|
|
| Author |
Message |
font
|
|
New Item (generic: less price, more value)
| 
Aug 22 05:39 UTC 1997 |
Flobsy be bop. Time to answer questions.
Why is the sky that gawd awful collor? Can't they change it without damaging
the environent?
this place needs drapes. DRAPES!
Why are there many many stores selling wallpaper?
Ping my brain??????
Are there any sugestions for top ten lists?
Poetry random and ballistic? Or has it been outlawed?
(If it has, why does that stop you?)
(perhaps is should be to *INCOURAGE* you)
Hey, why aren't more poems written with every line ending in a question mark?
Remember kids, when answering these questions, be verbose, but don't be
richard (or whatever he's calling himself) And let's *not* make it a
richard rant-fest!
|
| 23 responses total. |
orinoco
|
|
response 1 of 23:
|
Aug 24 18:11 UTC 1997 |
Do you object to poems written with every line ending in a question mark?
Would you perhaps like to see more of them?
Would you mind if I entered some?
Do I have enough energy to think of one to enter?
|
font
|
|
response 2 of 23:
|
Aug 25 06:29 UTC 1997 |
obviously not. <sniff>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 3 of 23:
|
Aug 25 20:48 UTC 1997 |
Shall I come back later when I have one written?
Can anyone think of a way to answer the former question in the affirmative
while still using a question mark?
|
font
|
|
response 4 of 23:
|
Aug 26 02:49 UTC 1997 |
?yes.
|
font
|
|
response 5 of 23:
|
Aug 26 03:02 UTC 1997 |
yes?>
Times of the bewildered eat the trees?
can't you hear them calling?
when the rodent swings between the trees?
cuz he can't see they've been eaten?
so he falls hard and blinks into the sun?
and we wonder why he's false?
but this poem will end?
so that people may live?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 6 of 23:
|
Aug 28 00:59 UTC 1997 |
<orinoco bursts into applause?>
|
font
|
|
response 7 of 23:
|
Sep 6 04:25 UTC 1997 |
<because it ended,or because it was created??>
|
orinoco
|
|
response 8 of 23:
|
Sep 7 00:01 UTC 1997 |
Why must I restrict myself to one reason alone?
|
remmers
|
|
response 9 of 23:
|
Sep 8 08:30 UTC 1997 |
One man, one reason. It's as simple as that.
|
font
|
|
response 10 of 23:
|
Sep 8 21:12 UTC 1997 |
well, it may look like only one man, but you have to test the brainwaves.
it may be two, in whichcase we would have to see which one answered which way.
This is a bit to facist to me, so I leave it as a gedanks-experiment...
|
orinoco
|
|
response 11 of 23:
|
Sep 9 02:42 UTC 1997 |
One man, one reason? Sounds suspiciously un-PC to me.
If I was in drag, could I have more than one reason?
What about if I were in drag?
Or just "Were I in drag?"
The linguistic terrorist's brigade marches onwards, unfazed by their lesser
compatriots who are content to merely march onward.
|
font
|
|
response 12 of 23:
|
Sep 18 03:31 UTC 1997 |
No, no "reason" here. But wave patterns are unique, like fingerprints. IF
you have more than one, regardless of gender, percieved gender, sexual
preference, etc, that would point to the presence of multiple personalities.
However, I must admit, I am skeptical, too. How do we know that the
brainwaves don't change when you think different things? (after all it was
only a science thing. It generally takes them at least 20 years to iron the
conflicting studies, and then you just have a common perception, and never
the truth.) Fontly supports all linguistic terrorism openly. No one will be
spared, not even my car!
|
orinoco
|
|
response 13 of 23:
|
Sep 21 19:15 UTC 1997 |
Could you spare my car, given that I don't have one?
It would never do to terrorize a nonexistant entity.
Or perhaps merely an existent nonentity.
|
snowth
|
|
response 14 of 23:
|
Sep 23 03:58 UTC 1997 |
Which would be worse, dating your nonexistant sister, or dating your actual
sister? Or dating your car?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 15 of 23:
|
Sep 25 01:20 UTC 1997 |
It strikes me that toyotophillia is not necessarily a mortal sin.
|
srw
|
|
response 16 of 23:
|
Sep 27 06:06 UTC 1997 |
manual or automatic? It might make a difference.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 17 of 23:
|
Sep 27 17:58 UTC 1997 |
Our toyota is an automatic. Our subaru is a manual.
Our subaru's maual is in the glove compartment.
My gloves are in the toyota.
|
snowth
|
|
response 18 of 23:
|
Sep 28 19:59 UTC 1997 |
So, then, where's the toyota? For that matter, where are your mittens?
|
orinoco
|
|
response 19 of 23:
|
Sep 29 22:00 UTC 1997 |
And what about my crayons?
|
font
|
|
response 20 of 23:
|
Sep 30 03:32 UTC 1997 |
Hmmmm you might want to ask the pope about dating crayons.
"flesh" is pretty kinky, if a bit racist. Magenta has a magnetic
personality. But I am afraid I don't *do* crayons, thank you.
|
orinoco
|
|
response 21 of 23:
|
Sep 30 22:36 UTC 1997 |
If you've got multiple flesh tones in one box, is it a multi-ethnic
relationship?
|
font
|
|
response 22 of 23:
|
Oct 9 02:05 UTC 1997 |
that works, but crayola seems resistant. I mean, if your date is a crayon,
would it consider Crayola a god? The anti-christ? Whistler's Mother?
|
bhungerf
|
|
response 23 of 23:
|
Oct 12 09:16 UTC 1997 |
View hidden response.
|