You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   13-37   38   39-63   64-88   89-113   114-138   139-163   164-188 
 189-213   214-238   239-263   264-288   289-313   314-338   339-363   364-388   389-413 
 414-438   439-463   464-488   489-513   514-526      
 
Author Message
1 new of 526 responses total.
jep
response 38 of 526: Mark Unseen   Feb 16 13:54 UTC 2006

I wonder if Walmart pharmacists are now going to be required by the 
state of Massachusetts to dispense morning-after pills, even if they 
have ethical reasons not to do so?  As I found out for the last Agora, 
when the topic was Target pharmacies and the morning-after pill, the 
APhA explicitly expects pharmacists to make individual ethical 
decisions on this topic.  I wonder if the Massachusetts Board of 
Registration in Pharmacy (which itself is most likely made up of 
pharmacists) is overruling this component of the APhA?

If so, I wonder what other medical decisions and procedures, and 
ethical issues, are being mandated by the State of Massachusetts?

If a state can mandate that abortion pills must mandatorily be 
distributed by doctors (including pharmacists), I wonder if it can also 
mandate that doctors must perform surgical abortions.

I disagree with the decision of the Massachusetts Board of Registration 
in Pharmacy because of my position against abortion.  I hope their 
decision is overturned, or if it isn't, that it doesn't go further than 
that.
 0-24   13-37   38   39-63   64-88   89-113   114-138   139-163   164-188 
 189-213   214-238   239-263   264-288   289-313   314-338   339-363   364-388   389-413 
 414-438   439-463   464-488   489-513   514-526      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss