|
|
| Author |
Message |
snowth
|
|
TO BE FED AND HARRASSED AT THE PROPER TIME
| 
Mar 16 04:01 UTC 1998 |
PLEASE DO NOT
PESTER, PERTURB
PROVOKE, PERPLEX
PUNCH, PICK, POUNCE
PUSH, PULL, PRY
POKE, PECK, PROD
PINCH, PAW, POP
PLUCK, PLINK
PLONK, PLUNK
PLAID, PAISLEY OR
POKA-DOT
THE PANDAS
|
| 44 responses total. |
remmers
|
|
response 1 of 44:
|
Mar 16 11:06 UTC 1998 |
Panda plonking -- the shame of Peoria.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 2 of 44:
|
Mar 17 03:49 UTC 1998 |
You rang?
|
font
|
|
response 3 of 44:
|
Mar 29 09:00 UTC 1998 |
Polkadotted pandas would be cool.
|
teflon
|
|
response 4 of 44:
|
Mar 29 19:58 UTC 1998 |
can you panda the polkadots?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 5 of 44:
|
Mar 29 23:06 UTC 1998 |
you can pander to them, does that count?
|
snowth
|
|
response 6 of 44:
|
Mar 30 04:00 UTC 1998 |
It doesn't matter to me, as long as you don't paisley them.
|
font
|
|
response 7 of 44:
|
Apr 1 07:15 UTC 1998 |
what's wrong with paisley pandas? <font likes paisley. font really, really
*likes* paisley>
|
teflon
|
|
response 8 of 44:
|
Apr 1 19:28 UTC 1998 |
paisly wolves are cool too...
|
snowth
|
|
response 9 of 44:
|
Apr 1 22:17 UTC 1998 |
Well, you can't paisley the pandas. It's just not allowed. (But you can
paisley me!) <snowth puts on a paisley bodysuit to keep the other accordions
entertained.> Better?
|
teflon
|
|
response 10 of 44:
|
Apr 2 03:02 UTC 1998 |
No. I'd rather see a paisley panda. <Cricket moves off to sulk>
|
snowth
|
|
response 11 of 44:
|
Apr 4 02:29 UTC 1998 |
Oh.. poor cricket, hanging out it in the flirt with Tricia conference... :(
(And, no, I am _not_ the first one to say that... (I just happen to agree.)
Do I get to flirt with myself now? :)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 12 of 44:
|
Apr 4 03:07 UTC 1998 |
(And does this mean we need to find a panda for Cricket to flirt with?)
|
teflon
|
|
response 13 of 44:
|
Apr 4 04:32 UTC 1998 |
I refuse to flirt across species. Its just not natural. And I appologise
if I have a hard time flirting. I guess its just not natural to me. <Cricket
needs a hug to make him feel better>
|
snowth
|
|
response 14 of 44:
|
Apr 4 05:20 UTC 1998 |
<Tricia Hugs Teflon>
|
teflon
|
|
response 15 of 44:
|
Apr 4 06:20 UTC 1998 |
<teflon thinks about doing some flirty guesture, then gives up>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 16 of 44:
|
Apr 5 00:16 UTC 1998 |
why were there four three musketeers, anyway?
|
font
|
|
response 17 of 44:
|
Apr 6 06:29 UTC 1998 |
It's like 5 beatles. The woman who is a part of the MIB. The woman who works
for PictureMan. HOw controled the trolling masses of grexers are.
How non-fontlike the fontly is. (I am not a pointsize! I was not named to
be sold, and Truetype is not My Name!)(notice also this name is used on a
system where there only exists ascii2. (like the jupiter1, the presence of
ascii1 is often debated but never proved)
<font hums her mantra "I will not be like brenner, I will not be like brenner>
|
void
|
|
response 18 of 44:
|
Apr 6 08:29 UTC 1998 |
and if they were *musketeers*, why all the emphasis on being good
swordsmen?
|
font
|
|
response 19 of 44:
|
Apr 7 09:19 UTC 1998 |
I don't know, void, but it certianly says alot about the quality of muskets
in those days, don't it?
|
cloud
|
|
response 20 of 44:
|
Apr 15 20:22 UTC 1998 |
Oh, arr.
|
snowth
|
|
response 21 of 44:
|
Apr 20 00:32 UTC 1998 |
I am woman, hear me roar!!
<meow.>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 22 of 44:
|
Apr 20 21:24 UTC 1998 |
(You know, you never hear anyone saying "I am man, hear me roar")
(perhaps because it sounds stupid.)
|
cloud
|
|
response 23 of 44:
|
Apr 21 00:25 UTC 1998 |
Duh. _I_ think there should be a "I am Man! Hear me SNORE!!!"
Zzzzz...
|
orinoco
|
|
response 24 of 44:
|
Apr 21 02:59 UTC 1998 |
Heck yeah.
|