|
|
| Author |
Message |
cloud
|
|
Pocket Power
| 
May 19 02:15 UTC 1998 |
If you had absolute power over you're pocket lint, what would you do with it?
Remember, if you command it to become something else, like an apple, than it
will, but there-after it is no longer you're pocket lint, and there fore you
have no more power over it than you would over any other apple.
|
| 36 responses total. |
font
|
|
response 1 of 36:
|
May 19 07:20 UTC 1998 |
TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!!!
|
orinoco
|
|
response 2 of 36:
|
May 19 22:08 UTC 1998 |
Turn font's pocket lint into egg salad sandwiches, just to frustrate her
egomaniacal scheming.
|
cloud
|
|
response 3 of 36:
|
May 19 23:04 UTC 1998 |
"Pocket Lint! Perform silly aerobatic tricks for me!"
<So I'm easily amused>
|
font
|
|
response 4 of 36:
|
May 31 08:22 UTC 1998 |
Hrmf. I can't even make a joke here anymore.
Should I start archiving stuff? All in favor
Say "Aye!" (or EYE, or I or whatever)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 5 of 36:
|
May 31 16:01 UTC 1998 |
Nose?
|
snowth
|
|
response 6 of 36:
|
May 31 16:11 UTC 1998 |
Raddish.
<The Queen hath spoken.>
|
cloud
|
|
response 7 of 36:
|
Jun 4 01:10 UTC 1998 |
AIEEEEEE!!!
|
font
|
|
response 8 of 36:
|
Jun 6 15:20 UTC 1998 |
Ok, well I'm guessing that since 'nose' sounds like 'no' and isn't an eye,
that he is against archival activities on the accordions conf.
'Raddish' implies radical movements, hense she must be in favor of archival
activities. Dispite cloud's rather deseptively fatalistic tone, I believe
he's in favor of the motion because it sounds remarkably like 'aye'.
so far it's 2 for and 1 against. Any one else willing to cast a vote?
(btw, I was thinking of seeing if I could have it set up so that
Old accordions and New accordions could be two separate conferences,
since their respective flavours are radically different)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 9 of 36:
|
Jun 6 22:07 UTC 1998 |
I dunno, I tend to be against freezing and archiving and restarting and such.
It's nice to have the old items around, for character and suchlike. And yeah,
the flavor's different, but such is life.
|
snowth
|
|
response 10 of 36:
|
Jun 7 18:40 UTC 1998 |
I say we burn it down, man! Just get a bunch of old furnature and burn it all
to the ground! So there!
|
cloud
|
|
response 11 of 36:
|
Jun 15 13:53 UTC 1998 |
<Some one, I dare say, was feeling bitter.>
|
font
|
|
response 12 of 36:
|
Jun 19 16:37 UTC 1998 |
<font offers the entire staff and hooligans of accordions some bitters>
|
snowth
|
|
response 13 of 36:
|
Jun 19 19:08 UTC 1998 |
<teehee... bitter? Who? Me? Na, never... >
|
cloud
|
|
response 14 of 36:
|
Jun 19 21:07 UTC 1998 |
<Shrugs>
|
snowth
|
|
response 15 of 36:
|
Jun 20 03:08 UTC 1998 |
You know, that silly spam song would be even cuter if you said "shrug" instead
of spam. Like, "shrug shrug shrug shrug shruggedy shrug!"
|
cloud
|
|
response 16 of 36:
|
Jun 22 03:47 UTC 1998 |
It's almost as fun as saying "Smock!"
Smock smock smock smock smock smock smock smurf smock smock snickers smock
smock smock... etc....
|
orinoco
|
|
response 17 of 36:
|
Jun 25 13:56 UTC 1998 |
or Smoot!
Did you know there was a Hawley-Smoot Tarrif?
Neither did I.
|
cloud
|
|
response 18 of 36:
|
Jul 28 00:14 UTC 1998 |
Pocket Lint! I command you to spread the good word, "Smoot."
|
orinoco
|
|
response 19 of 36:
|
Aug 8 16:04 UTC 1998 |
Doctor, doctor, there's lint on my lawn!
|
cloud
|
|
response 20 of 36:
|
Aug 11 03:31 UTC 1998 |
Don't worry son, it's only spreading the good word.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 21 of 36:
|
Aug 11 18:00 UTC 1998 |
As in, the gospel according to Lint?
|
cloud
|
|
response 22 of 36:
|
Aug 12 18:19 UTC 1998 |
And the lard saideth to the massesess, "Smoot."
|
snowth
|
|
response 23 of 36:
|
Aug 30 04:18 UTC 1998 |
Can I travel at the speed of lint? Please?
(What? Hey! What? Hey! What?! What?! Hey! Hey hey hey! *WHAT*?????!)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 24 of 36:
|
Aug 30 18:11 UTC 1998 |
What indeed? Inquiring smoots want to know.
|