You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-7          
 
Author Message
mta
What software do you use most? Mark Unseen   May 20 01:04 UTC 1995

I'm curious which software is most popular for the amiga.  So far I haven't
found that there is anything my PC can do that Amiga can't, though I have yet
to see a word processor/dtp application that can match my MSWord 6.0.

The software *I* use most often is Term.  Toaster 4000 sur is seductive,
though. It has gorgeous/hilarious new wipes.
7 responses total.
matthew
response 1 of 7: Mark Unseen   May 20 19:16 UTC 1995

Never having used MSWord 6 I can't make any comparisons to Amiga software.
For word processing and simple DTP I use Final Writer (I've got Pro-Draw
and Pro-Page if I ever need to do anything really complicated) I've used
both NComm and Term and am undecided about which I like more. For most
of the drawing I do I made the jump and use Brilliance 2.0 now insteda of
DPaint.
lkt
response 2 of 7: Mark Unseen   May 21 02:52 UTC 1995

I use Final Writer also.  Just got the Release 3 upgrade, but haven't
had the chance to discover what the changes are, except for the
additional drawing tools.  PageStream v 2 is what I use for more
complicated stuff, although I find there's very little I need to do
on a regular basis that requires more than Final Writer.  I've got
WordWorth 3.1 on order.  I'll probably enter a review of it here after
I've had a chance to check it out.

I frequently use Brilliance 2.0 on the A4000, but DPaint is still my
first choice on non-AGA machines.  DPaint is also what I turn to when
I want to do text.  In fact, that's probably my only gripe with
Brilliance -- having to enter text a line at a time, as a brush,
rather than being able to type it directly to the screen the way
DPaint does it.

I'm using Term 4.2 right now.  In fact, I just installed it about
30 minutes ago after unpacking it from the 4-disc Aminet CD-ROM I
just got the other day.  So far, it seems pretty slick.
mta
response 3 of 7: Mark Unseen   Jun 10 01:55 UTC 1995

As a longtime (professional) Microsoft Word user, I'm having trouble
finding a way to make a table in any of the Amiga word processors/
page layout programs.  Does anyone know of a not terribly painful
way to do that?  [I just know I've missed something terribly obvious.]

cicero
response 4 of 7: Mark Unseen   Jul 8 01:53 UTC 1995

I use Final Copy  for general word processing and the venerable Prowrite
for writing video scrts.  (It's the only WP that can do non-snaking 
collumns  As far as doing tables, what kindsI usually do it the old fashioned
way--with tab stops.  Is that a painful way?  How does Word do it?   I
have a friend who says that Word is very buggy if you start trying to do
complicated stuff like automatic tables of contents and indecies.  


mta
response 5 of 7: Mark Unseen   Jul 9 22:08 UTC 1995

Hmmmm  yes, Tabs is the painful way.  In word I create a table with x columns
nd y rows, and then I can fidget the layout of the whole table with one stroke
of the moise.


Word can be buggy -- it depends on whether you get the patches as they're 
released.  :)  And always remember to close Windows every 2 hours and
reopen it to continue working.  It'll hold the memory error to a minimum!

(Ah, to have Word for the Amiga and get away from Windows.)
lkt
response 6 of 7: Mark Unseen   Sep 17 19:41 UTC 1995

Wordworth 3.1 seems to have the most painless method for creating tables.
After selecting the table object, simply drag out a box with the mouse.
The box will contain as many rows and columns as will fit in the dragged
out box, using the default font.  Additional rows or columns will be
added if you drag the table box to a larger size, or if you choose a
smaller font as your default before creating the table.  It will also
allow you to calculate cells in a table using four different methods.
"Total" sums contents of cells, "Average" calculates the average of
cells, "Minimum" calculates the minimum value of cells, "Maximum"
calculates the maximum value of cells.
mta
response 7 of 7: Mark Unseen   Sep 18 05:09 UTC 1995

Now *that* would be useful!
 0-7          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss