|
Grex > Agora47 > #98: I dedicate halloween to jakulantern(aka;jaklumen) | |
|
| Author |
Message |
sabre
|
|
I dedicate halloween to jakulantern(aka;jaklumen)
| 
Oct 17 20:35 UTC 2003 |
He IS the kwisach haderach.......er GREAT PUMPKIN.
check out his photo.
|
| 36 responses total. |
jaklumen
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
Oct 17 21:43 UTC 2003 |
You're so sweet. Gimme a kiss...
*lines up the goat for sabre's kiss*
|
tsty
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
Nov 3 09:43 UTC 2003 |
species too high on eht evolutinalry chain ... try a newt instead.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
Nov 4 05:13 UTC 2003 |
yer missin' the billy joke, TS. it's okay.
|
tsty
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
Nov 4 07:16 UTC 2003 |
doouble reduction ... got the billygoat .. too high on the evo chain, but
a newt is a reactinary right winger .. mulch more sabre's stepladder-buddy.
|
goose
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
Nov 4 14:39 UTC 2003 |
<sigh> sometimes I wish TS would just type in coherent sentences using
conventional spelling.....
|
jp2
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
Nov 4 14:42 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
Nov 4 18:47 UTC 2003 |
Who is more a fool? who is more a fool? the fool, or the fool who follows
the fool?
(I think that was Erik B and Rakim)
|
jp2
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
Nov 4 18:51 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tod
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Nov 4 18:59 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Nov 4 19:02 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
tod
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Nov 4 23:48 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
remmers
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Nov 5 13:54 UTC 2003 |
Re #9: I've heard a variant of that quote: "Argue with a fool, and there
are two fools."
Which is why you don't see me get embroiled in many online arguments. :)
|
naftee
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Nov 5 16:54 UTC 2003 |
Argue this.
|
tsty
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Nov 6 10:25 UTC 2003 |
argument adn tweaking .. adn the slim separation between ... is a
developed art form. most often i tweak .. sometimes i argue.
you figger it out.........
i appraciate goose's observation (#5) whilst subjecting the assembled
multitude to think. goose, among others, does. mayhapps the challenge is
over the top, but, hey, it's me ...
what else can i say?
|
goose
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Nov 6 13:58 UTC 2003 |
So, by trying to figure out what the hell you're saying using unconventional
spelling and grammar you're trying to make us think more? At least for me,
it makes me think less about your rants.
I'm not trying to be a pain in the ass TS, but when your posts are incoherent
rants that are hard to follow, I discount them, as do others.
|
glenda
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Nov 6 17:20 UTC 2003 |
Sorry TS, but it has gotten so bad that I don't read your posts at all. I
am responding to this because of what goose has posted. They don't make me
think, just ignore.
|
bru
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Nov 6 17:51 UTC 2003 |
They ignore me too, TS. I do not think it is teh spelling, but the position
they ignore.
|
keesan
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Nov 6 17:55 UTC 2003 |
It is the spelling. Pico has a spellchecker.
|
remmers
|
|
response 19 of 36:
|
Nov 6 18:52 UTC 2003 |
Re #17: They don't ignore you, Bruce. They just don't agree with you.
|
edina
|
|
response 20 of 36:
|
Nov 6 18:52 UTC 2003 |
Bruce, it's the spelling, not what he posts. I actually do read what you
post.
|
goose
|
|
response 21 of 36:
|
Nov 6 19:06 UTC 2003 |
Bruce, I often don't agree *at all* with what you say, but I never ignore you
or discount what you say based on your position. If you started using TS
style grammar or spelling, then I would be inclined to ignore you.
It is teh spelling. ;-)
|
happyboy
|
|
response 22 of 36:
|
Nov 6 19:12 UTC 2003 |
re14:
*hic*
|
tod
|
|
response 23 of 36:
|
Nov 6 19:32 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 24 of 36:
|
Nov 6 19:48 UTC 2003 |
ZOUNDS!!!
|