|
Grex > Agora47 > #39: Assisted Suicide-- right or wrong? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
richard
|
|
Assisted Suicide-- right or wrong?
|
Sep 28 08:03 UTC 2003 |
From yesterday's New York Times:
"Son's Wish to Die, and Mother's Help, Stir French Debate
By CRAIG S. SMITH
Published: September 27, 2003
ARIS, Sept. 26 "I Ask the Right to Die," written by Vincent Humbert,
a 22-year-old French paraplegic, hit bookstores here on Thursday. Today
he died, two days after his mother put an overdose of sedatives into
his intravenous line.
She acted on the third anniversary of the car accident that left him
paralyzed, mute and blind.
His death and his book calling for the legalization of euthanasia have
transfixed the nation and drawn the debate over assisted suicide out of
hospital wards and into people's homes.
Assisted suicide is outlawed in France but is permitted under certain
circumstances in the Netherlands and Belgium. It is fully legal in
Switzerland, where there are associations that help terminally ill
patients kill themselves.
Radio call-in programs, television talk shows and the opinion pages of
the country's newspapers have swelled with discussion of Mr. Humbert's
death and what punishment, if any, his mother, Marie Humbert, should
receive.
Ms. Humbert, 48, who had campaigned for the right to end her son's
life, was taken into custody by the police on suspicion of attempted
murder late Wednesday but was released on Thursday and allowed to see
her son before he died. She was subsequently hospitalized at an
undisclosed location. Her current whereabouts is unknown.
Lib ration, the country's largest left-wing daily, praised Ms. Humbert
in an editorial headlined, "Let us end this hypocrisy." An editorial in
Le Monde, France's leading newspaper, called only for a national debate
but pointed out that the country's national ethics consulting committee
recommended in January 2000 that a law be passed legalizing euthanasia
in exceptional cases.
So far, the country's judicial system is dealing gently with Ms.
Humbert, who won enormous public sympathy in her campaign for
euthanasia.
Justice Minister Dominique Perben asked prosecutors in a statement
today "to act with the greatest humanity in applying the law, taking
into account the suffering of the mother and the young man." The lead
prosecutor in the case told reporters that an official inquiry into Mr.
Humbert's death would be undertaken "in due time."
Mr. Humbert's plight captured national attention last December after he
wrote a direct appeal to France's president, Jacques Chirac, asking for
the legal right to end his own life. Mr. Chirac wrote back that he
could not grant the request "because the president of the republic
doesn't have that right, but I understand your helplessness and deep
despair in facing the living conditions that you endure."
Mr. Humbert then set about writing his book from his bed at the same
hospital in the northern port of Berck-sur-Mer where Jean-Dominique
Bauby, all but incapacitated by a stroke, wrote his haunting
memoir, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly." Mr. Bauby died in 1997,
two days after his book was published.
Mr. Humbert wrote his book with the help of a journalist, Fr d ric
Veille, by pressing with his thumb and nodding his head to spell out
words as Mr. Veille read repeatedly through the alphabet.
In "I Ask the Right to Die," Mr. Humbert recounts with heartbreaking
bitterness how his life as a healthy, careful young fireman ended when
his car met an oncoming truck on a narrow country road. After enduring
months of ebbing hope that he would recover any of his lost faculties
he even lost his senses of taste and smell he decided he wanted to
die and with his mother began the campaign.
Mr. Humbert had argued to be allowed to end his life legally in France
because he was unable to afford the cost of transport abroad, even if
it could have been arranged.
"Then, so that you understand me better, so that the debate about
euthanasia finally reaches another level, so that this word and this
act are no longer a taboo subject, so that we no longer let live lucid
people like me who want to put an end to their own suffering, I wanted
to write this book that I will never read," he wrote.
In the book, which was the second-best-selling title on France's
Amazon.com Web site this morning, Mr. Humbert described asking his
mother to kill him and her decision to do so. As the third anniversary
of his Sept. 24 accident approached, his mother signaled her intention
to kill her son in media interviews.
Ms. Humbert injected sedatives into her son's intravenous drip late
Wednesday, sending him into a coma. The family then pleaded with
doctors to let him die. Mr. Humbert died today after doctors abandoned
efforts to keep him alive, saying in a statement that they had made
their "collective and difficult decision in complete independence."
Mr. Humbert's book ends with a plea to readers to empathize with his
mother and leave her in peace. "What she has done for me is surely the
most beautiful proof of love in the world," he wrote."
So where do you stand on this issue? Do you think this woman deserves
to go to jail for helping her son to die? Is assisted suicide ethical?
Assisted suicide is a thorny issue, but I think in general if someone
really, deeply and honestly wants to die, that it is their life and
their decision to make. Personally, I think prosecuting this woman
serves no purpose, this was her son and he wanted to die and jail isn't
going to cause her to suffer any more than she already has. I hope
they let her go.
|
| 36 responses total. |
mary
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
Sep 28 11:43 UTC 2003 |
I do too.
Then I hope they change the law to allow others the
same control over the end of their lives.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
Sep 28 13:51 UTC 2003 |
If you look for Hemlock Society on the web, you will find a group in the US
that is working for the same change in US law.
In Michigan, suicide is illegal, and the home hospice staff told me and my
friend's children that they were required to report to the police any
conversations they heard about helping him end his life.
He had been a supporter of Ed Peirce and the movement in Michigan to add a
constitutional amendment allowing such choices. So, shortly after his
esophagus was removed because of cancer, he asked me to find out what
alternatives he had. That's when I found the Hemlock Society.
He was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer in February, was told he had on the
average, 12 months to live, and died from cancer 4 months later.
|
tod
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
Sep 28 13:56 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
dah
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
Sep 28 14:21 UTC 2003 |
Why are sickos always named Humbert.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
Sep 28 17:20 UTC 2003 |
re0 tldr.
re 3 & 4 AHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
|
keesan
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
Sep 28 17:26 UTC 2003 |
I have stage IV lymphoma. Maybe there are different types of stages?
Mine is quite treatable.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
Sep 28 21:11 UTC 2003 |
I did some searching on the web to try to find why suicide itself,
assisted or not, is considered illegal in most countries. I didn't find
any real legal reasons, and there are very few serious treatments of the
question. One I found is
http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/201/300/cdn_medical_association/cmaj/vol-1
59/
issue-3/0239.htm
This article mostly addresses attitudes toward suicide, which seem to be
the basis for the condemnation of suicide, but not for its illegality.
The only direct statement for its illegality is "The act of self-killing
was considered criminal because it was perceived as transgressing the
moral authority of God and the righteous feelings of humankind". This is
hardly a reason that should hold any weight in our secular legal system.
It is my opinion that suicide itself should be decriminalized, as it is
not a matter with which criminal law should be concerned. Assisted
suicide, however, is different, as the motives of another besides the
suicide can enter. The issue then is to make suicide the absolute choice
of the suicides themselves, with "assistance" only in the form of carrying
out the suicides wishes.
|
jep
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
Sep 29 01:39 UTC 2003 |
I can think of any number of ways that suicide could be encouraged for
the terminally ill. "You're costing us money and it can never do any
good, and we can't afford it." "The kids are scared of you." "You're
worthless." If suicide and assisted suicide were legal, I would hope
that driving someone toward it could be discouraged.
Also, non-terminally ill people could be lied to for the gain of
others. (Terminally ill people, of course, could also be lied to; for
example, a doctor who likes the income telling someone they've got a
better chance of survival than they really do.) Those things should
be discouraged, but I don't see how to prove that they've happened.
It might be a good thing to have restrictions on why and how someone
could kill himself, or assist in the suicide of another. Mentally ill
people should probably be treated, not killed off. I'd prefer not to
have people pushed off buildings towering above busy sidewalks.
I am in favor of allowing terminally ill people to end their lives,
too, as long as it's their free and fully informed choice. I think
properly ensuring that it is their choice is highly tricky. I don't
know how to be completely sure of that, and so I hope the lawmakers
and judges proceed very slowly and carefully when it comes to
legalizing suicide or the assisting of suicide.
|
fitz
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Sep 29 12:59 UTC 2003 |
A plausible reason for sanctions against suicide is that it gives government
agents a statutory pretext for intervening.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Sep 29 18:23 UTC 2003 |
Yes, it does do that, but the legal basis for the pretext seems lacking.
|
klg
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Sep 30 03:02 UTC 2003 |
What was that story (on CNN.com) today about a city (in FL?) that has
voted to criminalize a proposed "concert" during which someone was
supposed to commit suicide on stage. Any of you sick-os planning to
attend that?
|
rcurl
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Sep 30 03:13 UTC 2003 |
I would think you'd be planning on going, since you approve of the death
penalty, and only sicks minds do.
|
richard
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Sep 30 06:00 UTC 2003 |
A couple of years ago, famed sixties guru Timothy Leary, who was dying of
cancer, wanted to kill himself online. He wanted to wait until one of his
last days, when his body was ravaged with cancer, and then get on a party
chatroom and talk with young people and then take a drug cocktail and expire
on-line. It was his life and this was how he wanted to die. He was even
going to have a videocam hooked up to his computer, so people could go to his
site and watch him die. But he got threats and officials said they'd shut
his site down. So he didn't end up dying online like he wanted. But why
shouldn't he have had that choice? Leary was going to die anyway, so if he
wanted to die in a chatroom, with his image seen over the internet, wasn't
that his choice
|
tod
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Sep 30 13:18 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Sep 30 13:44 UTC 2003 |
Right goals, dead wrong way to achieve them... <bleah>
|
gull
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Sep 30 14:27 UTC 2003 |
I think I'd be in favor of assisted suicide in some situations, but I
think the examples in #0 and #14 are the wrong way to go about it.
|
tod
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Sep 30 15:29 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Sep 30 16:35 UTC 2003 |
Hey, if people don't like this band's approach they won't buy their products,
which will result in them going out of business. When I put on my "free
market" goggles it all makes perfect sense.
Of course those free-market Republicans can't help but meddle in things, so
they'll try to shut this down.
|
tod
|
|
response 19 of 36:
|
Sep 30 17:55 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 20 of 36:
|
Sep 30 18:50 UTC 2003 |
GG Allin claimed on several occasions that he was going to off himself
onstage, usually at a halloween show. Instead he OD'ed on horse after a show
with no one to watch.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 21 of 36:
|
Sep 30 19:05 UTC 2003 |
I think this much more distasteful than inherent illegal, if the suicide
is totally volunteer, without coercion of any kind. This just means
that I think suicide is a private matter, and it is "suspicious" if done
for public consumption, especially if not to make a "statement" (as has
been done by some Buddhist monks, if I recall correctly).
|
tod
|
|
response 22 of 36:
|
Sep 30 19:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 23 of 36:
|
Sep 30 20:31 UTC 2003 |
Voluntarily?
|
other
|
|
response 24 of 36:
|
Sep 30 22:33 UTC 2003 |
Ok. An alcoholic mouse.
|