|
|
| Author |
Message |
mynxcat
|
|
Mulholland Drive
|
Oct 11 14:48 UTC 2003 |
I finally watched Mulholland Drive. What the hell was it about? I got totally
lost after the Opera scene. I know many of you have seen it, so explain
|
| 36 responses total. |
slynne
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
Oct 11 15:42 UTC 2003 |
David Lynch likes to make movies that make no sense. I guess he likes
to leave it up to the viewer to make up for themselves what it means.
My personal theory is that even David Lynch himself doesnt know what
the hell it is all about. So make up your own meaning.
It has been a long time since I have seen this movie. I remember I came
up with my own idea of what the ending meant but I have long since
forgotten what that was. sorry.
|
remmers
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
Oct 11 17:35 UTC 2003 |
[SPOILER ALERT! If you haven't seen the film but think you might
someday, you may not want to read further.]
If you're going to get lost, the opera scene is certainly the place
to do it. The plot takes a distinctly bizarre right turn at that
point. Suddenly the whole universe built up in the first part of
the film comes apart. Characters change names and roles. Lines of
dialog that we heard in the first part of the film are repeated but
have entirely different meanings.
My theory is that the Naomi Watts character is seriously paranoid
and delusional, and the film is meant to show how things look
from her perspective.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
Oct 11 18:10 UTC 2003 |
Naomi Watts is Betty/Dianne, right?
I think remmers' exlanation made sense. I was leaning toward the second half
was the flashback, and the first part was what hapens after she orders Camilla
killed. But lots of stuff didn't fit in.
|
sabre
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
Oct 12 22:32 UTC 2003 |
This movie makes perfect sense....if you're a guy.
The chick that got thrown from the plane is an analogy to the VC pow that they
questioned and thru from the helicopter.
Sheesh...I bet if it had a romantic theme(instead of a byline) you would
understand it fully. No biggie....chick flicks don't make sense to me either.
|
remmers
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
Oct 13 11:51 UTC 2003 |
(I wonder what movie sabre is talking about. Certainly not "Mulholland
Drive". Maybe the similarly titled "Mulholland Falls" from a few years
ago (which I didn't see).)
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
Oct 13 12:51 UTC 2003 |
Yeah sabre, the only "plane scene" was not even that, just a hot of Betty
coming ot of the airport. There was more of an erotic theme, that I
understood, just confused as to how it tied up with the first half of the
movie.
|
sabre
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
Oct 13 23:11 UTC 2003 |
you know you ARE right.....I was thinking about mulholland falls.
Anyways it was agood movie...staring Nick Nolte.
Mulholland drive I haven't seen.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
Oct 14 17:25 UTC 2003 |
Back to Mulholland Drive, I think the part where Rita/Camilla opens
that box with the funky blue key signifies "Pandora's Box" It was as
if she unlocked the whole episode that led to her present state
|
kenscann
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Oct 16 12:44 UTC 2003 |
Mullhaolland Drive was going to be a TV seris...but you yanks don't know a
good thing when u see it (see twin Peaks)
STop
END
POST
quit
|
remmers
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Oct 16 13:00 UTC 2003 |
(Welcome to Grex. "It gets easier."(tm) ;-)
Right, what ended up as the movie was originally supposed to be a
mini-series a la "Twin Peaks", on ABC I think. At some point, Lynch
and the network had a parting of the ways. Not surprising. TV
may be a lot more permissive now than it was a few decades ago, but
even nowadays there's content in "Mulholland Drive" that I have
trouble imagining that a broadcast network would allow in prime
time.
Actually, I'm glad that "Mulholland Drive" was released as a
theatrical film. Lynch got to do it the way he wanted to.
Your mileage may vary, but I think "Mulholland Drive" is close
to being Lynch's best work, and it's one of my favorite movies
of the last few years.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Oct 16 14:32 UTC 2003 |
Don't think I've watched any of Lynch's other work
|
kenscann
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Oct 16 14:58 UTC 2003 |
?
i agree, though another Lynch TV show would have been great, A third series
of Peaks would have been amazing, and on the air was hilarious!...u should
check that out
|
aruba
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Oct 16 15:49 UTC 2003 |
I was pretty into Twin Peaks when it was on, but it went rapidly downhill
after we found out who killed Laura Palmer.
|
remmers
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Oct 16 16:27 UTC 2003 |
They should've done "Twin Peaks" as a limited-run miniseries.
Instead, they tried to stretch it out into a regular series and,
as is too often the case, tended to run out of good ideas before
they ran out of film.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Oct 16 16:48 UTC 2003 |
re #13: My tastes are unusual in a number of respects, but one of
them is that I thought the second season of Twin Peaks was much more
interesting than the first.
|
kenscann
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Oct 16 22:28 UTC 2003 |
i totally agree, the second series had LOADS more going for it than the
first!, its just more of what u come to expect from a D Lynch story...the
whole Wyndam Earl plot was great!
|
remmers
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Oct 17 00:59 UTC 2003 |
My recollection, which is admittedly vague, was that "Twin Peaks"
declined toward the end of its run. This didn't include all of the
second season by any means.
"Twin Peaks" was not exclusively a David Lynch creation, by the way.
Not nearly as much as "Mulholland Drive". He neither wrote nor
directed most of the episodes.
|
kenscann
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Oct 17 10:11 UTC 2003 |
he wrote a great deal of Peaks and directed a couple of the episodes as well,
as he was busy shooting Wild at Heart at the time, the other guy was called
Mark Frost (who he did on the air with as well)...lynch added the dark
atmospheric parts and Frost added the TV/Comedy feel to it...it was a good
combo!
|
aruba
|
|
response 19 of 36:
|
Oct 18 20:29 UTC 2003 |
I think that's right. Mark Frost wasn't involved with the movie (Fire:Walk
with Me), which might explain the total lack of humor therein.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 20 of 36:
|
Oct 18 21:25 UTC 2003 |
That's a start, but frankly it'd take an awful lot to explain
just what made "Fire: Walk With Me" such a trainwreck.
|
kenscann
|
|
response 21 of 36:
|
Oct 22 13:44 UTC 2003 |
because it was originally 5 hours long, and cut to hell! ...theres a campaign
to get the full version released!
|
aruba
|
|
response 22 of 36:
|
Oct 22 13:57 UTC 2003 |
Oh God, please, spare us!
|
remmers
|
|
response 23 of 36:
|
Oct 22 14:42 UTC 2003 |
I'd be curious to see the full version of "Fire..." if it's ever released.
|
kenscann
|
|
response 24 of 36:
|
Oct 23 10:06 UTC 2003 |
it keeps almost getting released and then not!!...its fgrustrating as lynch
is my favourite director and i'd love to see the full version!
|