gull
|
|
response 36 of 404:
|
Dec 28 20:53 UTC 2005 |
Re resp:3: What is there to say about a party that spent more time
listening to sworn testimony about Clinton's Christmas card list than
about Abu Ghraib? The simple fact is they will look the other way at
anything Bush does. If Clinton had been accused of domestic spying,
the walls of the Capitol would have been shaken by the sheer force of
Republican outrage. In fact, that's exactly what will happen if a
Democratic President ever tries to use the expanded executive
privileges Bush and Cheney have been trying to carve out for
themselves.
Re resp:33: I disagree. I think they're fine with democracy as long as
God-fearing Christians hold all the levers of power. If you'll allow
me a little constructive criticism, richard -- I think you often damage
your own arguments by overstating them.
I noticed today that some right-wing commentators are trying to weasel
out of this one with semantics. Now, apparently, what Bush did wasn't
"wiretapping," it was "data mining."
|