You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-36         
 
Author Message
mynxcat
Mulholland Drive Mark Unseen   Oct 11 14:48 UTC 2003

I finally watched Mulholland Drive. What the hell was it about? I got totally
lost after the Opera scene. I know many of you have seen it, so explain
36 responses total.
slynne
response 1 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 11 15:42 UTC 2003

David Lynch likes to make movies that make no sense. I guess he likes 
to leave it up to the viewer to make up for themselves what it means. 
My personal theory is that even David Lynch himself doesnt know what 
the hell it is all about. So make up your own meaning. 

It has been a long time since I have seen this movie. I remember I came 
up with my own idea of what the ending meant but I have long since 
forgotten what that was. sorry. 
remmers
response 2 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 11 17:35 UTC 2003

[SPOILER ALERT!  If you haven't seen the film but think you might
 someday, you may not want to read further.]


If you're going to get lost, the opera scene is certainly the place
to do it.  The plot takes a distinctly bizarre right turn at that
point.  Suddenly the whole universe built up in the first part of
the film comes apart.  Characters change names and roles.  Lines of
dialog that we heard in the first part of the film are repeated but
have entirely different meanings.

My theory is that the Naomi Watts character is seriously paranoid
and delusional, and the film is meant to show how things look
from her perspective.
mynxcat
response 3 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 11 18:10 UTC 2003

Naomi Watts is Betty/Dianne, right?

I think remmers' exlanation made sense. I was leaning toward the second half
was the flashback, and the first part was what hapens after she orders Camilla
killed. But lots of stuff didn't fit in.
sabre
response 4 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 22:32 UTC 2003

This movie makes perfect sense....if you're a guy.
The chick that got thrown from the plane is an analogy to the VC pow that they
questioned and thru from the helicopter.
Sheesh...I bet if it had a romantic theme(instead of a byline) you would
understand it fully. No biggie....chick flicks don't make sense to me either.
remmers
response 5 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 11:51 UTC 2003

(I wonder what movie sabre is talking about.  Certainly not "Mulholland
Drive".  Maybe the similarly titled "Mulholland Falls" from a few years
ago (which I didn't see).)
mynxcat
response 6 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 12:51 UTC 2003

Yeah sabre, the only "plane scene" was not even that, just a hot of Betty
coming ot of the airport. There was more of an erotic theme, that I
understood, just confused as to how it tied up with the first half of the
movie.
sabre
response 7 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 23:11 UTC 2003

you know you ARE right.....I was thinking about mulholland falls.
Anyways it was agood movie...staring Nick Nolte.
Mulholland drive I haven't seen.  
mynxcat
response 8 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 14 17:25 UTC 2003

Back to Mulholland Drive, I think the part where Rita/Camilla opens 
that box with the funky blue key signifies "Pandora's  Box" It was as 
if she unlocked the whole episode that led to her present state
kenscann
response 9 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 12:44 UTC 2003

Mullhaolland Drive was going to be a TV seris...but you yanks don't know a
good thing when u see it (see twin Peaks)
STop
END
POST
quit
remmers
response 10 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 13:00 UTC 2003

(Welcome to Grex.  "It gets easier."(tm)  ;-)

Right, what ended up as the movie was originally supposed to be a
mini-series a la "Twin Peaks", on ABC I think.  At some point, Lynch
and the network had a parting of the ways.  Not surprising.  TV
may be a lot more permissive now than it was a few decades ago, but
even nowadays there's content in "Mulholland Drive" that I have
trouble imagining that a broadcast network would allow in prime
time.

Actually, I'm glad that "Mulholland Drive" was released as a
theatrical film.  Lynch got to do it the way he wanted to.
Your mileage may vary, but I think "Mulholland Drive" is close
to being Lynch's best work, and it's one of my favorite movies
of the last few years.
mynxcat
response 11 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 14:32 UTC 2003

Don't think I've watched any of Lynch's other work
kenscann
response 12 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 14:58 UTC 2003

?
i agree, though another Lynch TV show would have been great, A third series
of Peaks would have been amazing, and on the air was hilarious!...u should
check that out
aruba
response 13 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 15:49 UTC 2003

I was pretty into Twin Peaks when it was on, but it went rapidly downhill
after we found out who killed Laura Palmer.
remmers
response 14 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 16:27 UTC 2003

They should've done "Twin Peaks" as a limited-run miniseries.
Instead, they tried to stretch it out into a regular series and,
as is too often the case, tended to run out of good ideas before
they ran out of film.
mcnally
response 15 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 16:48 UTC 2003

  re #13:  My tastes are unusual in a number of respects, but one of
  them is that I thought the second season of Twin Peaks was much more
  interesting than the first.
kenscann
response 16 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 22:28 UTC 2003

i totally agree, the second series had LOADS more going for it than the
first!, its just more of what u come to expect from a D Lynch story...the
whole Wyndam Earl plot was great!
remmers
response 17 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 00:59 UTC 2003

My recollection, which is admittedly vague, was that "Twin Peaks"
declined toward the end of its run.  This didn't include all of the
second season by any means.

"Twin Peaks" was not exclusively a David Lynch creation, by the way.
Not nearly as much as "Mulholland Drive".  He neither wrote nor
directed most of the episodes.
kenscann
response 18 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 10:11 UTC 2003

he wrote a great deal of Peaks and directed a couple of the episodes as well,
as he was busy shooting Wild at Heart at the time, the other guy was called
Mark Frost (who he did on the air with as well)...lynch added the dark
atmospheric parts and Frost added the TV/Comedy feel to it...it was a good
combo!
aruba
response 19 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 20:29 UTC 2003

I think that's right.  Mark Frost wasn't involved with the movie (Fire:Walk
with Me), which might explain the total lack of humor therein.
mcnally
response 20 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 21:25 UTC 2003

  That's a start, but frankly it'd take an awful lot to explain
  just what made "Fire: Walk With Me" such a trainwreck.
kenscann
response 21 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 13:44 UTC 2003

because it was originally 5 hours long, and cut to hell! ...theres a campaign
to get the full version released!
aruba
response 22 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 13:57 UTC 2003

Oh God, please, spare us!
remmers
response 23 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 14:42 UTC 2003

I'd be curious to see the full version of "Fire..." if it's ever released.
kenscann
response 24 of 36: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 10:06 UTC 2003

it keeps almost getting released and then not!!...its fgrustrating as lynch
is my favourite director and i'd love to see the full version!
 0-24   25-36         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss