richard
|
|
response 114 of 264:
|
Aug 13 21:39 UTC 2003 |
There was an article in the New York Times earlier this week on how
crazy the California recall process is. Basically, with hundreds of
candidates on the ballot, it would be logical to list everybody running
alpabetically by last name, so you'd know where to find your candidate
on the ballot. But thats not what they are doing. They actually held
a LOTTERY style drawing where they picked letters of the alphabet out
of a hat or something randomly, and the first letter chosen determined
the first person on the ballot. So that if the first letter was "G"
and alphabetically, somebody named George Gaaronson was the first
person with the last name G whose name comes up, he'd get listed first
on the ballot. But then the second person who appears on the ballot
WOULDN'T be the second name listed alphabetically under G, it would be
the first person listed under the second letter of the alphabet that
comes up in the drawing. Or something like that. Totally absurd.
So what you'll have is several hundred people on the ballot, with the
names all scrambled and in no logical order, so you'll have to look
long and hard to find your candidate's name. This probably means LONG
lines on election day.
Also there are stories that there are right wing groups gearing up to
go hard negative on Arnold. Arnold is a Republican, but he is a
moderate, and even worse for some conservatives, is pro-choice and an
environmentalist. Those folks would rather have a DEMOCRAT as governor
than a pro-choice tree hugger! One article said they may use in ads
outtakes from Arnold's "Pumping Iron" movie, the documentary about
Arnold's bodybuilding days in the seventies, which show a young Arnold
smoking a marijuana joint, exhaling and laughing. Yep, this campaign
could get nasty! I mean unlike Clinton, Arnold couldn't even at least
deny he inhaled, because its on tape! :)
|