|
Grex > Agora47 > #53: The California Recall Prediction Item | |
|
| Author |
Message |
gull
|
|
The California Recall Prediction Item
| 
Oct 2 18:23 UTC 2003 |
This is where you can post your prediction for who will win the
California recall election.
|
| 28 responses total. |
gull
|
|
response 1 of 28:
|
Oct 2 18:24 UTC 2003 |
I think Arnold will win. He's the perfect candidate for California --
all image, no substance.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 2 of 28:
|
Oct 2 21:13 UTC 2003 |
he drives hummers. what a moronic soldier wannabee.
|
tod
|
|
response 3 of 28:
|
Oct 2 21:33 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 4 of 28:
|
Oct 3 18:09 UTC 2003 |
Thank God that someone is finally taking a stand
against those dreadful American Indians in KKKalifornia
and their special interest casino money.
|
tod
|
|
response 5 of 28:
|
Oct 3 18:31 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 6 of 28:
|
Oct 3 23:58 UTC 2003 |
one who drives a shitty yuppie version of a
military vehicle even?
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 7 of 28:
|
Oct 4 01:01 UTC 2003 |
you mean an H2, specifically? I thought he bought one when Hummer had
first released the H1.
(I'm snipping at details-- don't mind me =) )
|
scott
|
|
response 8 of 28:
|
Oct 4 13:05 UTC 2003 |
Actually Arnold had a modified Humvee back before they were being sold as
"Hummers" with luxury appointments.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 9 of 28:
|
Oct 5 06:47 UTC 2003 |
that makes much more sense.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 10 of 28:
|
Oct 7 00:50 UTC 2003 |
I forget, are we voting for govenor or cars?
|
tsty
|
|
response 11 of 28:
|
Oct 7 07:19 UTC 2003 |
whe cars have governors it's time for antoher revolution .... <g>.
|
gull
|
|
response 12 of 28:
|
Oct 8 14:40 UTC 2003 |
Well, once again Californians have lived down to my worst stereotypes
about them.
|
tsty
|
|
response 13 of 28:
|
Oct 8 15:08 UTC 2003 |
ballots, not bullets - taht is a 'worst stereotype?'
|
tod
|
|
response 14 of 28:
|
Oct 8 16:56 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 15 of 28:
|
Oct 8 17:28 UTC 2003 |
Re #13: I'm referring to the fact that they elected someone who ran a
totally shallow, image-over-substance campaign. Arnold dodged pretty
much every policy question ever put to him but got elected anyway
because he's a famous actor. Just goes to show that Californians can't
tell Hollywood from reality.
|
tod
|
|
response 16 of 28:
|
Oct 8 18:06 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 17 of 28:
|
Oct 8 18:34 UTC 2003 |
I wanted that porn star to win :(
|
scg
|
|
response 18 of 28:
|
Oct 8 18:39 UTC 2003 |
Hey now... Arnold may have won the rest of the state, but he didn't win the
Bay Area.
|
carson
|
|
response 19 of 28:
|
Oct 8 21:23 UTC 2003 |
(technically, he won the whole thing, but I understand your point.)
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 20 of 28:
|
Oct 9 00:53 UTC 2003 |
resp:17 Mary Carey? You must be joking.
|
klg
|
|
response 21 of 28:
|
Oct 9 01:55 UTC 2003 |
(Yes. It was reported that the elite areas - Hollywood & SF - voted
against the recall. The areas with regular people supported it.)
|
polygon
|
|
response 22 of 28:
|
Oct 9 05:17 UTC 2003 |
Notice who finished 9th, ahead of the porn star?
Not one of the media darlings. In fact, somebody you never heard of.
But his name was SCHWARTZMAN, and that was good for more than 10,000
votes from confused Ah-nold voters.
|
carson
|
|
response 23 of 28:
|
Oct 9 06:05 UTC 2003 |
(it wasn't the Jewish vote?)
|
tsty
|
|
response 24 of 28:
|
Oct 9 08:05 UTC 2003 |
ntoice who finished LOWER the teh porn star - simon, last year's
candidate facing davis. wouldnpt want to be davis OR simon today.....
btw, 60+someitng% of the new-governor's vote was NON-democrat!
and ... (this must suck to the max) MORE people voted to *recall* than
voted *for* davis last november.
THWACK!!!!
forget the percentages on that one - raw numbers (in this case) rule.
|