|
Grex > Agora47 > #10: Bummer for the season after Summer | |
|
| Author |
Message |
tpryan
|
|
Bummer for the season after Summer
| 
Sep 24 13:26 UTC 2003 |
Been Blue? Bummed? Tell us about it.
|
| 413 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 1 of 413:
|
Sep 24 17:26 UTC 2003 |
Eighteen items already.
|
lynne
|
|
response 2 of 413:
|
Sep 24 23:17 UTC 2003 |
I don't want/need a job for another 14 months, and I'm already stressed out
about whether I'm going to find one.
|
katie
|
|
response 3 of 413:
|
Sep 25 00:55 UTC 2003 |
I emailed my dad's wife yesterday to see how he was, as I haven;t heard
a peep for weeks (she had asked me not to call, just to use email).
She responded that he passed away two weeks ago.
I just don't get it.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 4 of 413:
|
Sep 25 00:57 UTC 2003 |
Oh, Katie how awful! She must be a very hurting person to have to hurt others
that way.
|
katie
|
|
response 5 of 413:
|
Sep 25 00:58 UTC 2003 |
She's not, that's the thing.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 6 of 413:
|
Sep 25 01:50 UTC 2003 |
I guess that was ambiguous. I meant to quote the "Hurt people hurt people"
concept. The idea that someone must have a big-time hurt inside themselves
to go around hurting others.
|
richard
|
|
response 7 of 413:
|
Sep 25 03:08 UTC 2003 |
katie, really sorry to hear about your dad.
since you say your stepmom isn't a hurting person, do you think your
dad put her up to her actions (i.e. not communicating with you)
Sometimes when people are sick or hurting, they just can't bear to be
with or deal with people, even people they love. It is just the way
some people react when they are confronted with bad things, to close
themselves off. you shouldn't take it personally, I'm sure it had no
reflection on his love for you or anything. Again, condolences
|
keesan
|
|
response 8 of 413:
|
Sep 25 03:37 UTC 2003 |
Maybe she was just too sad to contact anyone?
|
twenex
|
|
response 9 of 413:
|
Sep 25 11:11 UTC 2003 |
My God, that's a real bummer. I'm very sorry for you, Katie.
|
scott
|
|
response 10 of 413:
|
Sep 25 12:29 UTC 2003 |
Sorry to hear about your dad, Katie. Definitely not a good thing.
|
vidar
|
|
response 11 of 413:
|
Sep 25 13:23 UTC 2003 |
Seems that for much of my life Lofn has been guiding my heart in the
wrong directions.
|
jep
|
|
response 12 of 413:
|
Sep 25 13:44 UTC 2003 |
Katie, I'm really sorry.
|
jep
|
|
response 13 of 413:
|
Sep 25 13:47 UTC 2003 |
I was finally able to go to one of my stepson's football games last
night. But it was called off on account of the thunderstorm. I was
able to pass him the sweatshirt I got him from the Smithsonian by
asking his coach to call him to the locker room door.
I'll get another chance to go to a game in 2 weeks.
|
asddsa
|
|
response 14 of 413:
|
Sep 25 19:44 UTC 2003 |
TWO UNLUCKY RESPONSES MISSED.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 15 of 413:
|
Sep 26 13:25 UTC 2003 |
I'm sorry to hear of your loss, Katie. I take it all
arrangments had been taken of, also without your input.
|
tod
|
|
response 16 of 413:
|
Sep 26 18:20 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
slynne
|
|
response 17 of 413:
|
Sep 27 12:47 UTC 2003 |
I cant even imagine what you are going through, katie. You have all my
sympathies though
|
katie
|
|
response 18 of 413:
|
Sep 27 18:37 UTC 2003 |
Thanks, everybody.
|
richard
|
|
response 19 of 413:
|
Sep 29 02:59 UTC 2003 |
IBB I've been receiving spam email on my grex login from somebody using a
yahoo mail. They address the mail not to my or my login but to:
Undisclosed.Recipients@cyberspace.org
this apparently bounces these emails all over grex. why does this work?
isn't there a way to block such methods?
|
scg
|
|
response 20 of 413:
|
Sep 29 06:04 UTC 2003 |
The To: line is a part of the message. It has nothing to do with who the
message was actually sent to.
|
mdw
|
|
response 21 of 413:
|
Sep 29 08:51 UTC 2003 |
Grex *should* be rejecting mail that says in the RFC 822 headers that
it's to "Undisclosed.Recipients@cyberspace.org". That's a generic
address, one of a bunch that are only used by spammers. You should
forward any such mail to "uce". I found one other such sample of the
tail end of that file, so I can believe that something can go wrong with
the check. I'm not sure what - when I tried to recreate it just now
using the sample message somebody else sent to uce, the check caught it
just as it should.
Grex should also be rejecting mail with invalid .com return addresses -
but versign may have broken that.
|
remmers
|
|
response 22 of 413:
|
Sep 29 11:44 UTC 2003 |
<remmers curses verisign>
|
keesan
|
|
response 23 of 413:
|
Sep 29 17:34 UTC 2003 |
I get undisclosed repicient spam at grex frequently - in fact I set procmail
to filter on that string. I stopped forwarding spam a while ago (to uce) but
will start again if it will be helpful.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 24 of 413:
|
Sep 29 17:52 UTC 2003 |
I'd not seen the "undisclosed_recipient@cyberspace" before; I have seen
something like "<undisclosed recipients>", which Pine seems to use when there
is no "To:" or "cc:" field in the message text. That is, it shows up when
all the addressees were blind carbon-copy (bcc) addressees.
|