scratched paint.  I had to reset my
fuel pump shutoff switch once, but that's it.  I own an Escort, FYI.  I think
this performance is reasonable.  I know people with Honda CRX's who hit poles
while backing out of parking spaces and they break their rear bumper in half.
I don't think that's as strong as my Escort.  Clearly, the Escort reaches a
better balance of survivability and low insurance costs.  That's not patriotic,
or Japan bashing, but just common sense.
 0-24   25-43         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss